Pioneer VSX-35TX A/V Receivers
Pioneer VSX-35TX A/V Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 18, 2010]
vetrano
AudioPhile
Had ther receiver for over 8 years. Was a great receiver, did everything I wanted it to. Upgraded this year to a new Pioneer Elite (SC-25). |
[May 22, 2002]
javry
AudioPhile
Strength:
Good build quality. Very intuitive and user friendly. Excellent remote. Digital readout can be seen from across the room. Good product for the price concious or those just starting out.
Weakness:
Obviuosly a mass produced product....aimed at the low to mid fi crowd....not really sure this is a weakness...more of an observation. When reviewing a component, I always try to compare the product with others in the same category. Obviuosly, this unit won't even come close to a Theta Casa, and MC-1, or one of the Krell products. But then, given the price...my guess is it's not supposed to. So....with keeping that in mind, I find the unit to be of good build quality, capable of doing what it's supposed to do. All functions seem to work extremely well and the sound is reasonably good....again...given the units cost and purpose. I put all my money into 2 channel stuff...with a number of high end components....waiting for the DVD technology to mature a little more before I took the plunge. I used the Pioneer for DVDs and HT only. I'm now getting ready to go high end with both 2 channel and HT...so I'll be unloading the Pioneer and my BAT VK-5i for a Meridian 861, Lexicon MC-12, Krell, or Theta HTS. But for the last couple of years, the Pioneer has served me well. Similar Products Used: Yamaha, Denon, ect...... |
[Jan 20, 2001]
Keith
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great range, good bass, great sound in two-channel stereo, lots of format flexibility (Surround EX, DTS, 7-channel stereo), good remote.
Weakness:
Little overpriced but I got a deal (through a friend who works at a stereo store) that brought the price down to a level that was competitive. I probably would have purchased the VSX-33TX but it did not have a phono imput. I highly recommend the Pioneer Elite VSX-35TX receiver if you want a versitle surround receiver that sounds excellent in both two-channel stereo as well as surround modes. Because this was the first receiver I have purchased in 15 years, I spent weeks listening to and researching various receivers (including spending a lot of time on this site) and ended up with the Pioneer Elite VSX-35TX. My situation is a little different than most purchasers of surround receivers as I am using the receiver primarily as stereo receiver now and plan to add a full surround system later. As a result, the most important criteria for me in a surround receiver was its sound in two-channel stereo. Similar Products Used: Marantz SR5000, Integra 5.1, Denon AVR2801 and various Yamaha |
[Aug 20, 2001]
Mingte Cheng
Audio Enthusiast
Just add some note: |
[Aug 20, 2001]
Mingte Cheng
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
THX & DTS EX. Easy set up via on screen display. Function rename.
Weakness:
low S/N for analog souces (83dB), Remote Front speakers - Pioneer Elite TZ-F700 Similar Products Used: Well, if you guys think Technics SA-AX7 & SH-AC500D package is a similar product. |
[Jul 09, 2001]
Jon
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Everything
Weakness:
none yet Wowzers that’s what a real stereo sounds like. I used to own a Sony and I thought that it needed treble and bass. Now all I have to say is wow this is what my speakers can sound like. The separation is awesome, and even running flat this has more sound than my Sony ever did. It takes a while to setup and has a very nice on screen display. I don't have the subwoofer working, kind of odd that it doesn't seem to be putting any sound out of the preamp out even kick on sub. But the sound is amazing, the separation between center channel, surround sound and front speakers is the best I have ever heard. It also has more bass and treble running flat than my Sony receiver could put out when it was set to +10 on either setting. The remote control is awesome too, it is very large but I can throw my other ones away now. This remote can be programmed to run anything that you might have. Another nice feature is the that you can reprogram the optical ports for whatever you might need. I got the best deal ever on this receiver online at yahoo auctions sealed in box and brand-new. I would highly recommend this receiver just based on how it sounds alone. Similar Products Used: none Sony STR725 |
[Nov 03, 2001]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wide range of supported formats. Assignable digital inputs. Multi-talented remote. Fantastic sound and power. Easy to use.
Weakness:
Confusing setup (but only need to do once). Remote is ugly. The setup is a pain on this one, but once it is done, it's done. The manual is fairly easy to read and follow, but it's also essential for initial setup. |
[Jan 11, 2001]
Dennis Morin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
THX EX, user friendly, good resolution
Weakness:
The sound is on the bright side This is not an actual review, it is most of all a reply to Ted's question about if this model variable crossover frequencies. And the answer is "yes", you can set it to 80 Hz, 100 Hz, or 150 Hz. If you want to know more about this receiver (or another Pioneer product), go to Similar Products Used: N/A |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Walt Huber
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Ease of use, quality of both home theater and stereo playback. Good backlit remote
Weakness:
Only 100W for switched outlets. First you should know there is a call back on the VSX 35TX. Less than 1% of the units develop a fatal problem. I didn't know this at the time of purchase, else I would've gone with either the VSX 36TX or the Onkyo 787. I chose the 35TX, though, because it had all the power I needed for the room it is in. I have it set at -15db and it is just about right. A little more for stereo maybe, if I'm in the mood for big volume. The clarity I believe is noticeably better than my old receiver, which is admittedly a cheap thrills unit (still used by Home Theater mag for that price level reference). It is especially better at music I think. Home Theater had a favorable review of the 36TX. The 35TX is cosmetically and case wise identical, but less power and no Burr Brown. A THX theater playback is a new thing in my house and I can tell you there is a difference, but I'm not exactly sure what. It would take some time to compare a few movie segments subjectively to get a grip on the difference between THX, DD and DTS modes. There is possibly a volume difference, like some dynamic range variations. I'm just tripping on the THX for now. My speakers aren't THX spec'd. though. Anyway I'm pleased after several hours of use and just hope it doesn't turn into the 1 in 200 defective unit. I do wish I could hook up my 150W sub to the 35TX. Even the Kenwood could handle 150W. Now I have to switch it separately, and I don't always remember (sob). I would give it 5 stars for it's price range if it could just do that. So I give it 4.5 stars instead. Similar Products Used: Previous receiver Kenwood VR 309 |
[Jul 19, 2001]
Daniel
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
THX, DTS, 7.1-capable, good set-up options
Weakness:
Manual needs to be re-organized--constant redirecting My primary beef motivating this post is the subwoofer signal. This receiver has a cross-over network with 3 sets. It has a subwoofer pre-amp output. It has numerous analog and digital sound inputs. Soooo...why do I only get a subwoofer signal when playing movie soundtracks? What the hell? I don't get anything when listening to CD's, cable music channels, or the receiver's radio tuner. If I use my front speaker wiring as an input to my sub (JBL-12), then I lose the bass out of other channels. Besides, 5.1 sountracks want an avenue for that .1 signal, right? So it is like I can have either music or movies. I really want to solve this problem. If anyone else understands this issue, please reply directly, or at least here on this site. Similar Products Used: Kenwood DP-M5540 Dolby Pro-Logic 4.0 |