Krell Home Theater Standard A/V Preamplifier
Krell Home Theater Standard A/V Preamplifier
[Jun 10, 2002]
ken
AudioPhile
Strength:
Music, build quality, looks, broad cast quality switching, control for personal taste and room set up.
Weakness:
Price, no volume control for zone 2(7.1 has it and a DAC upgrade) This kicks ass! Expensive--yes Worth it only if you enjoy music! This machine is great sound for both music and movies. Alot of money but no comparison. There is no competition. Similar Products Used: proceed, lexicon, yamaha, denon, sunfire, B+K, Bryston, Acurus, Classe, rotel, marantz, meridian |
[May 30, 2002]
chinman
AudioPhile
Strength:
detail, transparency, soundstage, military grade source switching, 12V DC trigger capability, balanced output for source
Weakness:
must use OSD to configure devices, 2 sec delay when switching sources, no tuner Was deciding between this preamp and the proceed avp. Used in conjunction w/ my kav-500 amp, the image focus is nothing short of jaw dropping. The clarity is amazing. Not bright at all with my goertz silver sapphires. Take advantage of the balanced inputs and outputs. Great bargain if you can find one used. Krell is notorious for great customer service. They really stand behind their products. MY HT: http://www.geocities.com/chinje2000/ht.htm Similar Products Used: sunfire home theater grand II |
[Feb 12, 2002]
Gregory Gomez
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
See previous review.
Weakness:
None I am updating my previous posting about the Krell Home Theater Standard processor. The unit I listened to was the third generation in this series of pre-amps from Krell with a suggested retail price of $8000. It is the latest processor with 7.1 capability. It also uses Bur Brown DACs. So my review is for the Krell HTS 7.1 and not the second version in the series, which is now discontinued. I would also like to note that the amplifiers used in my listening test were the mid-level CX version Krell mono-blocks, retailing for a mere $17,500 a pair. These are great sounding amplifiers, and they should be at that price! This past weekend I had an opportunity to listen to a Meridian/Mark Levinson setup that was not as involving. The air, detail, smoothness, and "you-are-there" quality of the Krell system was noticeably lacking. For example, tracks 5 and 9 of Cantate Domino (Proprius) lacked the warmth and smoothness that I had herd with the Krell equipment. The soundstage was not as large either. Moreover, the analog hiss on this CD is much less noticeable with the Meridian/Levinson combo, which is good, but it does show that either the amp/preamp combination or the cabling is veiling the overall resolution of this well-known CD. But that is not to say the Meridian/Levinson equipment was poor. It had a well-balanced, full bodied, lively, and dynamic quality, which I know so well. I also suspect that the equipment, while having been burned-in for about 200 hours, was still too new. It took nearly 1000 hours (no misprint) for the brightness to wear off of my Proceed AMP 5. By the way, this equipment included a Meridian 507 CD player, Mark Levinson 334 power amp, Mark Levinson 380 preamp, Transparent Audio MusicLink Super Balanced Interconnects, Transparent Audio MusicWave Super Speaker Cables, and the Thiel CS6 loudspeakers. Similar Products Used: Proceed AVP |
[Jan 14, 2002]
s
Audiophile
Strength:
Componet video switching, upgradable
Weakness:
2 second delay with coaxial digital To the reviewer Robert. I always respect peoples opinions Similar Products Used: mc-12, mc1 |
[Nov 06, 2000]
STEVE
Audiophile
Strength:
Dynamics, soundstage and life like imaging.
Weakness:
I just can't find any at this time. I have been demo(ing) a/v preamps now for 6 months and I believe I can finally decide that the HTS is going to be my choice. You may of notice that I didn't say winner. Every a/v product in this price range has some very special features however, the main reason why I will choose the HTS is that you don't need to tweak the product to have that tremdous soundstage and wonderful sound in both stereo and HT. My latest audition between the HTS and MC1 was in Harvey's with a James Taylor dvd in concert and Dire Straits Sultan of Swing. Clearly, the HTS outperformed the Lex in soundatage and sound dynamics overall. The dvd was played on a big screen Runco projector with Vienna Acoustic mozarts and velo 15. Besides the Runco, not Harvey's top of the line but both units did wonders for the Vienna's. Watching the dvd, both units were wonderful but there was a greater separation in stereo. The HTS just sounded better to me and my ears. If you want the technical review I'm sure Eric 's listed below can answer some question. Similar Products Used: Yamaha dsp-A1, demo Lexicon Mc-1, Cal Lab 2500, Proceed AVP |
[Jan 03, 2000]
Joe Cole
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Easy of use. Fabulous Sound. Above average build quality. Did I say fabulous sound?
Weakness:
2 second delay when playing cds and after pausing DVDs. Price. I love to listen to well recorded music and the 2-channel sound from the HTS was the primary reason I bought this unit. The review of the HTS in Home Theater Magazine (December I think) nails this pre/pro perfectly. The stereo sound is outstanding almost as good (maybe as good if I had one to compare it to next to it) as a Conrad Johnson preamp. Pure music, no noise within 2 miles of this unit. Great detail. Detail like the Conrad gives you. Similar Products Used: Lexicon MC-1, Meridian 565. |
[Sep 20, 1999]
DaveH
an Audiophile
Just a correction to the earlier review. The Krell is not the only Pre/pro with balanced XLR outputs. The Sunfire Theater Grand also has (6) balanced XLR's outputs as well as RCA. it uses composite, S-video, and component video switching and in addition, uses Crystal Semiconductor DAC's too. |
[Nov 29, 1999]
Bob
Audiophile
Strength:
Awesome sound
Weakness:
Interface Much better sound than the comparable Proceed. I listened to the D/A compared to my Krell ref64 and was pleasently surprised the HTS held its own. I do not experience any delay with pause, ff, rev, etc using a Sony 7700 DVD player; according to Krell some players break the bitstream and some don't. (?) Similar Products Used: Proceed |
[Nov 18, 1999]
Jeff
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound.
Weakness:
Quirky. Set up not a flexible as I would like. This review should be read with the understanding that I have only recently purchased this unit. First, the bad news: the unit is a bit quirky. That is, I can't turn my lights off or on without the unit temporarily shutting down. Such problem is likely related to the wiring in my apartment, but I've never had the problem with any other unit. Next, I can't figure out how to listen to left/right stereo and the sub only. The unit has an "enhanced stereo" mode that incorporates the left, right, center and sub channels, but I don't always want to hear the center. I wrote Krell an E-mail this afternoon inquiring about this issue. Parenthetically, don't trust your audio dealer to know about products like the HTS. The guy I used is a really nice guy, but he didn't know much about the unit. "Oh, ya, the DAC's are 24/96." "Oh, ya, you can listen to your main speakers and the sub. That's the 'enhanced stereo' mode." Wrong and wrong. Finally, the delay mentioned in the other review is a drag, but I can live with it. Similar Products Used: None. |
[Jan 19, 2002]
Ruben Garcia
Audiophile
Strength:
Pre amp feature, great for SACD and the great DAC
Weakness:
Price I waited a long time to make sure that I could make a contribution to this forum. I hates when somebody writes a review the same week they get the gear in place. I had this preamplifier for more than six months now. This Is, I think the perfect time to write this review, because I still remember life before this Krell came into my system. I have a Sony SACD player, the SCD777ES hooked to the Krell two ways. Analog for SACD playback and digital to use the Krell internal DAC for CD's. This allows me to use a subwoofer for CD playback. Similar Products Used: McIntosh MX 132, McIntosh 130 |