Nakamichi AV-500 A/V Receivers
Nakamichi AV-500 A/V Receivers
[May 05, 1999]
Mike Edson
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought this receiver a few months ago after reading all the promising reviews at this site. I found one at the local Best Buy store for $300. After using it for the past 4 months, I have to admit that it is probably the best $300 I've ever spent on an audio equipment. Before I bought it I shopped around for weeks on end, looking at Yamaha RX-V992, Denon AVR-2400, Onkyo, Pioneer, etc. When I first saw the NAK at Best Buy, I hated the ugly appearance--I thought it looked like a piece of junk. But when I listened to it and compared it with the other receivers, it blew me away. The sound is so rich, even at low volumes. Yes, this is not top-end audiophile equipment but it is pretty damn good, and for the price, it is an incredible bargain. The only drawbacks are the fan noise and the lack of Phono input which has rendered my LP collection useless. |
[Sep 12, 1998]
Roger Wiseman
an Audio Enthusiast
First a little background is necessary- Nakamichi currently produces three receivers, the AV1-s, AV2-s and AV3-s. These receivers are sold (with modified face plates) as the AV-500, AV-400 and AV-300, respectively by Best Buy discount stores. I have compared the spec sheets and the Best Buy models are indentical in specifications and features down to the last ounce of weight to the regular NAK models. All are pro-logic only, but the AV-1s and AV-500 are dolby digital ready. The prices at Best Buy make these the hottest bargain in the pro-logic receiver market. I actually bought both the AV-300 at $199.95 and the AV-500 at $379.95 (on sale for one week - regular price now is $399.95. Originally, they went for $279.95 and $449.95. Be sure and check these out before they are gone. |
[Jan 16, 2001]
Mike Costoff
Casual Listener
Strength:
Power, Reliability
Weakness:
Lack of built-in digital decoder I don't think this model is available (new) any longer. I've had mine for just over a year now and I've never had any problems with it. I have a Polk CS400 center channel, RT800 fronts, Klipsch quintets for rears, and a Polk subwoofer. I'm also running two Bose 251 outdoor speakers off the "B" switch that are mounted outside on my deck. I play the thing an average of at least four hours a day and I have no complaints other than....now I'm looking at DVD players and I wish it had a built in decoder rather than just the 5.1 channel input. I'll say one thing - for the price, I'm sure not complaining. Similar Products Used: Denon, NAD |
[Oct 01, 1999]
Mike
an Audiophile
I bought the AV-500 over a year ago. I was a stupid college kid who was just getting into home audio. Not that I'm that much older or wiser, but my opinion of the AV-500 has changed. When I first got it, I was use to tv speakers. I was blown away by how much better sounding movies were. Recently, I noticed the sound stage is not that "dynamic". I don't know how to explain it but there is definately something missing in sound quality. I'm currently trying to unload the AV500 and get separates. The rest of my system is decent I have NHT superzeros at the corners, a NHT Supercenter in the middle, an ACI Titan sub up front, and a ACI Quake sub in the back. When I bought the speakers I put a lot of time into research, and I'm truly happy with the way they perform. But I bought the AV-500 on a whim, and regret it. I've hooked up separates to my speakers noticed a vast improvement. By the way I have a Toshiba DVD with decoder that sounds great when run through the AV-500, so maybe it's just the preamp part of the receiver that sucks. So, my advice anyone serious about home audio is to buy something else. But to those who just want something better that tv speakers and can a good deal on an AV-500, go ahead and buy it. |
[Oct 21, 1999]
Steven
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Hi power at 120 watts left and right, true high current amp, low price (around $200-$250)
Weakness:
Low power at rears 60 watts left and right, no S-Video Inputs or Outputs, no Optical Inputs or Outputs, product has been discontinued by Nakamichi I bought this receiver primarily to listen to music. As of this writing, many receivers in the same price range ($250-$300) can be bought with S-Video inputs, Optical inputs, and have built in digital decoders! I bought this receiver without listening to it. I relied pretty heavily on the reviews that have been written on this board trusting my instincts that many knew what they were talking about. I'm using this receiver with a pair of Acoustic Research 216's. They sound great. I have not experienced any of the complaints that people below have expressed. One is the fan noise. It's very low. One guy down below said that he could hear it when listening to his music at low levels. I was listening to this receiver exactly two feet away with the music at moderately low volume (around 8 o'clock). I couldn't hear anything. If you are worried about this, don't. Unless you listen to music with the Receiver exactly 1 foot away from your head, and have the volume turned at 7 o'clock (almost off), the fan noise is nothing to worry about. Another complaint is the looks. It's hard to find a picture on the internet of this model. I am contemplating putting one up to prove the naysayers wrong because this is another ludicrous complaint. The face of the receiver looks like an average receiver. It is concave as one reviewer below expressed, but only slightly, and it is done in a way that is very subtle as the black face plate blends in with the black concave display window. Any complaints about the sound quality I would guess are the result of either improper setup, or perhaps something being wrong with the receiver itself. Similar Products Used: Nikko Receiver |
[Mar 05, 1999]
steve
an Audio Enthusiast
I see this unit compared to Sony's recievers, well guess what, pull the cover and you'll see that it is a Sony! Its uglier than a Sony, sounds the same as a sony and doesnt deserve the Nakamichi name. Might as well save a few bucks and get a Sony, or spend a few more dollars and get a decent HK, Onkyo, Denon or Yamaha, all of wich sound better are built better and generally have a better warranty. They deserve negative 10 stars for trying to trick us into buying more Sony crap!! |
[Feb 10, 1999]
Geoffrey
a Casual Listener
The AV500 is a wonderful bargain. It's high-grade underpinnings become apparent when you try to lift this bad boy. I replaced my Onkyo TXV940 with the Nak, and could immediately tell a difference. The bass was effortless and the highs weren't pinched sounding like on the Onkyo. That was on my DCM Timeframe600s, which I replaced with the Boston Acoustics Micro Reference System9000. This is an excellent set of 5.1 speakers, by the way. The sound is brilliant and the construction is rock solid(or aluminum I should say). |
[Aug 29, 2001]
Raub Quimby
Strength:
power , clear sound all around
Weakness:
remote! I cant find a remote to work this thing . ( home theater ) the best I've owed yet! Similar Products Used: sonys, tech, nads, kenwood, pioneers ..... the list goes on and on ! |
[Apr 15, 1999]
jeff
a Casual Listener
can anyone tell me where i can get this model through mail order. i have been looking everywhere. please help, thanks |
[Apr 03, 1999]
michelle
an Audio Enthusiast
I just bought the AV-500 at (surprise!) Best Buy last night for, get this...$169.60!!!!!!! I haddn't planned on buying, was really still shopping around, but I figured I could always return it. When I saw that price on a Nak, I knew something didn't add up, esp. when I saw "made in Malaysia". But it was so hefty, and sooo cheap compared to other pro-logics (not interested in digital yet) I couldn't resist for the price. |