NAD T753 A/V Receivers
NAD T753 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 13, 2013]
Vlad
AudioPhile
NAD T 753 receiver:
|
[Apr 30, 2012]
Adrian
AudioPhile
I LOVE MY T753 NAD. I remember when i first got my unit in 2006. I previously had a Yamaha and i sold it, i wanted something more seriously and it took me a long, long time to discover a NAD unit until one day i went into a audio store, they had this unit and i fell in love with it. The interesting thing about my story is that my unit had the humming sound when i had the volume to 0db. Took it back to the shop right away so i didn't get a chance to play with it. They sent out for repair(took about two weeks) mean while they lend me a Pioneer Elite, took it home and didn't like it at all, it had no life. Took home a Denon and the sound was too damm dull. My Yamaha i realized that it was LOUD, yet irritating to my ears after a while of listening to music, it was perfect for home theater, but with the NAD i discovered that there was a HUGE difference between loudness and quality sound. After listening to all these units and experiencing with each of them, when i got my NAD back, i was blown away by the high quality sound difference, dynamic, open, crystal clear warm sound. What blows me away is that i got my receiver for $750 out the door back then! For that price, i could not be any happier. My unit is still up and running, and rocking strong. I would never buy anything else than NAD. Sometimes you will go thru repairs but it is worth it. There are very few receivers that come CLOSE to NAD, and the ones that do they cost a TON! Sound wise alone, this T753, from what i have played at Best Buy's Magnolia Home Theater, it still blows them away a lot of those really expensive shiny looking yamaha and denon receivers. The T753 is only rated at 70 Watts per channel. I can imagine what a 100 Watt NAD sounds like. Amazing! |
[Feb 16, 2010]
Justin
AudioPhile
This review is for the NAD T754. I have a 751 and a 752 also as well as a Marantz SR7002. The t754 sounds better than them all. I bought it to replace a quirky T752. The TT754 sounded harsh when I first connected it(like an Onyko). After leaving it on overnight it took on the typical NAD sound(punchy and laid back). I never had a receiver experience break in but this one did. No fan noise. In a world with HDMI(HDCP) it might not make sense to go with an older unit like this. However , I run all video directly to the monitor so I can adjust the picture for individual inputs( Instead of a happy medium for all sources when using the receiver for a switcher). If audio matters most Nad generally offers the most bang for the buck. |
[Aug 12, 2008]
Terran
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound, 5.1 input/output, good remote control.
Weakness:
Fan noise. I purchased this NAD T-753 to replace my dolby Digital Ready Carver receiver. The first thing I notice is the heavy weight of the NAD T-753. The NAD just simply blows away my old Carver receiver. The Carver is good but the NAD sounds much fuller and more punchy. The NAD has very good stereo image and it is a powerful machine. Next, I compare this NAD with my Arcam integrated amp Delta 290. It takes me a few days to decide the Arcam is slightly better. The Arcam sound is crystal clear while the NAD has a nice warm sound. Although the Arcam sounds better, I still like the NAD warm sound. This NAD T-753 is a amazing because it can challenge a good Arcam integrated amp at the same price.
Similar Products Used: Carver, Arcam, Adcom, Harman Kardon. |
[Sep 13, 2006]
Steve Monska
AudioPhile
Strength:
2 ch. sound unequalled for sub $1k HT receivers
Weakness:
My last 2 NAD HT receivers both were quirky, but this one isn't.
I bought this unit as a refurb for $649 but it looks brand new to me, I can't find any evidence of previous use. This unit replaced a NAD T751, which replaced a failed NAD T760. I also have a custom KT88 tube amp for my front mains, with PSB image speakers.
Similar Products Used: Cambridge audio 540R, yamaha HTR-5250, older onkyo, NAD T751 & T760 |
[Sep 13, 2006]
Steve Monska
AudioPhile
Strength:
2 ch. sound unequalled for sub $1k HT receivers
Weakness:
My last 2 NAD HT receivers both were quirky, but this one isn't.
I bought this unit as a refurb for $649 but it looks brand new to me, I can't find any evidence of previous use. This unit replaced a NAD T751, which replaced a failed NAD T760. I also have a custom KT88 tube amp for my front mains, with PSB image speakers.
Similar Products Used: Cambridge audio 540R, yamaha HTR-5250, older onkyo, NAD T751 & T760 |
[Feb 19, 2005]
aharri1
AudioPhile
Strength:
Very powerful for 70x6 watts per channel. Channel separation and stereo bypass drive are clean and rigid. Very nice array of video inputs with monitor switching.
Weakness:
Locks up sometimes and needs to be reset. Not much to complain about all around. 2 Component Video In Mon out. 6 Assignable Digital Inputs 4 Coax, 2 Optical. Very superb sound. Clean and powerful. I reccomend this to anyone in the 800 to 1200 dollar price range of receivers. |