Carver Audio M-1.0t Amplifiers
Carver Audio M-1.0t Amplifiers
[Mar 26, 2001]
Mike Vogelpohl
Audiophile
Strength:
Amazing power and clarity.
Weakness:
Matching quality speakers required. I just read some of the other reviews of this product and wanted to add a few helpful comments. First, I use two units in bridged mode. |
[Mar 26, 2001]
Mike Vogelpohl
Audiophile
Strength:
Amazing power and clarity.
Weakness:
Matching quality speakers required. I just read some of the other reviews of this product and wanted to add a few helpful comments. First, I use two units in bridged mode. |
[May 11, 1999]
Dave Cole
an Audio Enthusiast
Gee, this is my first try, so bear with me, please. I had a hard time deciding whether to call myself an "Audio Enthusiast" or an "Audiophile" because the latter often implies being able to spend more money on sound than I can afford to. I'm also not precisely sure we're talking about the same equipment, but here goes. |
[May 22, 2000]
Dave Smith
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
small, rack mountable, pretty face plate, bridgeable
Weakness:
hum in transformer, audio output. if you don't know better it is a powerful amp. For those people complaining of the pop and crackel at power up and shut down. there is a tech note from carver that outlines a modification to the amp to minimize this noise. I have modified my mt1.0 and it made a large difference. There are several other mods that can and need to be done to fix the bugs in the amp. check with an older carver warranty shop to see if they still have the documentation. I no loger use this amp it sits in the closet doing nothing (2 years) I am glad i recieved this amp for cheap money . I use a yamaha mx-1000u with a cx-800 driving late 70's jbl 4311 studio monitors. The carver sucks wind compared to this setup. The caver spent some of its life driving my sub woofer( severe over kill) the sub is collecting dust also. The fact that I still have the amp means it is not total junk. Similar Products Used: (bought in 89)mx-1000u amp - cx800 preamp |
[Mar 20, 2001]
Jason
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lots of power
Weakness:
not lots of definition, particularly at lower listening levels I've read a number of seemingly contradictory reviews on this amp, some of which I agree with, and some of which I don't. |
[Jul 29, 1999]
Dave Marceau
an Audio Enthusiast
Well, after reading these reviews, I am utterly amazed by the differences of opinion. You would think two different products were being reviewed. In short, the M1.0t running mono-bridged, (Read:1000 Watts RMS, 20-20k, 8 Ohms .15 THD) driving an efficient loudspeaker is nothing short of astounding. Talk about headroom.... My lord. I own a pair of 1.0ts, driving a set of Klipsch Courus IIs. Controlling these are either a Carver 895 or Yamaha DSP-A1000 depending on whether I want to be AT the concert with Sonic Holography or directly at the epicenter of an earthquake in home theater mode. I'm talking 110 db of sound out of one pair of speakers and the meters on the 1.0ts don't even blink off idle. I measured continuous 126 db (The max on my realistic sound pressure meter) and wasn't even close to the peak LED. By the way, for those of you that are digusted by horns, you haven't heard a pair of Courus IIs set up properly with 1000 watts of clean carver power driving each one. I am not even going to comment on the lack of bass comments as they are just a joke. Any comments of questions..email me |
[Oct 29, 1998]
Greg Savoie
an Audio Enthusiast
I owned the Carver 1.0t for about 6 months, and I really wasn't at all happy with it. The bass was very thin and slappy. It really lacked warmth. The highs were very harsh and the midrange was too pronounced. I compared it to a NAD 2200 100 watt amp, and the NAD outperformed it in every department by a wide margin. |
[Jun 08, 2001]
George
Audiophile
Strength:
Good clean power with room to spare. Attractive design. Great value
Weakness:
Pop at shutdown. Poor AC cords. I have two amps in dual mono mode and I must say that their power is unbeatable. Bridged, these M1.0ts are a small nuclear powerplant. The bass is deep and powerful at all volume levels and I'm using KEF C-75 apartment style speakers. My speakers are small towers and still these amps produce a forceful bass. The mids and highs are great and my basic NAD preamp's tone controls are flat with no loudness button on. When you have these amps or any in a bridged mono mode, a respected dealer where I live suggested a tube preamp to run them or at least a tube ransistor hybrid. I myself have taken these amps to a stereo repair shop only to install in each a very heavy 14 guage 300V 3prong power cord. Your bass will be smoother at higher power levels. I'm also using MIT speaker cables with network boxes to smoothen the sound which does work. Whenever you use amps in a dual mono mode, please use cables with network boxes. This includes speaker cables, CD interconnect, and amp to preamp interconnect. Similar Products Used: Carver M-500t. Carver Receivers. Rotel amps. |
[Dec 31, 2001]
Rick
Audiophile
Strength:
More Current,voltage and tonal refinement at it's price point than anything before or since. Period.
Weakness:
Not many, but there are three that are unequivocally true: a VERY soft transformer(physical, not audio) hum and a slight buzz at the output, probably from the Mag/Field transformer also, but NO HUM!) and third,insuffienctly heat sinked for constant bridged mono operation into sadistic (16hz/1ohm/full output/@FIVE HOURS)speaker loads. The controversy boils down to two things in my opinion. Similar Products Used: Krell, Boulder, Mac,IOW: oodles of the deadweight metric tonnage champeeens of all time. |
[Jun 05, 1998]
Gary OShields
an Audiophile
While working at a local hi-end audio retailer someone came in with a Carver amp 200w/ch to A-B with some others and to tell you the truth EVERY amp in the store down to a 60w/ch Rotel amp ate it and spit it out in every catagory.Whant music look elsewhere! |