Kenwood VR-309 A/V Receivers
Kenwood VR-309 A/V Receivers
[Jul 11, 1999]
Emin
an Audio Enthusiast
I've been using VR-309 for a week now and must conclude that despite all the shorcomings I'm describing below, the bottom line is this piece of equipment is excellent, especially for the money. The quality of sound it outputs is very decent; I've had a chance to compare it to a pair of Sony and one HK: both Sony sounded almost the same, if not slightly worse, the HK had a better "soundstage" but only with certain music played. However, all three units cost more (HK -- significantly more) than Kenmore. And get this -- none of these guys had DTS! |
[Jul 11, 1999]
Dale
a Casual Listener
I upgraded my Kenwood system to a VR-309 from the 1060 receiver. I was antipating a DVD purchase soon, therefore the VR-309 features were attractive. |
[Aug 07, 1999]
Paul DeMay
a Casual Listener
Had the unit only a very short time. Got it from Circuit City for $329. I purchased it because I was looking for S-Video switching and digital inputs. If you are buying this for the S-Video switching, be prepared to lose a lot in the quality department. Going through the Kenwood, my video looked worse than compostie video with big white lines scrolling through the picture. Not what I was looking for from my S-Video inputs. I took it back and got the Sony 935 which is a great amp at only $100 or so more than the Kenwood. I also took the Sony back and got a JVC 888, but that's a different story... |
[Aug 03, 1999]
Jeff Nickel
an Audio Enthusiast
I owned the VR-309 for only a month for use while me normal receiver, a VR-2080, was in the shop. The 309 served as a quite adaquate temp receiver. I liked the S-Video switching, 100Wx5, Dolby Digital, and DTS for under $400. (You can find it under $300 if you look hard enough.) The value is simply unbeatable. The sound quality was good, but lacking some bass. Dolby Digital, Pro-Logic, and DTS playback were all good. Stereo wasn't great, but good speakers and a powered subwoofer will help this system a lot. I personally don't care about the lack of ambiance modes. The remote is good. Worked will with all of my components, including a Panasonic VCR, Panasonic DVD player, a Kenwood 200 disc CD changer, and a digital cable receiver. Worked really well with the Kenwood CD changer. Overall, sound quality was good, not great. It was very easy to use and setup. But for the price it can't be beat. |
[Aug 17, 1999]
Jarrod K. Wright
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had this unit for about a month now and really, really enjoy it. I'm not a gadget freak, so I knew going in that I didn't want a receiver that had all sorts of bells and whistles -- such as those annoying listening modes -- that you use once and then forget about. What I wanted was a solid, reliable DD/DTS receiver with S-Video switching and real banana plug speaker connections for an inexpensive price, and I definitely got what I was looking for with this receiver. |
[Sep 02, 1999]
John
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned a 1080VR which I beleive came with the same remote that I have seen people posting about here. I found the remote to be sleek and efficient. While I can't comment on available documentation for programming and use, I can say that I had no problems setting the remote up for use with my components at the time. And setting up macros was just as easy. As for the poist regarding the dispaly of vcr1- vcr3 on the OSD when you cycle thru video components, be aware that these are the default video devices. Once you program a specific device as a video component (such as a DVD player), this will change to from VCR to DVD, or the appropriate component on the OSD. |
[Nov 15, 1999]
Jack Tan
Casual Listener
Overall, a pretty decent receiver that handles DD/DTS for a decent price. The remote is cumbersome to say the least. |
[Nov 21, 1999]
John Sexton
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great value, good clarity (slightly scratchy top end)
Weakness:
can sound weak A great value when purchased as a home theater system. |
[Dec 13, 1999]
Kevin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price
Weakness:
No sound fields for music It may be a cheap way to get Dolby Digital and DTS but with no sound fields for music I am disappointed. I am returning this receiver and searching for another. To bad the Teac 9100 doesn't have DTS. Similar Products Used: Teac 9100 |
[Feb 11, 2000]
David Heyde
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great price, easy to use
Weakness:
Not enough sound fields, remote This is a excellent buy for anyone who is tight on cash. I purchased mine from Crutchfield for $299.00, and am loving it. The remote is a little cumbersome, and I wish the receiver had more listening choices or fields....much like Sony's recievers.....but for 299.00 Brand New....who cares. If you are looking for an inexpensive quality Dolby Digital/DTS reciever...this is it! I highly recommend!!!! Similar Products Used: Kenwood VR 307, Old Pioneer stereo receiver |