Earmax Headphone Amp Amplifiers
Earmax Headphone Amp Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 19, 2007]
Jorn S.
AudioPhile
Strength:
See above. Sooo musical!
Weakness:
Well, if you compared to solid state, rather than to real live music, you might take a while to get used to the sound. Tubes do sound more laid back. But as I said, they also sound more real. So, decide for yourself. Earmax Pro
Similar Products Used: X-Can V3, Lehmann BLC |
[Feb 19, 2007]
Jorn S.
AudioPhile
Strength:
Great dynamics, very deep bass, extended treble. Good soundstage. But that's just technical terms. Above all, the EMP has an unbelievably immediate, authentic sound. As close to being there, as I have been.
Weakness:
Nothing comes to mind. Well, if youhave used solid state so far, it might take some getting used to. Compare to live music, not to other gear. Earmax Pro
Similar Products Used: Some headphone amps by Head and Pro Jet, Musical FIdelity X-Can V3, Lehmann BLC. |
[Oct 09, 2001]
abel pei
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very clear, built in e.q. and crossover, subwoofer adjustable, good looking, lots of power=8 volts, great product and very nice deatils added with it, built in shock alarm, and 3 rca outlets
Weakness:
not a detatchable face, very pricy, hard to get, can only use if you have amps This is the best head unit that i have ever purchased, but it is hard to come by and very expensive. Similar Products Used: premier, jvc, and regular pioneer head unit. |
[Apr 11, 1998]
S.B.
an Audiophile
After auditioning the EARMAX headphone amp and comparing it to Musical Fidelity X-Cans, X-PSU power supply and X-10D CD player buffer, I was truly impressed with the EARMAX. The cost of the 3 Musical Fidelity products equals the price of EARMAX so this is a fair comparison. First of all the product is the coolest looking piece of equipment I have seen, especially if you are into tubes. The resin box sports 3 tubes sticking out of its top with a gold wire forming a protective barrier for the tubes. Listening in the dark gives the "tube glow" and gives you a cozy feeling. After about an hour of warm up (the unit I auditioned was a demo so there was no break-in time involved) I plugged in my Sennheiser HD-600 headphones and sat down to listen. Right away I was blown away by the bloom the instruments had! I right away assumed this will come at the expense of transient and resolution capabilities. That never happened. On a close mike accoustical guitar solo recording, the leading and trailing edge transients were there in all their glory. The strings had tremendous speed and attack but also a sense of fullness and bloom, something I have not heard with solid state headphone amps yet. On some solo vocal CD's, the voices had alot more body to them, you could hear the singers take in a breath during pauses and somehow the musical message was alot more clear and I felt a sense of singers presense much more clearly and alot less veiled. While listening to some high enery jazz recordings, I was truly impressed with how deep, tight and controlled the base was! This was not something I expected from this tube product. |
[Dec 26, 1998]
James T. Kirk
an Audio Enthusiast
I'm not going to profess to being something more than I'm not, but I know good-sounding music when I hear it. The Earmax coupled with the Sennheiser HD-600 is a winner. Rich soundstage and clarity, a tighter and deeper base than constipation, the Earmax can improve upon any source. I tested it with a crappy CD player and the sound improved so much that I couldn't think of using the CD player without the Earmax unless, of course, you couple it with a a high-priced reference system. For the price, you could not get the same sound without a system ten times its price, but then again comparing a headphone system to a speaker system is like comparing apples and oranges. There are limitations to a headphone system, but the Earmax and HD-600 will not disappoint and will in fact surprise. I tested it with the Proceed CDP and Mark Levinson No. 39, and was sold on those players. The Earmax is that good and it could only be made better by better components. For those who are wondering what audiophiles are talking about, the Earmax can explain it to you for a small fraction of the price. |
[Mar 21, 2001]
Marc Bratton
Audiophile
Strength:
Lush wonderful tube sound in spades. Very good inner detailing that sounds natural, not etched. Excellent build quality. Drop dead cuteness. Drop dead quiet-there is no tube hiss, rush, roar, or hum.
Weakness:
It can only drive headphones of 300 ohms or higher, unless you get the EarMax Pro version, which costs $150.00 more. The expense of tube replacement, while reasonable, may be a factor to consider. Rob Damm's right about this one...this is a great little headphone amp. It makes my HeadRoom Supreme and Bryston sound like they have fur on them, by comparison. Similar Products Used: HeadRoom Supreme, Bryston B60 headphone jack. |
[May 25, 2001]
Brian
Audiophile
Strength:
Sweet tube sound in spades. Explosive bass. Dead silent noise floor. Fits in the palm of your hand.
Weakness:
Build quality - they no longer come in the classy looking metal chassis, but plain plastic. This is a review of the upgraded Earmax Pro. Currently I'm using it to drive my Grado RS-1's with a NOS Sylvania 12AT7 and a pair of Russian military 6922's replacing the stock tubes. The sound of this diminutive unit is awesome. Smooth, full bodied, and adsolutely unfatiguing. The bass is very uncharacteristic of most tube designs - it's rich, weighty, deep, rippling, fat bass! I love it! The midrange is so pure, and the highs are extended but have that tube sweetness. Sense of space and spatial elements are excellent but a tad behind the Sugden. If you love the sound of tubes but not the lean bass I can highly recommend this amp. It just doesn't get any better than this... Alright it does, but it'll cost you 5k. Start saving your pennies! Similar Products Used: Headroom Airhead, ASL MG-Head DT, MF X-Cans V2, Sugden Headmaster. |
[Apr 08, 2000]
Hunt
Audiophile
Strength:
Exquisite sweet detail without harshness
Weakness:
Fuggedaboudit Listening to a Patty Larkin CD (Good Thing) last night, I was stunned by the delicate detail and magical midrange. It was a revelation to me how much treble detail you can get with no harshness. It was also a revelation how musical and exciting Larkin's stuff is - it sounded a little flat on my speakers (Maggie 1.6s driven by NAD 514 CDP; Emotive Erato preamp, GTA SE-40 amp, standard). The Earmax gives me something to shoot for in my preamp/amp/speaker system. Compared to the headphone jack of my NAD C340, the Earmax has a fuller, more liquid midrange and no harshness in the treble. Other headphone amps I may try someday: Wheatfield HA-2; David Berning MicroZOTL. But I'm in no hurry. |
[Aug 11, 2000]
Rob Damm
Audiophile
Strength:
This will let you know what audiophiles are talking about without putting you in the poor house. Bloom, inner detail, crystalline highs, stygian bass... It's all here, just smaller.
Weakness:
So "cute" your wife might want it for herself! With this little jewel, and a pair of Sennheiser 580's (total cost: under 800.00) you'll be able to hear all your sources have to offer. Honestly, I've spent about 2000.00 (Nautilus 805)on speakers, another 2500.00 (C-J CAV50) on an amp, and I can say that the Earmax/580 combo is the closest I can get to the music. I'd imagine I'd have to spend a lot more... maybe by a factor of ten... to get this kind of detail and effortless presentation with a speaker/amp combo. Of course, headphone are inherintly limited (they are stuck on you head!!) as far as soundstage and spacial resolution go, and I'm not letting my speakers gather dust or anything, but this is the real deal: a mainline into the music. Similar Products Used: Headroom Supreme and Basestation one, Musical Fidelity X-Cans, Headroom Airhead, Headphone jacks on portable CD players. |