Denon AVD-2000 Others
Denon AVD-2000 Others
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 07, 2013]
James
Audio Enthusiast
Very capable decoder, especially using as a 2ch DAC now days as AC-3 is a little outdated. The dual BB PCM1702s in the main channels ensure very nice music reproduction, that means warm and yet detailed punchy sound. The sound quality is same as if not better than my DENON 2800 CD player, when connected to my Apple mac mini optical output.
|
[Jul 09, 2003]
etischer
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Individual gain controls for each input and each of 6 channels. Very simple design. The remote has the master volume, channel volume and input selector. There are also some effects buttons on the remote.
Weakness:
No bass or treble controls. No video swtiching. Could use one more 6 channel input. Sounds great and gives the user tons of flexiblity. I have several carver 2 channel rack mount amps. Having this preamp allows me all the freedom in the world to hook things up how I want. If I want more power, I just have to swap out an amp instead of having to change my whole system. The sound quality is much better with this decoder than with the built in decoder in my dvd player. There is a Master volume control, as well as 6 gain controls for each of the surround sound channels. These gain controls are configured for each input, so the gains can be setup differently for each component, ie lots of sub for the dvd input, lots of center for the tv input. This preamp also has a 6 channel input. I bridge my 2 channel stereo input to the front L&R, sub, and rear L&R input channels so I have pure unprocessed stereo sound from all my speakers. This works great for filling a room with music since most Dolby digital recievers do not use the sub or rear channels when playing 2 channel stereo. There is also a stereo line out for recording purposes and an optical out. |
[Dec 14, 1999]
John T
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound quality, flexibility & choices available
Weakness:
a little complicated to use/setup - cost a star I've been continually upgrading my HT system this past year, and in making the final move to separates, this came in line... I'd been using a Technics DD/DTS decoder - for decoding DD, it was pretty much OK, but it was typically "bright and harsh", as with most inexpensive digital processing. I'd read that this Denon was a great-sounding unit, and affordable. Similar Products Used: Technics DD/DTS decoder, HK AV receiver, Fosgate Model 4, Rotel THX pre/pro |
[Apr 29, 1999]
Mark A. Valade
an Audiophile
I've owned and operated the Denon for about 2 months now. Since I only have two sources (CD and DVD), I actually use the unit as a preamp as well. What a wonderful piece. Attractive and well built (aluminum insted of tin faceplate) but not overdone. I use a passive, analog, 5 channel decoder built by Ed Frias Enterprises (EFE) for my music listening (if you want pure, analog, passive, 5:1 decoding for music listening, which does not affect your main speaker signal, you have got to audition this one!) and the Denon has a "6 channel input" for such a source. When in the "6 channel input" (bypass) mode, all of the processing is bypassed except master and individual channel volume controls. Not exactly an audiophiles idea of pure bypass but I've done the comparisons and the Denon is absolutely silent. As a matter of fact, it's nice to still have remote volume.As a processor, it's a gem both to program and operate. All of the versitility needed for a custom setup without the over done method of Lexicon. Sound is as good as it gets and the processing is top notch. The fact that it does not have DTS is no problem in my book. How many DVDs have you bought recently that are encoded with DTS? |
[Apr 16, 1999]
PML
an Audio Enthusiast
I've owned this processor for about a year and a half now and am still very impressed with its performance, especially considering what I paid ($400). It is one of the few DD processors that allows you to turn the Dialog Normalization off, which improves the dynamic range and clarity. Unlike many competing processors, all four of its digital inputs can be used (many have one coaxial and one optical assigned to a source - you can use either or, not both). It also has an AC3 RF demodulator, a optical out, and a 6 channel analog-input, inwhich the bass management, speaker distance, and volume are controlled with this unit. But the reason why I am so happy with the AVD2000 is the DACs. They are 20 and 18 bit Burr-Browns and sound superb. Ofcourse they are no match for a Levinson, Theta, etc. but are much better than the typical 1-bit DACs in most competing processors, DD receivers, and budget CD players. In my opinion they are better than the much lauded 24/96 DACs in my Panasonic A-110 DVD player. The DSP modes are also very good. The 5-channel Stereo and Matrix modes do not alter the sound of the main L/R channels and are actually useful for stereo music enhancement. The Mono-Movie mode is also very useful. I chose this processor over the Sony EP9ES and price wasn't the reason. That should tell you all you need to know. Check it out for yourself. |
[May 15, 1999]
Kenneth Wang
an Audio Enthusiast
A fine piece of equipment. If you are looking to add AC-3 capability to your system, it is difficult to go wrong at this price (usually around $250 new). The Dolby Digital decoding is done very well, but the Cinema Eq of the Pro-Logic mode does NOT truly compare to real THX (my H/K AVR 80 is THX certified, and the difference is dramatic). But that is not why one buys it right? |
[Sep 24, 1999]
PML
an Audio Enthusiast
I've owned this excellent digital pre/pro since Jan. '98 and has been one of the best purchases for my A/V system I've made. It simply sounds superb...Dolby Digital, PCM Pro Logic, Stereo, and even the DSP modes are all top shelf. I was recently able to buy the Sony SDP-EP9ES for $300 and after all the great reviews I've read about it, I figured it would replace the AVD-2000 and I would use the Denon in my second system. Not so, the Denon sounds better (see my review of the EP9ES in the Pre-Amp review section if you are trying to decide between these two). Simply put, the Denon sounds cleaner and smoother in all modes and has features like dedicated stereo record outputs that make it a better choice for seperates-based systems. Denon's "Matrix" mode is also great. I use it nearly every time I listen to CD. Unless you need a processor with tone controls, I say get the Denon. |
[Sep 20, 1999]
Ed
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had the Denon AVD-2000 decoder in my HT system for about a year now. This unit can be used as a stand alone preamp processor in an all digital sourced system or as 'add on' to a pre-existing Prologic/analog based system. I use the AVD-2000 in the latter situation with a Fosgate model 4 preamp connected to the Denon's 6 channel inputs on the AVD-2000. This allows the option to process all my analog sources (vcr, cd) through the Fosgate while allowing Dolby Digital processing of my DVDs and digital processing of CDs through the AVD-2000. The other surround modes offered by the AVD-2000 when using a digital source such as a CD are also excellent, especially the 5 channel stereo. |
[Apr 16, 1999]
joshua
an Audiophile
ive had this unit for about a year now. i have been quite pleased with it. like others, this unit is strictly a processor which is basically a narrowed fuctioning computer. i use this strictly for dolby digital decoding from dvd and that is ALL i use it for. setup could be difficult and time consuming for the first time user, but that is to be expected when you consider all of the perameters that go into account. i feel this is a great unit for the price. very important: after you complete all of the setups for these processors, do yourself a favor and hide the remote. people can seriously screw you up by hittin the wrong button for these. this is WAY better than the built in dd decoders that come on some dvd and ld players. |