Marantz SR8200 A/V Receivers
Marantz SR8200 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 16, 2004]
mazspeed
AudioPhile
Strength:
Sound and options. and build quality
Weakness:
Remote is power hungry I looked at almost every receiver in the 2k and under group. I found this to be warm and detalied sounding. The remote is great, but does eat lots of power, and you have to change batteries every 2 months or so of useage. Sounds cleaner and better then the others in this price point, and quite a bit above this price point. Similar Products Used: Denon 3803, Pan Elites, Lexicon, Onkyo |
[Jan 10, 2004]
bjm
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
This reciever has just about all of the bells and whistles including a great number of multichannel formats. It has a clean appearance with an easy to use front panel. Easy set-up for speakers etc. Seems well-built---though not up to the standards Marantz offered in the 1960's and 1970's.
Weakness:
1) Poor FM 2) Remote control is not intuitive to use. 3) Amplifiers are flat sounding. I realize I am going against the grain of all of the other reviewers here, but to be blunt I really didn't care for this receiver at all in my set-up. My original goal was to reduce the pile of amps and other separates (Mcintosh) in my living room and have a nice neat system with good sound. And, having had a good experience with a Marantz 2250 reciever in the 70's, I was inclined to buy another Marantz. I read lots of magazine and internet reviews all of which expressed glowing terms for the SR8200. I listened to it at a local dealer---which honestly had a very poor showroom set-up, However, liking what I saw, I bought it.---I really did want to like this reciever. The difficulties for me were really pretty obvious: First, the remote is not very intuitive to use. Secondly, the FM reception, in a very crowded market where I'm normally able to get lots of clean reception, was dismal. And third, and most importantly, the amplifiers were very powerful, but lacked finesse. They could drive my Linn 5140s and 5120 center channel to loud volumes, but they were lifeless. The sound came across as flat and one-dimensional. All-in-all this may be an acceptable receiver when used with mass market speakers for a video set-up, but not worthwhile for music or with speakers that need some control. I sold mine after a couple of months and went back to separates. Similar Products Used: McIntosh amps, tuner and preamp Linn AV5125/5103 |
[Dec 04, 2003]
keefy6
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound. Upgradeability to SR 9200 Remote. Supports all available DVD formats except 96/24 which is available with the upgrade.
Weakness:
Remote uses alot of batteries. 2 second delay for detecting audio format/source. doesn't bother me though I bought this Reciever after about a half year of researching all or most of AV recievers. I narrowed my choices down to I belive the Denon 3800. My choice in buying this model had alot to do with the upgradeability along with the "sound" of a Marantz Amp. It is an incredible amp. Plenty of power to drive all main and surround speakers plus the sub if you don't want to go separate units. Music. Equally outstanding. I recently (two days ago) tried out the Multi-Room function for stereo music, and it actually sounded better than using the Stereo Direct for the Main speakers!! I really am glad that I bought this reciever and highly encourage all to consider if you are in the market. Similar Products Used: Kenwood Stereo Receiver |
[Oct 11, 2003]
Edward Kirchgessner
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
-Superb build quality -Great assortment of inputs -THX certified -6.1 amplification/ 7.1 ready -Great remote (similar to Pronto Neo) -Sound quality is excellent -RS232 for system upgrades and control -Elegant front panel which conceals front inputs -Great value in terms of features and quality -Good customer service experience
Weakness:
-Did have one problem requiring service -Unit is big and heavy (check your rack depth!) -Remote software is not Mac compatible -No DTS 96/24 support out-of-box -No on-screen menu for component output -No video upsampling (i.e. S to component) -DSP slow to detect inputs (fixed with upgrade!) -Pricey (but worth it) When I first began shopping for receivers a little over a year ago, I was pretty sure I'd end up with a Denon or something from the Onkyo/Integra product family. Marantz wasn't even on my list until I picked out my speakers. The local B&W dealer happened to also be a distributer for Marantz products, and offered me a $300 discount off the unit's list price (considering I was already purchasing about $3000 worth of speakers from his store). After debating between the SR7200 and the SR8200, I decided to go with the latter due to a better selection of inputs, sturdier build, and kick-ass remote control. I haven't regretted that decision for a moment. This unit's audio performance is top notch. I've heard some reviewers describe the audio characteristics of Marantz products as "warm;" though I would only use the terms "transparent," "accurate," and "fantastic." Coupled with appropriate speakers, I don't think anyone could be disappointed with this solid receiver. I've only had one problem since purchase (which did actually need to be serviced). After having the unit for about three months, a sporadic malfunction began to occur within the DSP which made it impossible for me to listen to material in straight stereo mode. Still, the service received was prompt (and totally covered by the manufacturer's warranty). I had my unit back in about ten days, and haven't had any problems since. Just as another note, Marantz has recently introduced a hardware/firmware upgrade for this unit and the SR9200. I'l be sending in my unit in the next few month's (when I feel ready to part with it) so that I can benefit from DTS 96/24, SRS 6.1, and faster digital signal detection. Similar Products Used: Sony, Onkyo, Denon, Integra, Yamaha. |
[Aug 17, 2003]
mlj4th
AudioPhile
Strength:
THE BEST DAMN SOUND QUALITY FOR THE MONEY PERIOD! On screen display while using the component output... easy to setup... average radio reception ( i dont listen to the damn radio anyway ) easy to use remote... assignable digital inputs, tons of sound fields(although i never use them)
Weakness:
DOES NOT PASS HIGH DEF THROUGH THE COMPONENT OUTPUT... IT DOWN CONVERTS IT TO 480P.... REMOTE EATS UP BATTERIES.... i luv this reciever.... it does almost everything.... though the component output does not pass 1080i hi def... that doesn't bother me because i plug directly into my hi def rear projection tv... remote is great and easy to use although it goes it burns batteries like a wild fire... i went from using separates to using this reciever... sounds like a step backwards doesn't it....NOT! i use the marantz to fire my center and rear speakers.... i still use my my rotel 5 channel amp to by amp my front NHT VT2's... i'm dissapointed the the marantz doesn't have bass management but so far it hasn't affected my sound quality.... my equipment is as followed.... Marantz sr8200, hughes High Definition satelite reviever, mitubishi ws55807 rear projection hi def ready tv, denon dvd2900 universal dvd player, xbox, phillips cd recorder, rotel rb985thx 5 channel amp, nht vt2 fronts, nht vs2 center, b&w surrounds, M&K mx350thx powered subwoofer,over 600dvd's, over 2500 cd's, 1 dvd audio, and 1 sacd.... Similar Products Used: SONY TAE9000ES |
[Aug 13, 2003]
chris
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
6 seperate amps,easy to use remote,easy to read manual unlike the denon.
Weakness:
none so far awesum reciever,i bought a denon 3803 b4 this one ,i listened to the marantz the day after i purchased the 82oo took the denon back the next day the sound was an incredible differance i thought i also purchased new speakers it was that much of a differancei am running 4 psb 500i's with a psb 8c center and a newton p1000 sub.easy to use, easy set up crisp clean sound,amust buy if you are in the market for a a/v reciever Similar Products Used: denon 3803 |
[Jul 25, 2003]
2cflyr
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
programmable inputs, remote, amplifier section, user-friendliness (and on....)
Weakness:
none that I can find. I have had my 8200 for over a year and could not be happier. I went with Marantz instad of Denon just for the amp section and was pleasnatly surprised at how easy it is to use. If you have the money for it, you will not be unhappy with your purchase. Similar Products Used: Denon, Sony's ES recievers, B&K |
[Jul 24, 2003]
Matt
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
power, remote, and ease of use.
Weakness:
size 120 watts of pure, clean power that makes listening to any variety of music a pleasure. The powered multi-room allows an additional room to play a completely different source. This really impressed my wife! The SR8200 has a lovely performance with my Energy Speaker surround system. I definitely got my money worth and I'll never look back. Similar Products Used: Denon 3803, Onkyo, Yamaha 3300, Sony ES line. |
[Apr 17, 2003]
Hans Hiemstra
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
DD-EX and DTS-ES for 6.1 sound. Circle Surround 5.1 used on regular stereo CD's sound almost as good as 5.1 DVD music video's
Weakness:
Only 6.1 in stead of 7.1 and remote control does not learn complete functions for my JVC VCR and TV Great receiver, taht combines good with my 15 year old MB quart frontspeaker and Mordaunt-Short sattalites, center and subwoofer. Nice remote control. |