Townshend Audio CD Sink Others
Townshend Audio CD Sink Others
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 29, 2006]
Simon Bartlett
AudioPhile
Weakness:
See above. There's some good sense and some horseplop contained in the preceding reviews. I've been gradually dealing with the problems of vibration over the last few years, having biult a pretty good setup with quality cabling and mains treatments. Distortions caused by vibration are the biggest single enemy of fidelity. Bicycle inner tubes give (at best) maybe 60% of what is available from a seismic sink platform. That may seem like the law of diminishing returns appplying with vigour, but I suspect that those of you who are pursuing genuine fidelity will realise that the closer you get to 'natural' sound, the more small differences are audible, even to spouses who may have started out as skeptics. The sinks work less well with equipment whose mass is unevenly distributed, as the feet carrying most of the mass have to be raised, which compresses the air sac under that corner. With some degree of skepticism, I bought one of the new VSSS racks, and matching speaker stands. The combination, though going against the accepted wisdom that speakers must be rigidly coupled, is staggering. It ought to be, because you are looking at around £2,500 for the pair, but after listening to a system sitting on them, only the cloth-eared would deny that vibrations need to be tackled. The soundstage is immense, and the bass is totally integrated into it, rather than from the 'room' in which you listen; fine detail is improved, as is midrange fluidity and sweetness in the treble. Bass acquires the sort of tautness only experienced live, and consequently timing is spot on. Soothing music soothes, exciting music becomes truly invigorating.
Customer Service Rubbish. Obvioulsy the products don't require servicing, but delivery dates where never stuck to. Not good enough, even though the wait is worth it. Similar Products Used: Ditto. |
[Mar 02, 1997]
Tom Power
an Audiophile
The "CD Sink" by Townsend should be rated as budget "Tweak" of the year. This simple isolation platform transformed the sound of my CD player. Immediately notable was the clean solid bass extension, and the removal of some mid-bass bloom. The treble was smoothed and seemed more transparent. It also improved both the imaging and transparency of the sound radiating from my speakers. For approx. $225 Cdn (U$150), this improved the sound of my system more than some very expensive cables I have tried. For another review, see "AUDIO" magazine Feb. '97 for Corey Greenburg's review of the NAD 512 CD Player and 314 Amp, where he raves about the CD sink. Higly recommended. |
[Mar 30, 2000]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
I endorse the positive comments here so will not repeat them. I use CD Sinks under transport, dac and preamp. I use small bicycle inner tubes under my monoblocks. Do not get suckered into believing Vibapods or Sorbothane feet are in the same league - they most certainly are not. One negative comment - I also have one of the larger heavier seismic sinks and I have never gotten it to sound good anywhere. In particular it robs the upper bass of leading edge and therefore pace and rhythm suffer badly. This is a shame because the improvement on vocals (over the CD sink) is remarkable. |
[Aug 11, 2000]
Glenn
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
It is a nice little stand on which to place your player What is there to review? The concept that vibration isolation is needed and at all an issue in digital reproduction is an audiophile inanity not supported by the simplest empiric test nor educated logic. It is solely supported by people trying to sell you needless things and by magazines like Stereophile that seek to convince the untutored that vibration isolation is a sure fire way to audio nirvana. |
[Jul 02, 1998]
Max Townshend
an Audiophile
Date July 2 98 |
[Dec 27, 1997]
Bow Liu
an Audiophile
Date:12/27/97 Home built Isolation bases:Why pay for expensive isolation bases, make your own, for the amp, for the CD player, for the turntable, etc., etc.It's easy,either you do it or get some one to builf it.For the Thorens TS-125B Mk.II turnatble, I got a friend to build me a large isolation base:17" x 15" x 5" using medite(cheaper if you use 1/2" plwood). The box was glued (you can use screws) and the inside was sprayed with black asphalt car undercoatingIincluding the bottom of the lid)and than filled with 60lbs.+ of fine sand. Then the lid id glued shut. The base is set on 3 cones,set in a triangle pattern, and the audio product, also set on similar placed cones, is placed atop the base. The base gets rid of distortion, cleans up the bass, improves the treble(because you've gotten rid of distortion),and the background from which the music issues for is dramatically quieter.The sound is free of hash and the volume control is lowered because you just hear more.All for a cheap price.It only cost $25Cdn to build one for a CD player and the sonic improvements were immediately noticeable.This is one of the cheapest sonic upgrades one can apply to one's system. |
[Jun 04, 1998]
Rick Becker
an Audiophile
If you are skeptical about the Seismic Sink, buy a 16" bicycle inner tube andplace it under your component. A brick or stone on top will mass load the |
[Jun 22, 1998]
Bill Gaver
an Audiophile
See my comments of June 9, 1998 regarding Townshend Audio under Townshend AudioSink. |
[Jun 22, 1998]
Ken
I have 3 CD sinks -under Dac,Transport, and Preamp.I am told these products are no longer avaiable in the USA or that the Company |
[Jul 23, 1997]
Jack
an Audiophile
this worked on my Marantz 67SE and my Rotel CDP-990. it made the bass deeper and tighter, made the sound cleaner and smoother across the board.Highly recomend it! I'm getting a heavy duty one for my amp(back ordered), will keep you posted. |