Marantz SR-4000 A/V Receivers
Marantz SR-4000 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 10, 2001]
C T
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Awesome Sound! Awesome Sound! Awesome Sound! Awesome Sound!
Weakness:
Annoying to hook up speakers to binding posts - This receiver is DA BOMB! THe sound is great! The old sony and pioneer that I have dont even come close to the sound quality of the sr-4000. I highly recommend if u want to spend around $400. Havent hooked it up in surround yet, but 2 channel sounds great! Similar Products Used: sony receiver str-d611(10 yrs old) - it sucks! |
[Dec 15, 1999]
Michael DiMartini
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Quality, quality, quality. Beutiful sounding in ac3, and in stereo.
Weakness:
No DTS, but 5.1 inputs, no cinema EQ, but has night mode and loudness mode. Excellent reciever friends. Power and quality of sound is incredible. Swithing to ac3 was easy and very quick. Stereo sound is great also, very clear and impressive. I got it for 431.00 if some one finds a better price e-mail me. Similar Products Used: Onkyo tsdx-474, sherwood 7090 |
[Dec 26, 1999]
Steve Ritter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound quality,power,electronics/menu/memory
Weakness:
menu a Little confusing at first. manual Awesome reciever! don't let the power Similar Products Used: yamaha rxv-392 |
[Jul 07, 2001]
S Null
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wonderful Sound Stage, Pure and Refined Bass, Treble and Mids, Well Built, Great Value
Weakness:
Clip Plugs for Surrounds (Come on Marantz!!) Other than that, Nothing!! With out a doubt, this is truely the best Reciever in its class!! I stumbled on some luck (so to speak) when I purchased an SR-3000, and had problems with it. After an ordeal, Marantz (Customer service was GREAT!!!) replaced my SR-3000 with an SR-4000. There is no doubt in my mind that after hearing this receiver, it is worth every penny it truely cost. I had been shopping Digital Receivers in this price range, and nothing compares. Although some of the other makes (i.e. HK, Onkyo, Yamaha) offer DTS in this catagory, the sound from the Marantz can not be beat. And with a 3 year waranty to boot, you can't go wrong!! I highly recomend this reciever to anyone!! Similar Products Used: Sony, Harman Kardon, Onkyo, Denon |
[Mar 04, 2001]
Cy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great Sound, build quality, easy setup, remote
Weakness:
none
|
[Mar 04, 2001]
Roland
Casual Listener
Strength:
build quality, great sound, barely gets warm
Weakness:
the setup menu takes a little getting used to I was debating between the Marantz and a comparable Onkyo and Harmon Kardon. The Sony AV receiver I had ran very hot and the surround channels quit. So I was really concerned about reliability. Even though the Onkyo was $100 cheaper for comparable specs I picked the Marantz (three year warranty). Also the reviews on this website favored the Marantz over Harmon Kardon. The more I use the receiver the more I am glad I picked it, absolutely no buyer's remorse. I think it sounds great, even though I am no audiophile. Similar Products Used: Sony |
[Jan 09, 2001]
Jamil
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
This machine is very simple
Weakness:
no speaker AB This stereo sounds really, really good. I had purchased a Sony STR-DE845 and that sounded good. After reading numerous reviews about how bad Sony receivers are built I decided to get a Marantz. Jesus, am I glad I took the Sony back. Who needs a bunch of extra DPS music environments that sound like crap? Go with the Marantz for solid 2 channel sound and you won't be disappointed. Otherwise, roll the dice and buy a Sony... Similar Products Used: Pioneer, Sony |
[Jun 08, 2000]
Ivan T.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound, compact controls, good
Weakness:
only one optical input, no a/b switch This is my first decent receiver, so I'm not an expert audiophile by any stretch of the imagination, but I know good sound when I hear it. I looked around at a bunch of different brands within the $400 price range, including Sony, Yamaha, Pioneer, and Harmon Kardon (most of which are over $600). Sony doesn't even come close to the sound quality of this machine, although it has a lot of bells and whistles, most of which I could do without anyway. The Yamaha, specifically the 5150 was originally my first choice, but after listening to the Marantz at the store I was hooked on it. Now I understand why this brand is considered one of the best. I was very close to getting a Harmon Kardon, but the price range for some of the models I looked at were a bit steep for me. Also, I've been reading a lot of postings on this board about how H/K receeivers overheat and break a lot, so I went with the Marantz. I know there are better models, but you really got to fork out the dough for them, and in my opinion this machine outperforms some of the higher priced Sonys and Yamahas. I was amazed at the incredible sound from this thing. I can hear sounds on my old cds I never even knew were there ( I had an old low end stereo). Similar Products Used: Sony, Aiwa |
[May 02, 2000]
D
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound This receiver has everything that matters: binding posts for front speakers and center speaker, 6-ch input, DD, Digital in/out. Similar Products Used: Pioneer 498, vintage Marantz receiver, Pioneer D3s, Technics AX6, Keenwood 206 |
[Apr 24, 2000]
Jonathan Harding
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Musical, Power,Aesthetics
Weakness:
No s-video switching, No DTS, only 3 sets of binding posts and two spring, only takes raw wire and bannana not spades, uneven power in hall mode. Over I would say I am happy with this product. I think for the money it is def. one of the top mass-market receivers. I spent a lot of time debating whether to get a stereo system or a home theater system. That is why this unit jumped out at me. It has very good 2 channel musical quality. It has plenty of power in stereo mode. It has binding posts for the 3 front channels. I would have to agree with what has been said before - This is a very musical receiver. It has superb sound clarity and range. It handles digital inputs very well. It has a ton of feedback when I turn the rear channels up very loud. Usually for home theater you don't need to do this though. Similar Products Used: Onkyo 474, several Harmon Kardon, higher end 2 channel seperate systems(NAD,Audio Research,rotel,creek,etc) |