Martin Logan SL3 Floorstanding Speakers
Martin Logan SL3 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 17, 2018]
rtglide
Strength:
I have owed my SL3's since new from1998 and love them more today than ever. Incredible sound and with 2 powered subs they are better than ever. Running 2 emotiva xps 1 mono block amps they have stood the test of time. I owned 6 pairs of DQ10's before I bought the SL3's and still own my last pair so having both I have some classics and never want for anything More. I used to own several audio stores in the 70's and John Dahlquist and I used to sit up all night and listen to vinyl. Weakness:
Really need a sub to get the true low end Price Paid: 2800.00
Model Year: 1998
|
[Jul 18, 2009]
sad_loser
AudioPhile
I waited a long time to get these and have not been disappointed. I paid GBP750 on the bay and had to get both of them in a saloon car to get them home (possible- just). Make sure you try before you buy as if run on cheap amps they will be wrecked by clipping, and new panels are not cheap. Mine had been run by Chords, so no problem.
|
[Oct 10, 2003]
WES
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Location, location, location...
Weakness:
Non switching ES power supply Having bought these gems 11 years ago, I can honestly say that nothing else comes close- not Kappas, not Monitor Audio, nor Mission. I have to unplug and vacuum them every 8 - 10 weeks, but driven with a humble Nak PA5 mk II they are, like the baseball player, outstanding in their field. I did have one problem when I moved to a larger appt - the rear wave was cancelling out the front wave and I nearly gave up on them. Thanks to an honest owner at Alternative Audio, I tried an innovative solution - I made up two wood deflectors, using 3/4" dowels and 1" thick oak hockey pucks, painted s.g. black. The rear wave now cancels out the front wave and the beautiful soundstage is back. The only non-stat I'e heard that comes close was an IRS set-up in Florida. Since I can't really afford a small Lear Jet, the $16.00 fix was worth every penny. Similar Products Used: 'stat headphones |
[Nov 07, 2002]
Jerry O
AudioPhile
Strength:
Open, airy, transparent, natural placement of instruments and detail.
Weakness:
Tough to place in a smallish room. A bit large. I actually owned an SL3 a few years ago. Then, to try something different, I replaced them with a highly regarded cone/dynamic speaker. I purchased these used, mint condition.. Although the cone speaker was quite nice, I soon missed that open, airy, transparent sound of the SL3's. So, a couple months ago I went back to the SL3's. I feel like I just came back home after wondering through the cone jungles. The sound just floates in air as only 'stats can do. I think these will stay around for awhile. Considering the accuracy of sound reproduction, I think they are a relative bargain Similar Products Used: Martin Logan Sequal, Aerius i. |
[Aug 13, 1997]
Eugene L. Green
an Audiophile
A strong argument for "high end" audio equipment is reliability,durability, and endless musical pleasure (accompanied, of course by intervals of frustration and small adjustments, tweaking, to improve performance). My SL3s, purchased three months ago to replace Magnepan Tympanis are driven primarily by twenty-five year old Audio Research tube amplifiers, SP3A preamp and D51 poweramp(with new Svetlana output tubes). The sound of music(classical and jazz) is however noticeably brightened and made more transparent by using a modern solid state amplifier for the low frequency speaker. I chose a Parasound HCA1000A since it is moderately priced and includes pots to permit reduction of its input level relative to the input to the lower powered tube amp. Using the Parasound only on the SL3s is not satisfactory; in my opinion this leads to a substantial loss in realism of the music. Xover at 250 Hz is passive-internal on the Martin Logans. I used a series capacitor in the line to the Audio Research D-51 to substantially reduce very low frequency input to that 50watt/channel tube amp (about 9db at 60Hz), while negligibly (I hope) affecting the sound. The Martin-Logans are very sensitive to lead resistence. Lines to the loudspeakers should be short, relatively heavy, and tightly connected. Overall result is superb. |
[Mar 02, 2000]
Sidney
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clarity, transparent, and showroom look.
Weakness:
Weak on Bass, but that's what a subwoofer is for. Keeping it short.. Most people have said great things about it so far, and I agree with them. It's lacking in bass, but SL3 seem to me more designed for the mids and highs. If you plan to get a full sounding system (any good speakers), you'll have to buy a powered subwoofer for it. |
[Mar 15, 2000]
Ross
Audiophile
Strength:
soundstage, transparency and imaging
Weakness:
cabinet work while good quality, is somewhat plain - a high quality wood cabinet would befit the styling and capabilities of this speaker in a word - awesome - no speaker in this price range comes close - you need good equipment and good recordings, properly set up and positioned these speakers will just blow you away with their realism. |
[Feb 27, 1997]
Brad Trayser
an Audio Enthusiast
Extremely accurate, detailed and transparent (a warning though - it is not at all forgiving of bad recordings). |
[Aug 24, 2000]
Ray M
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crystal clarity, soundstaging, musicality
Weakness:
Need the right front end Get your pair now while you still can. They are just discontinued and you should be able to "steal" a pair from your local dealer (one in my area is selling new in a box for $1298 each.) |
[Nov 13, 1997]
Bill Mathis
an Audiophile
I heard a pair of logan SL3's about 2 years ago at Audio concepts in Grande prairie Alberta. Now it's 2 years later and I have a pair bringing up the rearAccented by the quests up front along with the Logos centre. |