Nakamichi AV-8 A/V Receivers
Nakamichi AV-8 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 09, 2005]
AbrahamDrinkin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Relatively clean sound, multiple digital inputs.
Weakness:
Product support, good luck getting any information from Nakamichi. Naks are notoriously tempermental. No 5.1. No subwoofer test. No apparent compatibility with single channel powered subwoofers. I bought this with the knowledge that it did not power on. Two weeks and $100 later the crack in the board was fixed. Unfortunately, using Radio Shack gold cables is not a great idea with the Nak, as the tension of the connectors have pulled out several of the RCA plugs. Sound quality is good for the retail price and appears to be only limited to the efficiency of the speakers. This Nak has many good features, as should be expected. The learning remote is a plus, but could be improved. Similar Products Used: Kenwood |
[Nov 05, 2003]
aaron
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Warm sound Powerful bass
Weakness:
Reliability! I bought this amp a few years back. It has performed well, up til this past week. For some reason, the audio output cuts out if the volume is turned past ~5%. This happens with CD's and Movies alike. I have written Nakamichi about bringing it in to a local repair shop, but they have not responded. This incident along with the failure of a Nakamichi car audio amplifier has shaken my opinion of Nakamichi's reliability. Their repair service (even under warranty) takes months...I'm afraid to even ask them about sending it in (at my cost.) I will be very reluctant to purchase another Nakamichi product ever again. |
[Aug 22, 2002]
Julian Larke
Casual Listener
Strength:
Sounds sublime. Looks like it could entertain and survive a small war. All the right features for me. The right price.
Weakness:
The remote is a joke which is a shame, because the right functions are there, you just cant be bothered find them. I had decided to get a cheap Sony AV amp to replace the old NAD I had sitting under the TV. I saw this on an end of line offer at £200 and I knew i just had to have it. It is built like a tank, looks ugly but honest and has a remote that takes all the worst elements of 80s design and jumbles them up a bit. But, being teenager of the 70s the word Nakamichi had me mesmerised. Nakamichi was the aspirational brand of my youth. The shops never put a price on Nakamichi because if you needed to ask you couldn't afford it. 5 minutes later I was driving home with a smile as wide as the Tyne on my face. And a very heavy weight in the boot. And do you know what? I haven't stopped smiling. In stereo, through my Kef Q15.2s it is simply the dogs bollocks, detailed and articulate without ever being tiring. The radio receiver is worth £200 in its own right live broadcasts really do put you in the concert hall. And Dolby Digital (through 2 more Kef Q15.2s and a Q95C), well I’m no expert but it can certainly scare my kids even with the pictures switched off. This is just a great piece of kit for a family man like me. Cheap enough to keep within our budget and genuinely awesome value when it does what it does. The real shame of course is that Richer Sounds probably had 10 for the whole country, and 10 lucky souls like me wandered off with them months ago. The website says they are awaiting stock but it’s been like that for weeks. I can't see them getting any returns either. Similar Products Used: Pioneer SX 590, circa 1975 and still going strong in my son's room. |
[Jun 08, 2002]
paul_trumpet
AudioPhile
Strength:
In stereo with SACD, unbelieveable sound quality. Radio better than a Sony tuner worth as much as the receiver ! Learning remote. Real speaker binding posts (some won't take 4mm plugs). Turn it up - instant home disco ! Amazing volume possible. Red display blends well with any other black hi-fi.... see one and understand... Warms up sounds, makes folk music listenable. Makes big band, jazz, classicla, rock, pop, metal, funk etc sound marvellous. Wife massively pleased with item.
Weakness:
I've had to cut a hole in the back of the cabinet to get it on the shelf... The cooling fan can be heard if you're close and it's late at night. Rear power rating says 950W 230VAC, I haven't noticed an increased electricity bill yet. I read some guy had reliability problems and bought a 3 year guarantee. If that fan stops spinning...... In hi-fi terms, treble end is a little soft. I was only looking for a quality 2 channel stereo amp and noticed this av reciever was on offer for a very good price, under £200 or $300 USD. Firstly, you open the box and find the machine is very heavy and well built. The manual is about half an inch thick... Then you notice that it does not have a multi channel analogue input for SACD or Dolby DTS built in. So thats why its cheap. Then I wired it up and just about got through my entire collection of CDs as the sound is warm, detailed and untiring to listen to, even noticing some details I'd missed before. Even my wifes folk music CDs sounded good ! The receivers tuner sounds better than our Sony STB-920S unit (up for sale) which was completely unexpected. The digital input is quieter than the analogue one and not so good at portraying depth or layers but has cleaner treble. You can pick.... I have not tried it for Home Cinema uses yet, I am still shocked by the stereo performance on 2 channel SACD playback, the excellent free built in radio, free D-A converter and unbelievable volume I can have through my Dynaudio Audience 60 floorstander speakers. Oh, the remote can learn the codes from your other remotes as well.... and the amp has an auxiliary switched mains socket which my CD is attached to that goes on/off with standby on the amp. Similar Products Used: Had a quick play with Denon, Sony, Yamaha, Marantz.... they were more money and sounded far worse in stereo. |
[Feb 16, 2000]
Craig
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
simple, elegant design; easy to use; sounds great; plenty of power
Weakness:
DAC is not 24 bit/96 kHz (most digital components downconvert to 48 kHz anyway);lack of soundfield modes and similar gimicky features for those who like to play with such things I've had this receiver for about 5 months now and am very, very pleased with it. Nakamichi has taken a simplicity in design approach to this line of receivers, and I think it paid off. For the money, you get more power and fewer gimicks than in other receivers at similar price points. The features that are important, such as onboard DD decoder, multiple digital inputs (there are 2), automatic power-on, tone control override, dual main speaker outputs, and automatic detection of the signal type (PCM, Pro-logic, DD) are all present. There are only 3 soundfields to choose from if you like to play with features like this, but I hardly ever touch them. The AV-8 is easy to set up and very simple to use, and I think it looks very nice as well. Nakamichi really thought about useability and usefulness of different features when they designed this one. Similar Products Used: I auditioned similarly priced NAD, Yamaha, Denon, Marantz, Onkyo, Sony receivers. The Yamaha that lived in my apartment for a year was significantly more difficult to use. |
[Jan 20, 2001]
Floyd Anderson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Not loaded with useless features. Clean sound.
Weakness:
Remote is barely functional. I was out of town when the AV8 arrived. At 1:00 AM when I returned I had to open the box and take a look. The remote was the first item I saw and I was both tired and now dissappointed - this remote is basically the same as with the Nakamichi AVR500 (this is why the remote after market is so good, eh). Similar Products Used: Nakamichi AVR500, B&K. |
[Dec 19, 2000]
Dov Pinker
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Beauty in simplicity
Weakness:
No DTS, flimsy speaker inputs I just hooked her up last night and I wanted to warn folks that you have to make sure the voltage is properly set to 110v for N. America. I got my unit from Ubid and the voltage was set to 220! Similar Products Used: Marantz SR 7000, Onkyo 575x, Yamaha, Pioneer |
[Aug 09, 2001]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crisp sound, great for music or movies. Classic simple design... Solid build.
Weakness:
I miss the sleep feature my old Sony had. Love how Nak focused on sound quality for this unit... Imagine that in a receiver : ). They left out a lot of the bells and whistles you can get with other home theatre receivers but... To tell ya the truth I don't miss them (other than the sleep feature). The sound quality would be very hard to match in this price range! Similar Products Used: HK, Sony, Denon, NAD |
[May 03, 2001]
Jim
Strength:
Price-to-performance, quality of construction, sensible features
Weakness:
Not many: Remote (so what!), no DTS (so what!) I have never owned any Nakamichi components since I became a "budget" high-end audiophile back in 1982, but judging from what I have experienced with this component I'd have to say I'm very impressed with NAK quality and the performance of this receiver! Similar Products Used: Tested against Marantz SR-5000, Denon AVR-2801 |
[Nov 17, 2000]
Edward
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
does everything well
Weakness:
sometimes lacks low end This is a good a/v receiver. If you are looking for clean warm sound in a A/V receiver look no more. Yes, it doesn't have all of the frills like other japanese crap because everthing is spent on the amp and equipment that matters. My Denon AVR-2800 has 10X more toys but it doesnt sound close to the Nak in sound. If gimicks are your forte, stay away. This receiver makes the Klipschs sing. New things I have never heard before with this thing. Similar Products Used: denon 2800 |