Conrad-Johnson MV-60 Vacuum Tube Power Amplifier Amplifiers
Conrad-Johnson MV-60 Vacuum Tube Power Amplifier Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 13, 2019]
tcc
Strength:
My version is the mv60se. I bought it NOS, brand new in 2018, from a local dealer. I took it months to break in, God knows how many hours, perhaps because my speakers are 90db sensible, and I live in a small flat, which makes it impossible to listen to music very loud without going deaf, situation not to be desired for the ones who like music of course, although not hearing the noisy naked apes we are can be pure bliss. The amp initially was very opaque, soon to sound harsh, bright afterwards, then desperately flat sounding and restrained - boring - and ... many many hours later: very musical and engaging at last! Or should I say addictive? Even without a proper preamplifier, because I ran it directly from my humble Cambridge Audio CXN first version, the sound is very musically communicative, punchy and detailed. I had the opportunity to compare it at home with the excellent Hegel Röst, which is snappier and more revealing of the ambience details, and I liked the CJ more. It has an overall more natural sound with piano and vocals, presenting more transparency in those areas, also being more weighty and punchy ... more meaty, I should say, although showing less macro dinamic swings than the above mentioned integrated, at least without a good preamp. Also I listened to with a vintage Premier Three pre not in very good shape, adding much noise, and even so ... Whoa!!!... the stage widened, the sound gained still more punch, 3d depth, dinamics and tone. I hadn’t the faintest idea what a good pre can do! So, go fetch a good pre for a enormous upgrade from direct source connection. A keeper, no doubt. Much recommended. Weakness:
Power transformer is mechanically noisy, but nothing one cannot get used to. Not exactly a paragon of beauty, even though built like a tank, visibly something to outlast the owner. Prepare your heirs. OPTs set to 4ohms, without binding posts or keys to change it to 8 or 16ohms, although it can be done from inside by altering some wire places, soldering iron needed. Instructions to do so can be easily found in some blogs, if you want to try it DIY. Not very difficult. Price Paid: 2000
Purchased: New
Model Year: 0000
|
[May 19, 2011]
Raj J
AudioPhile
Some of you have seen my latest reviews of this amp, where I've got the MV60 "SE" version, which is more powerful than the normal mv60. I've been using the mv60se for nearly 3 years now, and have upgraded a few things since 2008...
|
[Aug 31, 2008]
Rajeev J
AudioPhile
Strength:
sound stage, imaging, depth everything. good power for adequate bass control, glorious mids and highs you cannot want anything more; the MV60 is rated at 50 wpc, where as the MV60se is 60 wpc, and certainly does sound a lot more powerful than just 60watts (drives more like a 100 watter) JUST SOUNDS RIGHT!
Weakness:
None! my association with Conrad Johnson goes back over 10 years, first had the MV50 and a PV8 pre-amp (glorious sound) driving a pair of Paradigms studio 80. Then I upgraded to the Premier 11A and PFR (solid state mosfet pre-amp) again Glorious sound driving a pair of Magneplanars MG3.5/R. probably the best I ever owned for many years since 2002. Had to migrate to Australia for higher studies, and have now somewhat settled in Melbourne, also had to sell the previous system and I cried for nearly 3 years. Finally vola! I now am the proud owner of a brand new MV60SE and a PV10 AL (in mint condition) pre-amp. What a fantastic combo!
Customer Service purchased from Caxton Audio (sound reference in Melbourne), Australia.
Similar Products Used: CJ premier 11A, MV 50, CAV 50 (for a short while); another very nice unit if you can get hold of one, but the CAV 50 is integrated. |
[Dec 27, 2005]
Mr Peabody
AudioPhile
Strength:
sound quality. It should be able to push most real world speaker loads. Ease of set up and biasing
Weakness:
None found yet I wanted to find an audio system that would convey music in a more engaging way. I was using krell which is incredible for what it does. I auditioned Audio Research in my home system and did not care for it. I then brought in the Conrad-Johnson PV14Ls2 and the MV60 and found what I was looking for. This combo defines the term "musical". I've read reviews on these pieces and after talking to an engineer friend of mine I discovered what makes the Conrad Johnson so great is it's ability to convey micro and macro dynamics better than anything I have ever heard. Some have come to associate the term "detail" with "analytical" or almost a negative. The type of detail the Conrad Johnson gives is definitely a positive. You will be able to hear a distinction between each background vocalist's contribution and a distinction between various horns in a horn section. These won't sound like one big sound but come through as distinct and separate parts. Vocals will have more texture and audible description. This is the type of detail you will get. The tubes will give the music a presence or live feel that I've not heard from solid state. The Krell has unequalled slam and impact, in my book, of a live show but something still told my brain it was artificial while the Conrad Johnson lacks that slam it does have the ability to fool my brain into excepting the performance could be in my living room. The highs are wonderful, they do not sound rolled off and cymbals have nice hang time and natural decay. On certain recordings I can tell the Conrad Johnson doesn't play as low as my Krell did but the Conrad Johnson does not sound rolled off on the bottom end. The bass frequencies it does cover, are nicely detailed and very full sounding. The soundstage has a depth that I haven't experienced before. It's hard to explain but for example on the soundtrack to The Choir you could really feel the spaciousness of where it was they were singing from and it was more than just a reverb it was more a spacial que that went back beyond your rear wall. On other recordings you get a feel of placement of musicians front to back not just spread across on one plain. I had reservations at the MV60's 55 wpc rating as I was using a 250 wpc solid state amp. My speakers are 86 dB Dynaudio t2.5's. I'm not going to try to tell you it filled the krell's shoes power wise but the MV60 was surprisingly strong and pushes my speakers to an adequate level. I am also very happy with the MV60's ability to handle all types of music, as long as the recording is good I haven't noticed any musical congestion. The Conrad Johnson gear performs way beyondit's price point. I am thrilled with this combo and cannot give it a high enough recommendation. I am using an Audio Note 1.1x DAC which I prefer over my Krell's internal DAC. I use the Audio Note Lexus to connect the DAC to the preamp and an Siltech New Yorker connect between the pre and power section. I have Transparent from power amp to speakers. Purchase price is as demo unit. Similar Products Used: Krell, Arcam, Adcom |
[Oct 03, 2003]
LL1
AudioPhile
Strength:
Gorgeous midrange that makes jazz, vocals have unusually beautiful life Great high end detail and clarity without any hint of brightness Reasonably tight bass control, but not as good as Krell/Bryston who are among the best even among solid state amps However, the key here is value. My experience is that relative to many more expensive amps (which I have not discussed here because of the cost differential), the MV60 more than holds its own in terms of midrange & high end clarity and beauty. So you get that (most important part) for much less money, and you still get good bass control.
Weakness:
See above (reasonably tight bass control) but for those seeking tightfisted control, this could be considered weakness when compared to Krell/Bryston, even Forte. Current system: Celestion SL6si Conrad Johnson PV14 NAD 5000 CD player Cambridge Audio T500 tuner Velodyne F-1000, Foundation series Audioquest Crystal cable, Audioquest emerald interconnects Was searching for an amp to make these [old but quite smooth & musical] speakers really sing. And the mv60 delivers beautifully. As directly compared with Forte 4 (very smooth, 50wpc solid state amp), Krell KAV 300i, Bryston 4BST, the MV60 delivered what I personally was looking for: unusually gorgeous midrange (something that makes you say "wow -- unusually good", high end clarity that had surprisingly more detail than the Krell, and reasonably good pace for modern rock, hip hop. (Krell boogied better, but had nowhere near the smooth high end for jazz singers, strings, etc...which matters to me despite my listening to hip hop, club music as well). As always in audio, it all depends on what you want. But if want reasonably good boogie, phenomenal midrange and very clear but still smooth high end clarity that compares to significantly more expensive amps, for $2795 full retail, I personally did not have to look any further. Separately, I have heard the mv60se has better punch as loses very little of the mid-range beauty that is generally is an inherent strength of tubes. Worth a try? Similar Products Used: Krell KAV300i, Forte 4, Bryston 4BST, Mark Levinson, McIntosh, NAD amps, Madrigal, |