Balanced Audio Technology VK-500 Amplifiers
Balanced Audio Technology VK-500 Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 17, 1999]
Peter
Audiophile
Strength:
Weight, power
Weakness:
Electronic, lack of fine detail, odd timbre, bright, thin To complement the post below; after a further three weeks my amp has improved, but is still not as good as it was. Whatever blew up (I'm told it wasn't necessarily an output board, just "a component" replaced in one channel only) and was replaced has really screwed it up. A definite mystery. Similar Products Used: Jeff Rowland Model 2 |
[Dec 15, 1999]
Ward Cleaver
Audiophile
Strength:
Control, smoothness, bass
Weakness:
None Further to Bazza's review, if you have invested in a VK500 with Bat Pak, do it justice by spending a few hundred extra dollars on after market power cords. They will transform it and eliminate any potential concerns about the sound being "thin" and "slow". Keep in mind that all high current devices need quality AC! |
[Dec 23, 1999]
Dudley Miller
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Gives my Thiel CS 2.3's real depth and fullness. Everything sounds more like actual instrument and voice.
Weakness:
None I added the VK 500 amplifier to a system that was powered by a Denon AVR 5700 (sounded really good). There is a Thiel center speaker, a Sunfire MK II sub, and Definitve Technology BPX surrounds. Most of the cable is Monster, with 2.2's to the Thiel front speakers. I have a Sony 7700 DVD/CD player, with a bel canto DAC 1 up sampler DAC. The VK 500 made a great difference in this system (I added Harmonic Technology AC11 power cords). I think this is a wonderful amplifier. I have listened to this system with the Krell FBP 200 and an Aragon 8088BB (not sure these designations are accurate) and I like the smoothness and fullness of the BAT VK 500. I don't understand the number of really low reviews. Maybe there is a bad synergistic problem with the other components in these systems but in mine, I wouldn't trade for anything without spending an awful lot more money and then I am not sure what I would get. It would probably be a whole new system. I am completely happy with the BAT VK II. |
[Mar 23, 2001]
Joseph
Audiophile
Do you want to read a true story about awakening into Audiophile reality? I’ve owned a Wadia 860x CD player and Martin-Logan reQuest speakers for 3 years, all hooked up through a Sony receiver. I thought they sounded great, but was I wrong! Recently, I bought a VK500 amplifier, a VK50SE preamp, Nordost Quattro Fil interconnects and Red Dawn Rev.II speaker cables. |
[Dec 08, 1999]
Bazza MacKenzie
Audiophile
Strength:
Transparency, bass, smooth detail
Weakness:
Cost After upgrading my Aragon 8008BB to the BAT VK500 with BatPak and living with it for almost 6 months, I am surprised by the mixed reviews that I read here. Perhaps I have been lucky with its' marriage to my Theta front-end and Sonic Frontiers Line 3, but this is a very good amp. Although it is no match for the Krell FPB 600, it does offer comparison to the FPB 200 at a significant cost saving. Could it be that the "close-to" single-ended design with no feedback (like the Pass designs) is just so different to most of our ears that we think it to be wrong? Could it be similar to how we perceive Magneplanar speakers when we first hear them? They are detailed, open and transparent with exceptional bass accuracy but they are so different sounding from "boxes" that we firstly think that they are not RIGHT! Well, like the Maggies, the VK500 is "RIGHT". It is different from most solid state gear - it is easy to listen to for long periods without fatigue. Similar Products Used: Aragon 8008BB, Krell FPB 200 |
[Feb 23, 1999]
Robert L.
an Audiophile
I've been living with the VK-500 for a year now and have not heard any other amp do as many things so well. Transparency that reveals the recording's deepest corners. Leading edge transients that are scarily fast and make drums sound especially tasty. Harmonics and timberal accuracy. You name it, the VK-500's got it. |
[Feb 24, 2000]
Albert
Audiophile
If theres one thing to comment on this amp, it would be that it gets HOT!!! I recently gave a call to Victor and he said thats normal. He also included that if im hooking a low impedance speaker, it'll make it hotter, since my spaekers are Hales Transcedence 8's, maybe he's right. So i decided to put small fans around the amp.(and they were very quiet) At the first listen to the amp, it didnt sound right. Everything was "out of order". Compared to the dealers demo,it sounded harsh, mainly in the highs. I thought if i gave it a sufficient break-in, it might clear up. Well......it did alright. Now the music flows like a river. The highs were crisp, transparent. The mid's had more richness to it. The bass came out like a rushing cannon!!! I was amazed from it, what a improvement!!! At that time it was hooked up to a cheap Rotel pre-amp, so i knew the amp had more than just that. Later, I heard alot of people talking about the VK-5i pre-amp. So I went ahead and bought one. I didn't acctually come home with the VK-5i, but instead the VK-5iSE, since the dealer was nice to sell it as a demo, i picked it up around $5000. With upgraded tubes, risitors, and power supplies, it had to be better than the VK-5i. When i took it home....................I gave it the first listen..........now all i can say is: AMAZING!!!!!! Need I say more? |
[Oct 12, 1999]
Mike
Audiophile
Strength:
MUSICALITY, build quality,
Weakness:
Don't know of any I have read the other reviews on this outstanding amplifier and felt compelled to respond due to the "negative" responses. I have been highly involved in high end audio for approximately 12 years. I have auditioned many amplifiers in my system, tubed and solid state. Both types have their strengths and weaknesses. The VK500 (with batpak) does a remarkable job in combining the best of both types into a completely balanced version of what most people enjoy listening to in the first place - a highly musical, detailed sound. This "behemoth" of an amplifier has a power cord for each channel, just like it was a monoblock design. Upgrading the power cord gives this amp an absolutely silent background and highly defined, deep bass. Stringed instruments sound silky smooth, brass instruments have the power and presence of a truly live performance. This amplifier truly fleshes out the entire audio spectrum with a seamless presentation. Ladies and gentlemen, yes there are a "few" and truly "very few" amplifiers out there that can compete with this one at this price point. You owe it to yourself to listen to this one if you really appreciate music... Similar Products Used: Krell KSA 250, Ayre V3 |
[Oct 28, 1999]
Peter
Audiophile
Strength:
Homogeneous, powerful, controlled, soundstage depth
Weakness:
Occasionally odd timbre, sometimes thin, lacking in fine detail I've owned the BAT for over a year and enjoyed the extra grip it has over my loudspeakers (Wilson System 5.1). It's sounds natural and better than, say, the equivalent Krell kit at rhythm and pace. I live in an apartment and don't want to aggravate my neighbours, so I'm glad that it can come alive at reasonably low volumes and still provide a realistic soundstage and bass response. Without breaking down its attributes completely into categories, it comes across as one of those products that sounds "right" straight out of the box. For nit-pickers, I'd have to draw attention to the fact that it needs good AC power (in my flats it's best after 11pm and having warmed up for at least an hour) and has a slightly "dark" presentation that is initially odd. Has anyone else noticed this about BAT kit? The midrange seems clear and unforced, there's not much that's electronic about it, but it lacks for lushness and timbre IMHO. Aside from that, it's a good product and, if weight were the only judge of performence, you get a lot for the money. Similar Products Used: Jeff Rowland Model 2 |
[Jul 22, 2000]
Craig
Audiophile
Strength:
sound to make anybody weak in the knees
Weakness:
nothing Okay, First of all, the people that right in with bad reviews are not to be trusted! Obviously they have never heard this amp, I cannot stress this enough. Unlike these mystery people, I actually own this amp( I'm sure if you were to contact these people, they don't exist). It really pisses me off when people give bad reviews, when it is more than obvious they don't own these products. All I have to say is that when paired with the right components, this is pure audio nirvana!!! I have been to the most recent Stereophile shows, and have heard the "best of the best" but like I said paired with the right components, this is absolutey incredible! I can see how people can be swayed by negative reviews, but the easiest way to see through B.S.'ers who have nothing better to do is #1 look at their spelling( if it seems obvious that they haven't graduated past 5th grade that should be the first tip-off)#2 when it seems they think they should be writing for Stereophile when instead they should be writing for Mad Magazine. Maybe the easiest way to put this; is if there are a lot of positive reviews and there are a few "crack addicts" who wright in with extremely negative reviews you should be inclined to question this. I'm not saying there are not people who have legitimate complaints, but I guarantee anyone who has heard this amp will be awe struck!! I'd be willing to bet that the dissenting opinions are Bose Lifestyle owners or have been recently labotimized(twice)!! Similar Products Used: you name it |