Nakamichi AV-2s A/V Receivers

Nakamichi AV-2s A/V Receivers 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-7 of 7  
[Sep 08, 2013]
Gibson
AudioPhile

i just want to said that i do'nt used this Nakamichi in HT but in 2 ch and i was disappointed.

I do'nt know if the Nakamichi 2 is better than the 2s but if you want dedicate 2 ch pass
this model 2s.In my system he do'nt stay more than 2 week now in storage for sales...

You will need to use the loudness to have decent bass??? So for me a good power amp
do'nt need loudness. I buy it because i wanted to upgrade. But my Technics SU-V60 was
better and still better. Now i have separe power/pream with much better sound. Also i got
a chance to buy a used Furutech FS Alpha 1 DIY speaker cable for $100 buck, Wow
amazing value for the money. If you like dance and rock music or owned a discotheque get Furutech Alpha 1. You will keep them for life....

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
3
[Nov 28, 2003]
Valentin Kryukov
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Outstanding sound quality Absence of poppy unnecessary features Price/Quality ratio

Weakness:

No RDS Non-programmable remote control No PHONO input NO 5.1 input (but for such price it is OK)

Of course it is obsolete in terms of current standards, but my goal was to buy a good stereo receiver at a reasonable price (after reading loads of reviews that Nak in stereo mode outdoes many much more expensive models by other brands I decided to give this very unit a try). And it seems it's true. Sound quality is incredible. It completely beats my previous unit (AKAI AA-39). Well, I know that AKAI receivers were rather bad, so I have to say that it also sounds much better than different Pioneer, Technics and Marantz units owned by my friends. And once more, even with my old AKAI CD-49 CD player and Bose AM 3 speakers sound quality became AMAZING while with the old receiver it was quite average. I agree with all good words already said by other people, thanks for advising me. About fan noise - I disagree that it's irritating. I'm a fan, in particular, of classical guitar music (rather quiet genre) and I don't hear the fan when I'm further than 1 m from the unit.

Similar Products Used:

AKAI, Pioneer, Technics, Marantz

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 24, 2003]
Larry
Casual Listener

Strength:

True Ear-Candy Sound. Nice-Remote. Mega-Bass feature. Black with Orange LED's looks cool. Big Fat Buttons.

Weakness:

The FM scan mode has trouble locking Weak signals. To change the Pre-Set FM stations, you have to press the Next Key twice and it only goes forward, should have a next-previous feature.

having no background on nak performance, I got a great deal on this receiver. For about 500, it compares to the power of my 1100.00 luxman, and beats the sound of it. I setup 5 channel Mini-Infinity hanging bookshelf speakers with an old dbx sub-woofeer in my basement, and let me tell you, I have NEVER heard stereo-sound with such seperation and clarity as this... I have sinced moved the setup to my master bedroom, where I sometimes sit and change radio stations for hours... Whether its jazz, classical, rock or whatever, the depth, precision and sharpness of every instrument SIMPLY POPS right out of the speakers... I am amazed. If you havent heard sound like this, you are missing out. Demo and Buy one.

Similar Products Used:

Luxman, Philips, Teac.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 26, 2003]
Chris
AudioPhile

Strength:

Unusually musical for stereo use. Nice, clean design. Decent power overall.

Weakness:

Noisy as hell with fan running. This is fine for movies but if you are listening to a Chopin CD it's way too noisy. Flimsy speaker selection buttons. Red + white insulation pieces on at least 3 rear RCA jacks broke off. I am very gentle with my gear so this was really weird to me.

I wanted a simple, uncomplicated A/V receiver for my secondary (video) system. The Nak would have to do duty as an amplifier AND processor. I've always liked the Nak line and, for the price paid, the AV2s is a good value. Simple, relatively uncomplicated design which is good for a no-nonsense entry-level home theater setup. The build quality is not as good as previous Nak components (see below)

Similar Products Used:

Nak BX-300 tape deck Panasonic LaserDisc Panasonic DVD Paradigm Phantom v. 2 speakers Synergistic cable.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jan 26, 2002]
Salim SM
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

sound quality

Weakness:

no preamp out, service


being a nak-fan, i'm biased toward nak decks ... but not on its receivers ! my first experience with re-1 was not so good (but sr4 & 3 receivers are so much more better). on a/v stuff i was a victim of most audio magazines' hype on yamaha. frankly speaking yamaha did sound better than sherwood on pro logic, but music was so lifeless. even my bright b&w speakers sound dull.

i decided to give nak av a try after reading audioreview, and what a difference this receiver made !! music suddenly came alive, just like in 'normal' stereo. punch, clarity, everything is back there again. if you listen to music at all, compare this nak with any yamaha, onkyo, sony, denon avrs before you make the purchase. too bad nak shoot itself by providing lousy service. best bet is to buy used - 'proven burn in period' - and get a hell of a deal compared to other avrs at 3-4 times the price. movie fans who are into dts and dd need to check av10 out (i will).

system: denon dvd 3000, b&w p6 & cc6 (later replaced with kef 104 & paradigm cc300)

Similar Products Used:

avr: sherwood, yamaha 690, 890. audio: nak receivers, b&k, rotel, adcom, bryston, nak stasis amps.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 26, 1998]
Kenneth
an Audio Enthusiast

Just bought an AV-2s, first some background:
I've been contemplating an upgrade of my old faithful Yamaha int. amp for over a year now. So far I hadn't considered Nakamichi as output for my system, and not being keen on an A/V setup I actually intended to audition audio integrated amps such as NAD, Harman Kardon or Rotel. A local store is recently offering an excellent deal on the AV-2s so I decided to drop in for a listen. And was I surprised!! The general tonal clarity and smoothness, faithful reproduction across the spectrum amazed my ears. The AV-2s definitely competes nicely with 'boutique' amps, and it is probably superior than any other "Japanese" amp for $1000. Best part is, I paid just half that !

Conclusion: Nakamichi AV-2s is a totally musical and transparent component that, even for regular retail of Cdn$900, is perhaps the best in its class. Even without Digital Dolby, it is a versatile and user-friendly A/V ProLogic receiver that sounds as good as an integrated amp that costs hundreds more.

Ken in Vancouver
Nakamichi AV-2s
Denon DCD1420
Denon TU767
Yamaha KX500
Energy Pro 22 Monitor

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Dec 27, 1999]
Wayne
Audiophile

Strength:

Sound Quality

Weakness:

Surround Sound - not necessary for me.

I cannot believe the sound quality from this reciever. Nakamichi should be congratulated for for producing a reciever of this quality for a price of less than $1000.
I recently purchased it for $299 cdn. at the local Costco - WOW score. This unit will now be used for stereo front only, I don't use surround much. After listening to and studying music for 35 yrs I feel I should support a company like Nakamichi. If you can get your hands on a AV2 take it home and listen - amazing.

Similar Products Used:

Bryston 3b with Adcom and SAE preamps.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-7 of 7  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com