Arcam AVR100 A/V Receivers
Arcam AVR100 A/V Receivers
[Feb 21, 2001]
Mark Shaffer
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Fantastic Sound
Weakness:
Limited speaker setups Not all the "extras" for the price point (£800), but it does sound fantastic. Similar Products Used: Rotel, Sony |
[Jul 04, 2001]
Chauncy Rivers
Audiophile
Weakness:
bass management, power for HT, build quality I just boxed this unit up and will be taking it back tomorrow. I had this unit for 3 weeks and it plays ok. I was not impressed with the 2 channel sound that this board raves about and I thought it was grossly underpowered and strained in 5 channel mode. The remote is a joke. I find this unit's build quality fair, this unit is very light! I bought it for $999, Arcam just lowered the price by $200 on the retail price. I guess they are not selling a lot or people are complaining that its about the same as the NAD and they are lossing business to NAD. There are better units that do a better job for less money. If people think that this unit is 5 stars, what is a B&K 307 or Denon 5800? Similar Products Used: been threw to many receivers and amps w/pres |
[May 12, 2001]
Michael Saxtoft
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
OK sound in both audio and video
Weakness:
you can get the NAD T760 for only US$882 - it is some 95% the same amplifier I bought the AVR 100 a few months ago expecting the usual Arcam style in sound, features and look. Similar Products Used: Arcam AV50, Arcam Alpha 10 DAVE+2xArcam Alpha 10 3P |
[Nov 19, 2001]
Sat Bhambrah
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
amazing sound, simplicity of set up, design
Weakness:
a little under powered, but still so sweet This review is actually for the new AVR200, basically this unit look identical except for a descrete Dolby Pro-logic II logo. From a technical perspective the AVR200 has 5 digital inputs rather than 3. It also has another S-video conection and digital output. The pre-amp layout has been improved, as have the set up menus. But the biggest change is Dolby Pro-Logic II, there are 5 more sound fields. Similar Products Used: AVR100, |
[Jan 05, 2002]
Martin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
2 channel sound
Weakness:
only 90 watts per channel in 2 channel stereo sound i paid 2500 for the combo dv-88 and avr100. Over all i am happy with the set. I wish i had a little more reseves on my stereo set up. I am drving the b&w804n with the avr100 and it is simply not enough power. I am thinking of adding the arcam a85 power amp to bi-wire the 804. Not sure if that will give me enough power to drive the 804. For plain surround sound the dv88, avr100 combo is perfect. make sure you do not pick too big of speakers to drive them and make sure that you pick speaker in the 90dB-91dB range it will help. For new buyers definalty get the dv88, avr200 set. Similar Products Used: marantz |
[May 24, 2001]
Steven
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Warm sound, good soundstage, nice design
Weakness:
Limited controls, power is fine for my steup, but some may want more muscle: by Arcam's P85 amps... Many over-enthusiastic reviews have been misleading and have obviously exagerated everyone's expectations. It is NOT perfect. But it DOES sound very different then a Yamaha, Sony, Denon, Rotel or even a NAD. Yes it shares the same basic platform as the Nad T760, but if you sit down and listen to both units, you will see that the tho units do not sound the same. It is a question of taste. Is it worth the extra dollars? Maybe for some, not for others. Similar Products Used: Nad t760, Nad AV316, Arcam Alpha 7, Rotel RSX 965 & 972 |
[May 25, 2001]
John
Audiophile
Apparently anyone who likes this unit is an Arcam sales person................so opinionated and narrow minded. Anyway, no one is being mislead, everyone can listen for themselves, I did and here's what I found. The Arcam sounds far and away better in 2 channel than the NAD ( not even close) much better than the Marantz 8000...the best way to describe this one was that it was warm, almost muddy and veiled. The one I liked best next to the Arcam was the Nakamichi AV10. Does the Arcam kick butt in HT....not even close, but it is sufficient to do the job, and in stereo, where it shines, is where music sounds like it should. Read the review in the latest edition of Home Theater Sound...................they said it is the best receiver EVER, hands down. But then again, to say that, they MUST be Arcam salesman, so nevermind!!! |
[Feb 06, 2001]
Andrew MacNeil
Audiophile
Strength:
Elegant design, solid build quality, and sounds beautiful in both stereo and 5.1.
Weakness:
Remote and lack-of component video. Life is good. First, the movie industry is now consistently producing titles that are worthy of the DVD format. Secondly, Arcam has produced an AV receiver that focuses solely on performance - no unnecessary bells and whistles that would just clutter a clean design. Similar Products Used: Auditioned the AVR100 directly against Denon, Rotel, and Yamaha AV receivers. |
[Feb 06, 2001]
SW
Audiophile
Strength:
Very dynamic sound, very smooth as well. Great for 2-channel audio.
Weakness:
None so far I thought I was happy with the Marantz until the day I heard this baby over at a friends who had just picked one up. After listening to the Arcam and the way it manhandled both 2-channel audio as well as DVD's I knew I had to get my hands on one. The Arcam is particuarly impressive in bringing out the very low-level details on various DVD's. Performance on 2-channel audio was just as impressive, as I've never heard a receiver that could bring out such a deep soundstage while making you feel as if you are right there in the studio. The imaging and presentation of various cd's is stunning, probably due to the mating of the Arcam CD-72 with the AVR100. This receiver brings out the best in my NHT's with plenty of power to spare. I haven't even fully burned it in yet, but it is easily the best HT rceiver in it's price range IMO. I haven't even finished building my HT setup yet. I can only imagine what it will be like once I have a full setup to fully take advantage of the capablities of this receiver. My current setup is: Similar Products Used: Marantz SR7000 |
[Oct 10, 2001]
Miguel Bioucas
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good construction (the way the boards are connected to the main board), good sound exept for some hum
Weakness:
Well the hum, and the clicks when you change volume When you select a stereo source (if there is no signal is easier to notice this) even if the volume is at 0db there is an hum in the central and a little less in the read speakers and if the level is higer then 73db it is also in the front speakers. Similar Products Used: Nad T751 |