Blue Circle Audio BC22 Amplifiers

Blue Circle Audio BC22 Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

Power output: 125 watts per channel into 8 ohms Power requirement: 120 VAC 50/60Hz, 600 W Max; also available for 100, 200 or 240 VAC Dimensions: (w x h x d): 17.5" x 3.625" x 14.375" | 445 mm x 92 mm x 365 mm Weight (without packaging): 30 lbs | 13.6 kg Warranty: 3 year parts and labour

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-8 of 8  
[Nov 21, 2002]
Will68
AudioPhile

Strength:

clear, articulate and engaging mirange, smooth highs, tubelike. Can listen for hours with no fatigue.

Weakness:

not the deepest tightest bass... there's bigger Blue Circles for that.

First impression on lifting this amp onto my equipment rack: there's no way it can weigh only 30 pounds! Feels as heavy as my old 4B-ST which was supposed to weigh 42 pounds. First impression on playing music: Wow! big soundstage and the highs are SO smooth! Overall it's more laidback than the 4B-ST so it draws you into the music instead of shoving it into your face. Bass has nice bloom. Very good PRaT - the music ALWAYS gets my head bobbing and feet tapping but unlike Naim amps, soundstage and imaging are also impressive!

Similar Products Used:

Bryston 4B-ST, NAD 304, Passion integrated, Adcom GFA-545

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 12, 2002]
belgryphon
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Musicality, Detail, Vocal presentation. Maintains the wholeness of music. Cool running.

Weakness:

Some thermal compression during long hard use

After auditioning several amps, I decided on the BC22. Although I used it with other preamps, my comments are mostly from my experience with the BC22 mated to the BC21.1 preamp. The two definetely form a immensely musical system. The bass reaches deep (although I uspect is slightly elevated), the midbass is absolutely lush, the midrange is as accurate as I can recall ever hearing- my references are Joan Baez and Emmyolu Harris live with no amplification- As a matter of fact I find that the BC system serves the voice better than anything I ever heard. The treble is clear, extended, and non fatiguing. One way to describe the sound is to say that it is very detailed and accurate, yet it does not throw you all that detail at you, it rather lets you discern, at your leasure, all the music you can find. I drive Magnepans 1.6QR with the BC22 and the combination is magical. Its only shortcomings are on very loud passages when tha amp will rather politely compress the bass lines..

Similar Products Used:

B&K, Krell, Conrad Johnson, Odyssey, McCormack, Adcom, YBA

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 19, 2002]
Enrico
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

simply musical.

Weakness:

Bass doesn''t go very deep like my Bryston 4BST.

This is so far the best sounding solid state amp that I ever had, very musical and very sweet to my ears it makes me want to listen for hours without fatigue, not boring at all.

Similar Products Used:

Bryston, YBA, Musical Fidelity A3cr, Muse160.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 26, 2000]
Chris
Audiophile

Strength:

Absolutly musical, ability to render nuance, emotional, beutiful midrange clarity, high build quality.

Weakness:

Bass is not absolutely "slamming". Certainly not real weakness, just a fact.

Let me start of by stating that the Blue Circle BC22 is just an all around satisfying product. I won't go into alot of technical talk, but I will discuss how this fine product has impacted me. First off, let me tell you that the reason I wanted to purchase this amp was because of the tremendous experience I have had with other Blue Circle products. I picked up a Blue Circle BC21 preamp about 8 months ago and it just absolutely blew me away (refer to my summary on Audioreview). Anyway, when I received it I was impressed first by the attention to packing materials. I first pulled out the hefty little, yes the BC22 is modest in size, but hefty none-the-less (about 36 lbs!) and began the break in process.

Now, about 3 weeks later I began serious evaluation. The naturalness of the midrange is what I first took notice of. Voices sound sweet and quite palpable and insruments sound very clear and accurate. Soundstage depth is large and images are very stable. Seperation is very good and placement is accurate. I must say this, the BC22 really does not come through as an amp with any real in your face strenghts or weaknesses. It just does music very accurately and naturally. I really had a hard time trying to pick at its sonic presentation without getting lost in the music. After a few more months the little BC22 sounds even less like an amp and more like the music that's coming out of it than before.

Do be aware of this, if you are planning on hooking this baby up to full range dynamic planers, then you may want to hold off until you can afford a more powerfull amp. The Magnepan's I had when mated to the BC22 just sucked the power right out of it, but only when the SPL's started betting up there. Don't get me wrong, the BC did fine with low to moderate volume and only until it was pushed did it lose steam drasticaly. I am confident that this amp will meet every need of the person needing moderate power and who is concerned with a musical presentation, and not with exaggeration of characteristics and information within the music. Are there alot of great amps out there in the $2000.00 price range? Absolutely. It just so happens that this is the one for me. (Until I have enough money for the BC26 that is.) Highly recommended.

Similar Products Used:

Sim Audio, Adcom, Classe'

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 13, 2001]
Tom B
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Clear, dynamic, ALIVE !!

Weakness:

I don't like binding posts themselves, but I do like how they are positioned; far apart to accomodate large cables.

I guess I can agree with all the earlier positive comments. I am also at least the third person who switched from a Conrad Johnson MF Amplifier and will not go back. The CJ Amps are very good; I had the old series as did the earlier reviewers. Mine was a MF2100. I do not know how this would compare with the current generation CJ solid state amps. This has been compared with the Bryston 3B-ST. The Bryston being more precisely accurate and detailed, which may or may not be your taste in an amp. I am very pleased with my purchase.

Similar Products Used:

Conrad Johnson MF2100, Conrad Johnson Sonographe SA150, SA250

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 22, 2000]
Shelton
Audiophile

Strength:

Build quality, speed, musicality, full robust sound

Weakness:

None apparent

The sound of the BC-22 is very inviting. It pulls you into the music. The big, full, robust sound of the amp leads me to believe that the 125w rating is on the conservative side. I'm sure that there are amps out there that may give you the last word in detail or even a more transparent soundstage, but at what cost. This is a wonderful sounding amp that needs to be on your short list to audition. The McCormack DNA-125 is also very good, and was a final candidate. The Blue Circle BC-22 seemed to have life, and convey emotion. This amp replaced the CJ MF2300, and I have not regretted my decision one minute. So, if you are looking for a very well built, great sounding, reasonably priced amp, here it is!

Similar Products Used:

McCormack DNA-125, Musical Fidelity A300/A3, Conrad-Johnson MF2300

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 27, 2000]
Bob Neill
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Presence,airiness,immediacy...musicality

Weakness:

Lacks the ultimate refinement of its $6300 and $9800 stablemates



A responsible reviewer would keep an amp in his system for at least a month or so before offering a rigorous critique but I only had the amp for 3 weeks before having to send it on to a "official reviewer." And besides, I am a serious believer in the usefulness of first impressions, so here goes.

System: Naim CDX/XPS, Blue Circle BC 3, BC 22, B&W Matrix 805's; SPM interconnects, Straightwire Virtuoso bi-wired speaker cable; Electraglide Reference Triglide ac cords on the Naim and BC 3, Fat Boy Golds on the BC 22. Room is 16 x 28 with 11 foot ceilings at speaker end tapering to
around 8 feet at the other. Wood floor over cement slab.

Chief qualities: ebullience, life, airiness, energy, clarity, presence, dynamics. No surprises if you know Blue Circle electronics. The most useful comparisons I can
make from my own first-hand experience are with the Plinius SA 50 III ($3000) and 100 III ($4000), both of which spent several months in my system. To my ears, Plinius amps aim for (and achieve) remarkable smoothness at some cost, especially in the 100, in immediacy, air, and life. In comparison with the SA 50, the BC 22 has a better
overall balance and more body. The Plinius SA 50 seems to me focused on the midrange, where it exhibits a justly praised degree of magic. In comparison with the SA 100 III, the Blue Circle amp is not so noticeably warm and as a result, again,
music feels more present. My aural memory is not dependable on the two amps' comparative bass; I might give the edge to the Plinius there, though I am not aware of any deficiency of bass in the BC. (In my experience, BC amps tend to prefer detail to impact in the nether regions, so impressions of 'amount' of bass are not always instructive.) To me, the Plinius 100 succeeds largely through an absence of defects; as a result, while I liked it and could never quite fault it at anything in particular, over time it left me wanting something more - the something that all BC amps I have heard
have in spades: there-ness, is-ness. The music in the room.

In comparison with its stablemates, the BC 2's ($6300) and 2.1's ($9800), the amps that have come to define the norm for me (I have not heard the BC 6 at $3700), the BC 22 lacks a degree of touch, refinement, and delicacy, attributes that matter a great deal to me. And the monoblocks take away what we like to call 'the last veil' that stands between us and where we want to go - as they should! But the approach is recognizably the same: music (meaning musicians and their instruments) first.

Two additional and polar comparisons: The BC 22 is much better in every way than both the Conrad-Johnson solid state amps which, to my ears, offer a bland pleasantness in the name of musicality; and the Krell KAV 300, which offers an
analysis of what's on the recording in lieu of its content. I'm sorry that I can't offer the most obvious comparison, with the Bryston 3B ST, which I've never heard. My guess,
based on informed hearsay, is that these two amps would make excellent competitors, the differences being largely a matter of taste. I have the impression that the BC puts a
premium on presence and palpability, the Bryston on power and resolution. But if this is your price point, this is the comparison to make.

Lecture: In the High End, I have learned that it is the vision of the designer that tells the story - and not all designers have them! Because their market is relatively small(I'm not talking about the handfull of Krell, Levinson, B&W sort of folks here), High End designers don't have to design for a considerable variety of tastes, compromising
"character" and a point of view to win and maintain wide acceptance. With Bryston, Blue Circle, Naim, and the others we can all name, once you've heard the designer's sound, you know where you are and what to expect. And you know whether that's where you want to be. I found out a year or so ago that Gilbert Yeung has my number. Again, I want to feel the presence of the musicians and their instruments, above all.
Like most of us, I love the sound of music as much as its content. Tubies claim they get what I'm after and perhaps some of them do; but I've yet to hear it from an all-tube
amp with both the body and clarity I get from hybrid Blue Circle equipment - and the BC 22 is designed to couple with the BC 21, a two-tubed younger brother to my BC 3
which won't be here until later this summer. The BC 3 is definitely a factor in what I'm hearing from the BC 22.

So, from my corner, if you want to know what the Gilbert Yeung/Blue Circle vision of music is, can't afford more than the $3650 which the BC 21 and BC 22 retail for as a
pair, and need the 125 watts the 22 provides, this is definitely where I'd start.

I am uncomfortable rating equipment because the AR rating system doesn't really allow for price points - and the value rating doesn't quite get at that either. If the Blue Circle BC 6, BC 2's, and BC 2.1's are 5 stars, which they clearly are, what is a BC 22 that gets a great deal of their sound for a fraction of the cost? I don't believe in grade inflation but I do believe in proportion. In the $2000-4000 price class, for solid state amps putting out 100-125 watts, the BC 22 is a five. Okay?










Similar Products Used:

Natural competition is Bryston 3B ST, which I have not heard. Plinius SA 50III, 100 III, Krell KAV 300, etc.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 26, 2000]
Mike Pageau
Audiophile

Wow...This is the first solid state amp from a company specializing in exotic tube gear.

The result? Probably the best sounding amp in its class.The fit and finish is first rate. Only premium parts are used. No plastic nuts on this beauty.

The rear apron is intelligently designed. Lots of room for large cables.

But what sets Blue Circle products apart from the others,is that even the president of the company, Mr. Gilbert Yeung, will field your questions and assist you if you have specialized requirements.

This is not my first purchase from this company and it won't be the last.These guys are world class and first rate.

Visit their site: www.bluecircle.com

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-8 of 8  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com