Pioneer VSX-14 A/V Receivers
Pioneer VSX-14 A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 01, 2009]
John
Casual Listener
I bought my receiver used on E-Bay. It came with a remote but it was for a different receiver. I bought a owners guide online and tried to set up the unit for my HT room. With out the proper remote, it is hard to adjust all of the features especially the subwoffer. I am unable to adjust most of the features on the unit, I am dissapointed that so many features depend on the remote control. |
[Nov 15, 1999]
Brent
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very easy to set up, sounds great, and looks nice I guess I payed more for the receiver than some others here(~$600) but I am very happy with this receiver. Nice power, great sound. |
[Oct 18, 1998]
Justin Singh
an Audio Enthusiast
Great receiver. Has lots of inputs and outputs. Sound is great and isn't distorted. The price is hefty for a Pioneer, but it has lots of great features. One overlooked thing about this receiver is it's remote. The remote is easy to use and comfortable. There are better receivers for $100 more, so I won't give this five stars. |
[Nov 03, 1998]
Ray Dodson
an Audiophile
I must say this reciever is nice. I picked one up for $600.00 dollars and I must say it kick's butt. This reciever is what I call a sleeper you don't hearmuch about it I think it get's overshadowed by it's big brother the VSX-07 elite |
[Nov 03, 1998]
Justin
an Audio Enthusiast
Actually, it is not truely THX certified. The Re-Eq must be authorized by Lucasfilm, so that's what is really is. Another thing about this receiver, the finish looks incredible. It blends perfectly with my NHT speakers(they have hi-gloss cabinets). |
[Jan 27, 1999]
Bubba
an Audio Enthusiast
When I decided to update from my DPL reciever, I looked at lots of things Icouldn't afford and lots of things in the 500 to 800 price range. Out of all |
[Apr 16, 1999]
Chuck
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased this receiver as the first step in re-building my home theatre system. I got a great deal on a demo unit ($360!) and I couldn't pass it up. That's half the price of any comparable receiver. I must admit I didn't do a lot of comparison shopping, but I did listen to a few of the Yamaha's, including one with DTS and thought it sounded slightly better (of course it was 3 times the price). I've since purchased a ton of other stuff including a brand new pair of PSB Stratus Goldi's. They are rated at 4 ohms, but the receiver seems to be handling them quite well. The sound is very good, and the receiver doesn't seem to do too much to draw unneeded attention to itself. Overall I am very happy with my purchase, but I too wish it had a few more inputs/features. Perhaps S-video switching or evern DTS, but it packs a lot of punch for the price I paid. Also the speaker terminals can't securely accept spades or pins, just bare wire or bannana plugs, but that is still a step-up over most other receivers. I am going to try and listen to the new VSX-D608 to see how it compares sound wise, 'cause it has DTS and tons of inputs. My guess is I'll be glad I got the Elite. If you can get one at anywhere near the price I paid, buy it! One more thing, Dolby Digital is WAY better than Pro-Logic, I love the sound coming from my DVD's! |
[Jul 01, 1999]
Ben
an Audio Enthusiast
I wish I could have afforded the Elite VSX-09TX model. But, I got the VSX-14 for a pretty good price and it was worth it. It had the best sound of any reciever I listened to. The 500 watt amp really puts out a lot of kick. I hardly turn the volume up over half way. The dolby digital is amazing too. I love the remote. Its easy to use and it does just about anything I'd need it to do. That's the only one I use now. The on-screen GUI is'nt anything special to look at, it's not even in color, but it is very helpful with set up and adjustments. I too wish it had more bells and whistles, but I also apreciate the simplicity of use and the elegance of it with that urishi finish. I don't really care if it has all the features of a high-end sony, as long as the engineers put the effort into what really counts, the sound. I got the Elite after an unfortunate accident with my old pioneer, which I had for about 4 years. I don't miss the old one at all now or the pioneer reciever I had before that, which I had for about 10 years. I own a 20 year old pioneer turntable that still runs like a charm. I've always had good experience with pioneer products. |
[Dec 27, 1999]
Kevin Burke
Casual Listener
Strength:
I started building my home entertainment center 15 months Bangup piece of hardware. I note many of th3e reveiwers |
[Feb 27, 1999]
Young J. Son
an Audio Enthusiast
I first listened to Yamaha versus Denon (75 watt models). Didn't like the Yamaha's bright or even shrill highs. I was almost all set to purchase the Denon which was being offered for a ridiculously low price, but just for kicks, I compared the Denon to the Elite. No competition for the Elite; even tried comparing the more expensive 2700 and the Elite just sounded richer, fatter, warmer. HT said the 2700 is more transparent than the Elite, which is probably true. The highs on the Elite are a little rolled off (or laid-back) which hurts imaging a little bit but that can easily be compensated for with slightly bright speakers or even cables. For comparison, I compared the best receiver they had in the store, the B&K 202 ($2500) and surprisingly I liked the Elite sound better. The B&K sounded thin by comparison although it was probably a little smoother. Obviously, this is a personal preference. I ran NHT 2.5 and Energy C-8's with this receiver and they both just sounded fantastic. I agree with others that this should have more inputs so I would give it a four to four and a half stars for that, but for the price I paid (fraction of list) I have to give it five stars. |