Nakamichi AV-7 A/V Receivers
Nakamichi AV-7 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 29, 1999]
BendenaJones
an Audio Enthusiast
Received the Nak av7 today from ubid for $227, where there seems to be a deluge of these receivers for sale. I wanted a receiver/amp that could deliver clean solid power through all frequencies with good imaging. The Nak doesn't disappoint. I was replacing a low end Kenwood kvr-45, rated 55w RMS, but like most mass-market low-end receivers, the kenwood lacked what the specs promised eventthough on a direct match up, on paper, the kenwood was supposedly better, mostly in the THD catagory for the various aspects. This just goes to prove something I've known for some time: statistics and specs can and are manipulated in any manner which benefits the product. NOTHING, especially with audio and video products, beats reputation and personal experience. My 12 yr old Energy ESM-3s never sounded better than with the Nak which pointed out that the Nak was clearly in a different class of audio components than most. I was dead set on a Onkyo ds575, but the cheapest I could find it for was $370. The Onkyo would have had more frills and thrills, but like those below, that's not why most people buy audio equipment - to listen to, not look at. The Naks controls are simple and staight forward to operate. The display is basic, but informative, even from a distance once you learn the locations of the indicators. The remote is big, and it would have been nice to be backlite and smaller, with multi-device control. No fan noise problem. I had to put my ear next to the fan to hear it, and even then I heard the air noise and not the fan.I can't wait to try it out on my new - yet to arrive Infinity rs-5s and in dolby surround. |
[Sep 29, 1999]
an Audio Enthusiast
I also bought this from U-Bid. Don't know why NAK is selling these models so cheaply, but I jumped on this one the minute I saw it for under 300 bucks. Great sound. Clear, powerful, and nice-looking. Weighs quite a bit, too, and it is easy to see why this thing retails for 799 (built very solidly and delivers great sound). Highly recommended. (Have not set it up with my dvd player which has a DD decoder built in)...hope to soon. |
[Sep 20, 1999]
Ryan Davidson
an Audiophile
Forget about the uninspired, mediocre stuff NAK came out with before the launch of their new stuff. This NAK has some serious sound as does the AV8 and AV10! I just got my AV7 today and couldn't be more happy with this $260 purchase (Ubid). The sound is GREAT, and I'm saying this from a Denon fan point-of-view. It is powerful, not bright or fatigueing (hooked up to NHT Super 2s and the BIG NHT dipole surrounds even!), the bass is plentiful and punchy. I really can't pin-point any real weaknesses of the sound on DVD movies. I haven't listened to music on it yet because it's not a priority for this system, but I am very confident with it's capabilities (not even close to being broken in). I have KEF RDM 2s, a Musical Fidelity A2, and an MSB Link Dac in my music system- I don't expect the Nak to compete with this set-up as far as acoustic/jazz/classical/ and any vocal music goes. However, I do also like to listen to heavy rock and techno at times and the Nak should work just fine for those days. If you're in the market for a new receiver and you're looking for something nice other than Denons or Yamahas, give the NAKs a try! I guarantee you'll be pleasantly surprised. |
[Oct 25, 1999]
Michael
Casual Listener
Strength:
crisp highs and midrange
Weakness:
bass response Wonderful reproduction of both music and movies. detailed and powerful. Bass seems to be sorely lacking, could this be because it is so new? Is there a good breakin timeframe? Any suggestions would help. Similar Products Used: denon 3300, sherwood-newcastle 945mkII |
[Jan 30, 2000]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Warm, clean sound.
Weakness:
Lack of phono input, Bought from UBID for $287 after seeing the favorable reviews here. In general I'm pleased. Although it cost a lot less than the Sony it replaced, it's much less tiring to listen to. I think it's a fuller, richer and deeper sound. |
[Oct 27, 1999]
Armand
Audio Enthusiast
This receiver is simply awesome. Probably you won't believe me since this is only a dolby prologic model (has a 5.1 channel inputs at the back) and NOT a dolby digital model. If this is the case, you should go for an audition. I had my first receiver from JVC, RX-201 model. Several months ago I upgraded to Harman Kardon AVR 20MKII. The H/K product was good, but then I decided to return it (it's been only 20 days at my place) and bought the AV-7 from UBid. I did not expect much from this receiver since, it's only a dolby prologic model. However, when it arrived at my place, WOW!!!! It was sooooo good to hear the sound. |
[Dec 10, 1999]
Daniel Chang
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great value, decent amplifier
Weakness:
Reliability, build, and customer service - I agree with a lot of the reviews posted below. The receiver sounded great and at the price ($225 from Ubid) I would be hard pressed to find a better bargain. However, a word of advice, if you buy this receiver, buy it from a local store or pray that it doesn't break, b/c Nakamichi customer service is... non-existent. Similar Products Used: Harman Kardon receivers |
[Dec 04, 1999]
Danny
Audiophile
Strength:
Great Sound and Output.....Just Excellent!
Weakness:
Made in Maylasia. No DTS Decoder. Well, after about a month of so of use and break in....the Nakamichi AV 7 sounds outstanding with crisp highs, warm mids, and solid / tight output of bass. Connected to my AV 7 is the Nakamichi DVD10, Nakamichi MB10. The speaker of choice are the Wharfedales Modus One.Six, Sapphire 83s for the rear, Modus Music Center for the center and the Velodyne CT100 for the sub. I am quite pleased with the AV 7 purchase...especially for the $$ I paid for. Since the AV 7 is not a DTS unit, it is however AC-3 ready. My DVD has the DTS decoder so that eliminates the need for a decoder or a receiver that has one. So, I am going to rate the AV 7 based on the break in period as well as the output it has given already. A solid rating for a solid piece of equipment. |
[Apr 25, 2000]
Ed Francisco
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Warm, pristine, crystal-clear sound. Great value receiver.
Weakness:
Mediocre radio tuner - but at this day and age, who listens to the radio anymore? This receiver is one of the best if not the best of all amps within this price range. You simply cannot get a better sounding receiver for under $500. I initially bought it for music listening and paired it up with the ff: |