McCormack DNA 1 Deluxe Amplifiers
McCormack DNA 1 Deluxe Amplifiers
[Nov 16, 2001]
Jack
Audiophile
GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT AMP!! the best solid state in its class very palpable soundstage. honestly 6 stars, truly 5 stars |
[Nov 16, 2001]
Rasiman
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
see below
Weakness:
No DIY up grade kit one of the most wonderful amp i've ever heard! sweet punchy transparence but warm. the soundstage and imaging are number ONE. world class product with bargain price!! work very OK with Nautilus 805! Big big thanks to steve McCormack for the great amp and your patient to answering my question via email. world class service too!! still waiting for the upgrade version queuing next month Similar Products Used: A3CR, Aragon 8008 |
[Jan 28, 2002]
Peter
Audiophile
This is one of the greatest bargain in high end audio i've ever heard. working a great job with my BC 3 Despina or TLC-1 Deluxe preamp.... doing a very big macho sound..... very highly recommended. but used DNA-1 right now... and start experiencing great music Similar Products Used: Cary CAD 300B signature |
[Apr 09, 2000]
Fred
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth ,detailed ,good bass,good depth and soundstage.Non fatiguing.
Weakness:
Non existing in upgraded versions. I have had this used amp almost a month now and chose it over my 3BST that I compared it to.While the Bryston had a little more bass slam and a tad more detail,the DNA-1 Deluxe was smoother overall and I sold the 3BST.I plan to get the revision A upgrade when my budget allows and this will bring the already good performance up a couple of levels in all areas,and it then will easily surpass many amps in its price range. Similar Products Used: Bryston 3BST B&K 442EX |
[Jan 26, 1997]
Neil Lipton
an Audiophile
A cautionary note on the McCormack DNA 1. Despite its power and sterling review in Stereophile, this amplifier tends to sound hollow in certain very good systems. I took my DNA one to a friend's house who was frustrated with the one hour warm-up time required by his Sonic Frontiers amp and thought the DNa 1 might be the answer to his needs. Voices in particular has a hollow sounding quality on his Infinity RS-1Bs. It was obvious to both of us. Agin, I took the McCormick to the house of someone who had Martin-Logan electrostatic speakers and the same quality was apparent. I have B&W 802s on which the hollowness was less apparent and on which the McCormick can be utilzed to take advantage of the 802's stunning dynamic rangebut in the end I sold it for $1,000 and purchased an old Audio Research D115 for #1,100 which is significntly better in every respect except brute power. In fact, the D115 is one of th great bargaing on the used market today. It tests beautifuly and is built like a rock. Compare the two if you can and you will hear the differnce plainly. The McCormickis not a bad amplifier but it does not live up to its extraordinary press in my opinion. |
[May 07, 1999]
Scott
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned a DNA-1 Dlx for over three years. Overall the DNA-1 has been a satisfying amp, but not without it's quirks. It has alot of drive and a midrange that is rich and realistic sounding. This is combined with a bass that is powerful but a touch soft, and a little thick sounding. Speaker placement is critical to get the right amount of control and pitch to the bass. The treble can be a bit hot and brash, yet the treble is also rolled off sounding at the same time. Use of the right cables help to control this. I have found that Transparent and MIT cables work well with this amp. I have read in a number of reviews that indicate the DNA-1's soundstage is poor. I haven't experienced this, when everything else is set up properly the DNA-1 provides a very engaging listening experience. |
[Nov 16, 2001]
Rob Lee
Audiophile
Strength:
Great sound, well built, upgradable, incredible value
Weakness:
None for the price The McCormack DNA-1 is a great amp. It is an AMAZING amp when upgraded by SMc audio. I used the deluxe version for about five years before upgrading the amp to the Revision A Gold. I was always happy with the amp, thinking it was the best amp I could afford for the money. But after upgrading the amp, I feel that it is the best amp I can purchase regardless of price. I did not make any changes to my system while the amp was being upgraded so I could evaluate the improvements (did not move speakers, change interconnects, etc.). As soon as I plugged in the new amp I noticed a huge improvement. After letting it break in for a few weeks the improvement became even more dramatic. Similar Products Used: Mark Levinson, Classe, Proceed, Sunfire, Rotel, Harman Kardon |
[Jan 01, 1998]
Kurniawan Tedjo
an Audiophile
simply the best with my system. Of course all mambo jumbo parts such as cable, line stage, speaker, D/A converter counts. |
[Dec 28, 1997]
Rick Campbell
an Audiophile
System:preamp Audible Illusions Mod 3A |
[Dec 18, 1997]
Shah Harits
an Audio Enthusiast
Bought this a few months ago.Previously owning an Audiolab System. I found a major improvement in all areas. I Don't understand why some Mag. using an Audiolab Amplification System as their Reference... |