Hafler 9505 Transnova Amplifiers
Hafler 9505 Transnova Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 06, 1998]
Mark
an Audiophile
I have been using the 9505 with my Mirage M5si speakers for 3 years. Thebottom is very controlled, not too warm. A good match for M5si's as they can |
[May 02, 1998]
Paul Lindemann
an Audiophile
I've had the opportunity to listen to the Trasnova, and I had difficulty in determining my lack of satisfaction. The sound was transparent and the transient response was adequate. The bass was tight - though no one would mistake the sound for "live". The mids were speedy and revealing. |
[Jul 08, 1998]
GREG
an Audiophile
I had this amp for several days, was not impressed at all, at low volume it sounded bad no dynamics until you opened it up lacked on the top end.shop around for 2200.00 way over priced. try cinepro www.cinepro.com. |
[Oct 10, 1998]
Jeff
an Audio Enthusiast
How can you do better than this amp? Stereophile rated it's predecessor, the 9500, class "b" in '93 and the 9505 has been tweeked and refined since then. The Transnova cicuitry has been through numerous updates and the amp now has the diablo circuit to improve headroom. I love it's sound and think it's without peers in this price range. Adcom, Rotel, B&K, Accurus....not even close in terms of either sound or build quality. I listened to Aragon and McCormick and chose Hafler. |
[Mar 12, 2000]
Robert W.
Audiophile
Strength:
Powerful; clear; tight bass; sweet highs; bridgeable
Weakness:
Audio "snobs" look down at the Hafler name from their loafty almost Heavenly little purches.(It makes them feel good.) I've built quite a few systems, have freinds with nice systems, and I've spent time listening to a lot of system combinations in Hi-End shops around the east coast. (The nature of my job.) I've yet to come across an amp. that has caused me to say "Thats a poor amp." Or "Wow, who could live with that?" It doesn't happen. Amps. do have different characteristics just as all the other components. As well as wires and cables. Sometimes certain combinations go together better than others. (Sound better together.) I bought my first 9505 in '96 and liked it so much I bought another in '97 and are using them bridged as mono blocks. In my family there are three pairs of different model Haflers being used this way. The systems are different but very similar. A common factor. Another common factor is that we are very happy with them. That's what counts. Stereophlie magazine liked the amps. and so did Audio magazine. Not that it means everyone should like them in every system. I don't claim to be one of the rare and special "Golden Ears" that are out there. Lucky them. It just seems that there are about a million or more of these rare and specially gifted people out there today. Go figure. If it works for me and I like what I hear, that's what counts to me. The 9505's really work for me in my system. Other people who listen seem to think so too. Highly recommended by me. I'll give five stars for value, they aren't $5k to $35k each and four for overall only because they aren't Krells or Mark Levinsons etc. Similar Products Used: Denon; Yamaha; other Haflers; have sat in Hi-end shops around the east coast listening to different amps / systems. |
[Nov 17, 2000]
The Defiler
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
It rules,rules!
Weakness:
No balanced inputs!
Similar Products Used: Adcom GFA 7500, Rotel RMB 1095 |