Technics SU-C1000 A/V Preamplifier
Technics SU-C1000 A/V Preamplifier
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 03, 2003]
Cosmo
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very precise, very accurate and neutral. It reveals flaws in setup with great transparancy. It has many functions, good remote controller, nice option to run strictly on battery mode.
Weakness:
The MC-circuit is quite sensitive, but the quality of it is not good enough. Bass is almost not present, and when boosting bass, sound becomes ... fuzzy. I tested with aid of an Onkyo P308 from end 80'ies, which had a better(!) MC circuit! The circuit is simply not good enough for a dedicated listener. Too bad I bought it for this exact option, which of course affects my valuation. This preamp is great! I like it's particular untouched sound (tone control can be defeated), and nice slim design. For the money I spent on it, it is truly exceptional. Technics has produced a variety of products of different qualities, but this thing is in the really good end! Similar Products Used: Onkyo P308 |
[Apr 08, 2003]
ilgatto
AudioPhile
Strength:
SUC 1000 preamp: ALL SUA 1000 power amp: Dynamics, lot of power, great bass extension, midband frequency clarity.
Weakness:
SUC 1000 preamp NONE SUA 1000 power amp: slight hardening in voices at very high volume level tha could determine only a fatigue in long hearing without a really distorsion. SUC 1000: no audible noise in battery pack mode. Lot of detail in instruments. Multiinstrumentals tracks are well definied. Midband frequencies are so soft. No compression. SEA 1000 power amp: DYNAMICS! a lot of power but you could hear some hardeding at high levels. Not a really distorsion but a sort of slight hardening in voice. Anyway if you have efficient speaker (90db or more) you should not worry of volume level. You can't turn up the volume over 30% or policemans will be soon in your house. It is a little loose in hard bass in reference to my rotel 980bx (hip hop, techno, but it'snt my music). Similar Products Used: LUXMAN 105u, HK 6800, Hitachi 5700, Mcintosh 2225, Rotel 970bx/cx, Rotel 990cx/980bx, NAD 2200, NAD C160, NAD c270, Nad C350, Technics SUA900, and so on. |
[Mar 05, 2000]
Franco Lucignani
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound quality, transparent, very stable stereo image, never confused also in simphonic orchestra "pienissimo", silent on both ac and battery operation (this last I use only for phono audition)
Weakness:
Actually none, it never failed the operation in over two years, the battery seems in good shape and I never had to change it until now. Very good opportunity to have a piece of component cheap, well realised, with advanced technology of operation and an exceptional sound quality. Similar Products Used: None previously I had integrated amplifiers only. |
[Jan 31, 1999]
mike morris
an Audiophile
This pre is a honey/sleeper with a dual personality. It has the option to be operated in a dc mode; whenever the battery is engaged the background noisedrops appreciably. I normally listen in ac mode and reserve the dc/battery |
[Jan 10, 2000]
Lm nmyg
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Able to express the music/song details faithfully even without the selection of Battery Drive Power Supply(BDPS)mode
Weakness:
DC batteries compartment need charging after approximately 8 hours of operations in BDPS mode I was amazed to notice of how good this pre-amp sound when I compared to other more expensive amp. Treble, bass and vocal are well expressed. Even with the Battery Drive Power Supply mode off(this is a button for you to select for DC power drive to the unit for serious sound performance), the R-core transformer designed power-amp never diappoint me. But when BDPS is selected, be aware, the background now more silent with good clarity of musical details which I think may on par or even embarass some higher price amp. Considering the price, this is one worthy amp to audit. |