JVC RX-884VBK A/V Receivers
JVC RX-884VBK A/V Receivers
[Feb 08, 1999]
Richard Brocaw
an Audio Enthusiast
I had one of these 884's for about 30 days... and then returned it to the storeand upgraded to a Yamaha 992. I found the 884 to be a cheaply built unit, very |
[Aug 13, 2000]
Ryan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lots of features; like the banana jacks for the speakers, like the s-video option on all the video sources
Weakness:
extremely low power. audible hiss. gets warm quickly I think that this is a good value, but agree with most others that have posted on this site that the power seems to lack for a 110Wx5 rating. I wasn't sure if this was with my reciever, but can now see that others are having the low power like mine. My brother in law has a Sony Dolby Digital reciever (not sure of the model number, Not an ES though) and it would easily get twice as loud for less wattage rating. Similar Products Used: Pioneer VSX-455; Older Marantz 1550 |
[Jul 30, 2000]
Kevin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, Features
Weakness:
Hiss I have been using this unit for more than a year. I bought it so that I could have money also for a DVD player and a larger television. Similar Products Used: None |
[Mar 26, 1999]
John Pereira
an Audio Enthusiast
People use your ears. This product is awful if sound matters to you. The sound is thin and brittle and has lots of hiss in the surrond modes, including both Dolby modes. The D/A converters in it are also pathetic. |
[Apr 05, 1999]
B. Kemp
a Casual Listener
I purchased my JVC-884 receiver from ubid for $310 about six weeks ago. My overall impression of the product is mixed. First the good: For $310 bucks you get a receiver that fills most novice HT needs. S video, Dolby Digital, and enough amplification to irritate neighbors a block away. The bad: The receiver does get hot, (I might put a small fan in back, to help this.) there's a hissing that gets progressively worse at volumes excedding 60, rear speaker output is lacking some punch, and the FM receiver blows. Overall I think it's OK, but if I had to do it all over again, I beleive I'd spend another $150 bucks and get a HK75. |
[Aug 19, 1999]
Jim
an Audio Enthusiast
Can't beat it for the price ($299) which explains my four star rating. For those starting off in Home Theater this is definitely a good start without clearing out your bank account. My wife and son now prefer to stay home and rent dvd/tapes than to go out and put up with the crowds, expensive popcorn, and distorted sound. |
[Aug 19, 1999]
Eric Smith
an Audio Enthusiast
The JVC RX-884vbk is a fine performer. Ive written reviews on the JBL TLX-181 speakers, Velodyne CT-120 subwoofer,which I both gave good reviews. I recently returned the Velodyne though for a Hsu Research TN1225HO true subwoofer because of the sheer difference in power (87dbls@25Hz vs 108dbls@25Hz)and all because its being driven by a very good receiver. The sound in Dolby Digital is superb for Home Theater on a budget. I did have a hissing problem when I first got it but that was because I did'nt adjust and properly calibrate my system. I would highly recommend the DVD "Video Essentials". It's a bit expensive ($50.00) but its worth it and you'll love your receiver for it. You will also need a Radio Shack SPL meter for adjustments. I found that I had the surround levels way too high and adjusted it down to +2db. I also had my surrounds aimed right at the listening position, sort of in a criss-cross set-up. That was obviously wrong, they should be lined up the same way the front right,center and left speaker should be so, the surrounds should be facing directly front of the listening position. That cut out all the hiss. Musically the receiver sounds very clean and clear from bass to treble with the help of Monster reference 2 interconnects. |
[Sep 15, 1998]
DaveC
an Audiophile
In one word - VALUE. Featurewise, this thing blows the competition away: it has tons of inputs, including multiple digital ins and s-video switching, a decent Dolby Digital decoder, good solid 5-way binding posts all around, and a fairly intuitive on-screen menu system. A little rough around the edges in terms of build quality and ergonomics, but hey, this is a CHEAP A/V receiver... The only things seriously lacking in this department are a set of discrete 6 channel inputs (for an outboard DTS decoder, say) and a set of 5 channel preamp outs for a big external amp. |
[Sep 22, 1998]
Dan Harmer
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased this receiver for $329 (demo model). I'm pretty pleased with the sound, in fact, along with a good powered subwoofer the sound is great. Sure you could pay $300 - $400 more and get a Denon or a Sony STR30ESG (which I'd like to have), but for the difference in cost I can almost buy my DVD player. This thing is packed with features (2 optical inputs, 1 coaxial digital input, 5 S-video inputs, on-screen menus) all for much less ($350-$425)? How can you go wrong? Try and get all that in something else for the price. Anyway, I recommend it for an entry-level piece. If you're looking for super high quality sound, then what are you doing reading this anyway? I like it and give it 4 thumbs up. |
[Jul 24, 2001]
Robert Bean
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great digital sound, more inputs than you would ever need. Price.
Weakness:
Gets hot after extended use. DSP effects are pretty useless. Overall, this is an amazing reciver for the $230 I paid. I have it hooked up digitally to my Sound Blaster Live in my computer. Mine used to overload and have horrible rear channel sound when I first got it, but I fixed that :) I opened it up and found a spot on the mainboard where the solder had run together and connected two things that weren't supposed to be connected. I used a knife to break the solder, and all the problems went away. It hasn't overloaded since, and the rear channel sounds much better. |