Marantz SR-18 A/V Receivers
Marantz SR-18 A/V Receivers
[Nov 19, 1999]
Mike
Audiophile
Strength:
sound and dynamics, remote
Weakness:
less features than comparable models I went looking for a new receiver and the store had all three hooked up to the same speaker system. I would rate the Yamaha the lowest out of the three for sound. I tested all three using cd's and music DVD's so don't know about performance on movies. The Yamaha sounded too bright and colored the music. The Denon sounded too neutral where the music came out kind of flat and lifeless. The Marantz, which I would rate first sound-wise, had the most dynamic sound. The music that came out was extremely life-like and reveiled more details than the other two. Also the sound stage it presented was much deeper and layered where I could separate the distance between the main vocalist and and the back-up singers. The Marantz was also better at locating instruments and vocalists between speakers giving a more real sound stage. However, I do like the Yamaha for its 7.1 channels and the Denon for the two set of surround speakers and the 5 speaker stereo mode. So if you are more of a music person and not so much a tech guy than the Marantz would be your chioce. The Marantz also had a better remote than the other two. Similar Products Used: Yamaha DSP-A1, Denon 5700 |
[Nov 18, 1999]
Pat
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build quality, sonic performance, beautiful cosmetics, extremely low distortion at all levels.
Weakness:
On screen menu activation causes momentary "flash" when making adjustments. My SR-18 is set up in a 300 sq ft room. The room is fully tiled with sheet rock walls, a large area rug, 3 seater fabric couch and easy chair. This is a very "live" room. Similar Products Used: Onkyo, Pioneer, Yamaha, blah, blah, blah. NOTHING comes close to the fit finish and feel of the SR-18! |
[Sep 08, 1999]
Bruce
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had the SR-18 now for 4 months and I can tell you this is the cleanest sounding receiver on the market today. I have them pushing KEF TDM-THX Surround System and the soundstage is incredible. The KEF's are not the best speakers for music but the SR-18 makes them shine. Not many bells and whistles but I will take this recever over many components costing twice as much. |
[Dec 18, 2001]
Dimitrios Stathopoulos
Casual Listener
Strength:
Unbelievable audio, did I mention unbelievable audio
Weakness:
Doesn't switch to analog audio input if a digital signal isn't present Well I finally did it, got my hands on the reciever I have wanted for 2 years now. A friend at work bought the SR-9200 and offered me the SR-18 at a price I couldn't turn down. Similar Products Used: nothing in the price range |
[Oct 27, 2001]
Al
Audiophile
Strength:
Music quality, rock solid construction, nice look
Weakness:
Manual may need some rework.
Similar Products Used: Many mid-range Yamaha, Pioneer, Marantz receivers |
[Dec 23, 2001]
Brian Dolezalek
Audiophile
Strength:
Incredible sound, indistinguishable from the sound quality from a system with separates
Weakness:
50 pounds heavy; only a flat surface or a stereo cabinet will support this puppy. A shelf is out of the question unless its made of oak or some other hardwood INTRODUCTION Similar Products Used: JVC RX-8000V |
[Oct 06, 2001]
Hish
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
2-Channel stereo!! Big, heavy and beautiful to look at. Awesome remote!
Weakness:
????? Well, this is an upgrade from the Marantz SR-19. Right away, I noticed instruments in the backgroung on 2-channel that I never heard before. The extra 20 watts and larger transformer really make an improvement when compared to the SR-19. Similar Products Used: Yamaha RXV-596, Marantz SR-19 |
[May 04, 1999]
TPS
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had this unit for two days, and it is exceptional. The sound is the best I've heard. Period. The remote is excellent(RC-18SR,identical to RC2000MKII) and the receiver was a breeze to set up. I returned two ROTEL RSX-965's(poor quality control) before deciding to pre-order this unit. The ROTEL sounds very good, but it doesn't even compare with this unit. It's extremely easy to use, all the connections you could ever want,tons of power,and it runs cool(no fan,unlike DENON 5700). If you're in the market for a set-up in this price range, you should definitely check one out. |
[May 29, 1999]
Johnny Smith
an Audiophile
I got a chance to hear marantz new SR 18 receiver and i have to say that i'm dissapointed, the problem that i have with it is that the DD processor does not sound good, i compared it to my DP870 DD processor which marantz also makes, and the DP870 is way more dynamic than the SR 18. I'm not saying that i would not get this unit but i would use my DP870 with. This monster of a receiver has alot going for it, but it will have to prove that it can over power my MA500 (made by marantz) mono blocks connected to my SR870 receiver also from marantz, as you can see i like marantz components. I use three MA500s to run three of my paradigm reference speakers, CC450 for center duty studio 20s for surrounds and studio 100s for left and Right powered by a Hafler P4000. I'm going spend some more time with the SR18 and if it can do better than my MA500s i may get it and keep my hafler and DP870 DD receiver. For now i have to give the SR18 3 rating, i hope after listening to it more i can give it a 5. I will follow up. |
[Jun 07, 1999]
SLR
an Audio Enthusiast
Forgive me to differ with some of the opinions below but the SR-18 is awesome. I had the chance to test it out with a set of B&W 603's and a little tiny Mirage sub, and it rocked. I tested it out with the DTS demo disc #3, and was floored. For HT I can't see a better piece. |