NAD 716AV A/V Receivers
NAD 716AV A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 06, 2016]
jarunam
Audio Enthusiast
i just purchased a NAD 716 and Maudent short ms 10 for my room. I was taken aback by the sheer size of the NAD was very skeptical until i fixed it up using professional 16 gauge wire and bought a super TERK FM indoor Arial and fixed it up.
|
[Nov 27, 2012]
Marco
AudioPhile
AV 716
|
[Mar 01, 2012]
Hifidelity Hobby
Audio Enthusiast
From Malaysia
|
[Feb 25, 2011]
Harshan
Audio Enthusiast
It's a good product and outstanding perfromance |
[May 29, 2007]
John Stoddart
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great specs. Nice features.
Weakness:
Terrible performance. See one of the reviews of the NAD C352 for a similar experience.
NAD will list their favourable reviews ad nauseum, and there is no doubt their products sport excellent tech specs. The AV 716 is no exception. Decent power, useful features - I particularly like the ability to play different inputs over main and remote speakers. BUT, and this is a huge but, use them over a number of years and you're in for disappointment. I own three NAD products including this one, and all exhibit similar characteristics. In a nutshell, how do they do it, you ask, such great specs for so little (relatively) money? I suspect they cut corners on components. My AV 716 has become virtually unusable over the years because speakers cut out, or fizz, continuously. Two attempts to get help from NAD's electronic support team resulted in (after lengthy delays, maybe they were all on vacation) one virtual non-response and, finally, an explanation that my "relays are carboned-up". Last time I had this kind of problem was more than thirty years ago with my first amp, a very cheap product in the early days of stereo. I'm not about to lay out the cost of a new amp to get this one serviced, so I have to write it off to experience. But I'll say this: I've owned all kinds of hi-fi equipment over the years, including several products rated at, or near, the top in their class (e.g. Quad Electrostatic speakers). My NAD products are by far the worst I have purchased. Never again. Customer Service Just about non-existent. Weeks go by without any response and when it finally arrives it's either a guess or completely unhelpful. Similar Products Used: Quad amps and pre-amps. |
[Mar 21, 2000]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great Sound In BOTH Stereo and Dolby Pro Logic. Build Quality.
Weakness:
No Pre outs. Lack of upgradability. Clip speaker connections for rear and center channell. I'm just about to upgrade to DD but its been hard to find a reciever that offers no frills great sound in both the video and music domain. I've been spoiled by my NAD 716. |
[Sep 09, 2001]
Erik
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very clean power and nice tight bass great looks easy to use and lots of opps on it.
Weakness:
NONE Just to say this is the best A/V I have had i love it more then my nad pre amp and amp .the sound is great! Similar Products Used: Adcom and rotel |
[Feb 25, 1998]
Sunny Pang
a Casual Listener
I just brought it two months ago as a special price offer at one of the largestHi-Fi shop in Hong Kong, undoubly speaking it is a very friendly machine with |
[Jun 08, 1998]
Travis Welch
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had my NAD AV716 for about a year. It is a good receiver, but I have to complain because I also have a harman/kardon AVR-10 that I spent hundreds less on but the NAD only has slightly better sound (??). Also, my biggest complaint is the lack of ability to be upgraded to 5.1. Also, my remote just gave out the other day, now comon' NAD, you can do better than that! But I am looking forward to their new receiver incorporating AC-3 coming out at the end of the summer. |
[Jul 10, 1998]
Darron Giron
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the 716 for two years now, and I have been pleased with the purchase. I listen about 50/50 HT/Stereo. It is very simple to operate, has more than enough power in both modes, and sounds very clean. The one thing I am a little disapointed in is the fact that there are no pre-out/main-in jacks for the five channels. Not that I want or need an external amp or processor, just that it would be nice to have the option. I have an older pair of Polk Monitor 7C's as main fronts with the Polk CS275 and M3II's as surround speakers. I don't consider myself an audiophile or expert by any means, but the system sounds very good to me, and when I have listened to others I did not think they sounded any better. I got it for $500 at Sound City though the mail. At that price, I think it was an excellent buy. |