Denon AVR-1700 A/V Receivers
Denon AVR-1700 A/V Receivers
[Dec 08, 1998]
Matt
an Audio Enthusiast
I just picked this receiver up today and so far so good. It has very crisp sound, albeit without the extra 10 watts/channel you get from the AVR-2700. The only difference between this and the AVR-2700 is 10 watts/channel and S-video inputs. For $200 less, I chose this model. Since I have a DSS receiver, I just run my S-video straight from the unit to the AVR-1700. And as for the 10 watts per channel, I'm just building my system, so by the time I have enough money to get all the speakers I want, I will just buy an amp to add-on. I'm very pleased with the current output. |
[Jan 10, 1999]
Ian
a Casual Listener
This receiver is actually my first 'major' receiver I've ever bought (used to have just mini systems). The 1700 altho released in Canada, has made it's way down here to the US I guess. I bought one new recently US $500 (see rest of system), after spending a couple days wandering around in specialty stores, soaking up knowledge online from everything. |
[Jan 19, 1999]
John L. Pereira
an Audio Enthusiast
I had a JVC 884 Digital Dolby receiver and was generally satisfied with it. It was a satisfactory unit as long as I didn't audition it to any other receivers with my system. That is until I got the Denon. Previous to the JVC I had an Onkyo, which was only a stereo receiver. |
[Jan 09, 1999]
paul mcgowan
a Casual Listener
am looking for some paradigms and a receiver. the dealer packaged them with the denon 1700... it was more money than the yamaha 595 i was looking at but wthe two seemed to be quite similar. think i will get the 595 yamaha instead but the guy gave me a pretty good price in canadian dollars... |
[Jul 12, 1999]
Dave
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had my AVR-1700 now for about 2 weeks and it sounds GREAT! As a former Nak owner I strongly recommend this Denon. I bought mine at United Audio for $475. |
[Jul 16, 1999]
pong roongrote
a Casual Listener
I had this unit for a month. I really enjoy its performance.one problem that I found is that my receiver turns hot...even I spent only 30 minutes watching movie or listen to the music. |
[Jul 24, 1999]
Jason Chen
an Audio Enthusiast
It's an excellent receiver in its class. The circuitry is very clean, even better than the much more expensive Harman Kardon AVR-85. HK makes pop sound when you change volume when the Denon is very quite. The only deficiency I see in this receiver is the lack of S-Video connectors. I still give it a 5 stars all things considered. |
[Aug 09, 1999]
Dasacom
an Audio Enthusiast
A great sounding receiver for its price. I bought mine used for $500 Canadian. I have it set up with Mission 734 mains, a Mission AS-1 sub, and some crappy homemade surround and centre channel speakers. The sound is quite clean compared to my old Technics receiver. Having the 5-channel equal power really adds to the realism of the various surround effects.I hope to get a DVD soon so I can test out Dolby Digital. |
[Aug 30, 1999]
Mark R
an Audio Enthusiast
I got my first system a month ago and the 1700 is the powerhouse. I have it running Cerwin-Vega 12"s and it sounds very good. 70 watts may seem small, but it is RMS power not peak and it pushes the 12s just fine! Its crisp, clear and I'm very happy with it for $480 US. I was a little concerned about the brand, I hadn't heard of DENON before but a friend assured me of the quality. |
[Sep 06, 1999]
Gabriel
an Audio Enthusiast
I have recently purchased the 1700. I find that is very easy to like. The D/A converters sound better than by older Rotel. Setup is easy. I like the three digital inputs. However, I would have prefered all three to be coxial. I have all Klipsch speakers except the subwoofer.Front - Cornwalls |