Kenwood VR-2080 A/V Receivers
Kenwood VR-2080 A/V Receivers
[Dec 15, 1998]
gerardo huertas
an Audio Enthusiast
Kenwood VR-2080 |
[Feb 01, 1999]
mark casey
an Audio Enthusiast
looks good,sounds good,priced good. many features |
[Jan 28, 1999]
Patrick Hansson
a Casual Listener
I purchased the VR-2080 because of its supposed overall value. I am here to report to you that the problems that I have had with this reciever are amazing. I purchased the unit five months ago and was very pleased until I had a problem with it. I had to take it to an authorized service center (two hours away) drop it off for 3 weeks to have them tell me they could not fix it. Kenwoods customer service was not willing to help me in any way. I then had to go pick it up (two hours away again,) and send it to another dealer for replacemnt. ($51.00 for shipping). They are going to replace the unit, but I am afraid I might have the same problems again. I feel that Kenwood did NOTHING to help me and would never purchase another Kenwood product again. |
[Apr 08, 1999]
Phil
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased the VR-2080 approximately a month and a half ago from the local Circuit City. I must admit that in the store the receiver sounded all right, and for $699, I found it a great value since it included Dolby Digital as well as DTS. Upon taking the receiver home I hooked it up and found installation to be a breeze, as well as setup, save for the lack of OSD and the cumbersome nature of the remote control. Initially, the lack of spatial imaging from the receiver(which I had on previous receiver, a 15 year old Yamaha RV-9) seemed obtrusive, but I decided a break in period may be necessary although most will tell you that solid state electronics do not require the aforementioned break in period. After a week of listening to the unit, the imaging had not improved and thus, being an optimist, I decided to wait for another week before making a decision as to return the receiver. The receiver did not make it to the end of the second week; the subwoofer output on the unit quit on me(i had it hooked to the Velodyne 1210). This fact, alond with the fact that the receiver completely lacked any type of imaging, forced me to return it. After doing so, I considered the Yamaha RX-V995, but eventually purchased the RX-V2095, for reasons mentioned in my review on the 2095. For anyone considering purchasing the RV-2080, please be adivised of the problems I and many others have had. I have nothing against Kenwood products as I have a Kenwood X-Celon CD player in my car, but when it comes to home theater and music reproduction, the VR-2080 does not sastify. |
[Apr 30, 1999]
mike
an Audiophile
nice reciever, remote is a little slow |
[Jun 01, 1999]
Bill
an Audio Enthusiast
Recently purchased the VR-2080 to replace a Sony STR-GX909ES (hated to see it go) because I felt it was time to jump on the DD & DTS bandwagon. All that I can say is that I'm glad I made the switch. I've read a lot of complaints about the cumbersome remote, and to some extent it is, but I'm not going to hold anything against the VR-2080 because of this. Call me crazy but I've never considered buying a receiver based on the remote, in fact I can honestly say that I had used my Sony's remote a total of ten times in five years. I also love the simplistic look and feel of the receiver. With ample power, good looks (to me)and built in DD & DTS decoding this is truly a nice receiver. |
[May 31, 1999]
LC168
an Audiophile
Who designed this piece of junk? If you want to get a migraine headache and lose sleep then please buy this receiver! I spent three nights trying to get the LCD remote to work!!!AC-3 does not work well |
[Jun 11, 1999]
Mike Pry
an Audio Enthusiast
Don't even think about buying this receiver. Stupid me, who after reading the bad reviews and problems with the receiver, still went out and bought one because the damn thing looks cool and so does the remote. One month later I start to hear an occasional clipping noise. One week after that and now all I hear is the clipping noise. I am going to attempt to return it and find another brand. I had a buzzing problem with the Kenwood 1080 :( |
[Jun 11, 1999]
Allen
an Audio Enthusiast
Bad product. The remote looks cool, and performs badly, if at all. Within a week the DSP for the DTS and digital dolby fried. I took it back and bought a Sony Elite. |
[Jun 29, 1999]
Jeff Nickel
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased this receiver just after christmas as a present to myself. I must admit, I was initially swayed by the the receiver's looks and the uniqueness of the remote. While this receiver accomplishes its mission dutifully as a medium priced Dolby Digital/DTS Home Theater Receiver, Kenwood could have addressed a few issues to make this a truly outstanding receiver for the price. First to the praises. The cosmetic apeal is a breath of fresh air. I have the matching CD player (CD-2260M) and I am hoping to purchase the matching DVD player (KR-2070) soon. Put together they look outstanding. I love music more than I do movies, so the matching CD player was a must. The VR-2080's remote can actually display the CD and track titles from any of the 200 CDs in the 2260M. If you like 200 disc changers, the combination of the two is an outstanding feature of the 2080. Kenwood also makes a 5 disc changer with CD Text that has similar compatibility to the 2080. While this receiver is decent in the music department, where the 2080 really shines is in its Dolby Digital and DTS modes. This is an incredibly quiet unit, producing both highs and low with punch and clairity. Using a Panasonic A120 DVD player, movies can literaly envelope you with sound played through this receiver. With 100Wx5, it has more than enough power to handle soundtracks and special effects. DTS playback is equally remarkable. While I have not watched a DTS encoded DVD, I have played a DTS CD. The fidelity was outstanding as was the dynamic range. I am looking forward to more DTS CDs. Dolby Pro Logic recording was also good with clean separation between the front and rear channels. The 5 DSP modes depend on your tastes. I generally do not use them with two exceptions. I found the "Cathedral" mode enjoyable for listening to Bach's organ music and I enjoyed the "Arena" settings for listening to live rock concert recordings. I personally like these environmental enhancements for listen to some music. But like many things, this is a matter of personal taste |