ROTEL RSX-965 A/V Receivers
ROTEL RSX-965 A/V Receivers
[Aug 16, 2001]
Bluto
Audio Enthusiast
This is an update to a review I posted when i first got the unit. I have used it with a variety of speakers and sources since then and think i have a pretty good overall feel of this product. |
[Nov 17, 2000]
john
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
read prior post
Weakness:
add to previous review,faulty dts decoding this is my third receiver and when it works it shines but now that the dts decoding is crapping out I'm really starting to wonder about quality control at rotel. I guss you really need a 5 year warranty just to finally get a problem free component. Id hate to have this irritating crap plague me out of warranty or have to keep shipping the sucker back if I'd bought on the internet(that's where a good dealer is worth his weight in shipping costs) I'd like to hear from anyone else having the dts problem. gonna downgrade the value to a 3 Similar Products Used: see prior post |
[Aug 03, 2000]
Marc
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
VERY clear, VERY clean beautiful power, excellent FM tuner
Weakness:
switching sources with coax digital causes intermittent LOUD blasts of WHITE NOISE The 965 is a very nice sounding reciever. I'd rank it higher if it didn't have the white noise problem. When changing channels on a digital cable box using the coax digital connection a blast of white noise would often come out instead of the audio. Same blast of white noise when changing DVDs or CDs. I had a local shop try to repair it. They failed. I sent it to Rotel. They sent me a new reciever. It had the SAME problem PLUS the power supply on the new one hummed loudly (and not a tune I recognize). My dealer tried his demo unit and it had the exact same white noise problem!!! That's 3 units with the white noise problem. Rotel doesn't seem to know what the problem is or are trying to skirt the issue. Sorry Rotel, after reading other reviews here about the same white noise problem I have lost faith in a company I respected for their excellent products. After this I would be quite heritant to purchase any of your products. Similar Products Used: Sony STR-DE515, Sony 777ES, too many demos to mention here |
[Aug 03, 2000]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Versatile - good for HT and stereo. Conservative power rating and more than anyone would need.
Weakness:
Quality control, although Rotel is very responsive in correcting any problems. Poorly designed remote. My experiences and opinions mirror those already written here. The quality control for older units, mine was purchased 3/99, keeps the RSX-965 from being an outright steal and top-flight product. I recently caught the upgrade bug and brought in a number of highly regarded separates to compare with the Rotel in stereo reproduction. Although the separates costing two and three times as much were superior, the RSX more than held its own. Similar Products Used: Separates including Bryson, Sonic Frontiers, McCormack, and Classe. Initially compared to the comparable Sherwood model. |
[Jun 26, 2000]
Adam
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean, Bright Room Filling Sound
Weakness:
HAvent found any yet THis thing is Phat! I would recommend it to anyone - easy well said out rear panel - nice speaker connectors - a ton of video and audio inputs - if you can fill this thing up you have way to much free time - The sound is supburb through my B&W speakers - And the unit looks damn good! Well done and worth the extra money over the Sony ES - I feel that the sound is better for music over movies so if you are looking for a reciever to do both and do both well this is it! Similar Products Used: Sony ES/Marantz SR-780 |
[Mar 05, 2000]
Zachary
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
I withhold judgement for now
Weakness:
volume level I just bought and hooked up my rsx965... Similar Products Used: Sony 1011 |
[Feb 20, 2000]
Jamie
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
great sound, a quality component at a reasonable price, it even has a phono jack,dts
Weakness:
poor remote features, whimpy speaker posts This is a very good receiver. I understand at the beginning when it first hit the market, there were problems with the sub output and settings. That has been corrected. This receiver sounds great in stereo and surround mode. It is nice to have the luxury of seperate systems, but if you don't have the budget or space, this is a good comprimise. Similar Products Used: luxman, yamaha, har/kar, onkyo, denon |
[Jan 18, 2000]
Joe
Audiophile
Strength:
Price.. Features
Weakness:
2 Channel Stereo I'm on a quest to replace my Rotel Pre-amp and outboard decoder(RTC-970 and RDA-975, and RB985 amp) for an all in one unit dolby digital solution. I was considering the new ROTEL RTC-965 Pre-amp, my dealer said he didn't have it in stock to demo, but he had the RSX-965 which would sound extremely similiar (RTC-965 is the RSX-965 without the amp). It just so happens that another customer was buying some speakers and was trying out 2 pairs of speakers. As I listened to the music (a few tracks from Pink floyd the wall) with the same speakers I currently own (B&W Matrix 803), it sounded simply incredible. Folks, their are no words, except to say that I felt like at home I was running a corvette(meaning my own speakers) at home with only 2 cylinders instead of 8. I said to my delaer, I have the same exact speakers and they don't sound no where nearly as good. I inspected the equipment, and the dealer had a Conrad Johnson PF2 (http://www.audioreview.com/reviews/Preamplifier/product_5891.shtml) pre-amp hooked up to a modest Acurus 100watt amp per channel amp, and feed from a Meridian 861 CD player. I then hooked up the same speakers to the RSX965 and let me tell you, it just all fell apart. The clarity, the fullness, the wide dispersion of the vocals and highs were gone! I said to my dealer, it sounds like crap. I then listened to 5.1 channel DVD, and it sounded pretty good, unless you go to a high end unit you don't hear to much difference on 5.1 movie sound track in my opinion. However, on 2 channel stereo, the unit just fell apart COMPARED to the conrad johnson pre-amp. Let's talk about the pre-amp and CD Player, it's a $2000 pre-amp, and the Meridian CD player goes for $3000. I know, I know, you all are saying that I'm trying to compare apples to oranges, and yes that's true to some degree. I then said, I want a pre-amp processor that sounds like the conrad johnson pre-amp. He replied, I only carry 2 products that are going to sound like this, the meridian pre-amp processor, or the Lexicon, nothing else. Folks, I have one thing to say, buying anything that will not produce the sound my speakers are capable of is just a crime. I'm saving my pennies and going to buy the Lexicon or Merdian. |
[Dec 13, 2000]
Clancy Sloan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Extremely clean sound, has phono preamp, excellent pro-logic decoder, more musical than most A/V units.
Weakness:
Managed to blow fuses a couple of times using auxilliary AC plugs, remote is a little scary for the rest of my family. I had a pair of AR2A speakers rebuilt by Soundsmith in San Diego, and have since gone back to the same rebuilder for matching surrounds. A good center speaker is crucial. This receiver is excellent for music and still does the job for home theater. I plan to add a Hsu Research subwoofer, but base response is excellent even without. Even my wife, who expects the sound from the TV to come from the TV, likes the sound of this in home theater mode. Similar Products Used: Replace a 15 year old Luxman, shopped Nakamichi and NAD before buying |
[Feb 23, 2001]
Felix Williamson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Processing clarity, Ease of use. DTS is sublime.
Weakness:
2 channel steroe is dull. I would love to say this amp is a bundle of joy, but I would be lying. Similar Products Used: Rotel RA935BX (2 Channel amp) |