McCormack DNA-2 Deluxe Amplifiers
McCormack DNA-2 Deluxe Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 02, 2006]
randy barron
Casual Listener
Strength:
power dependability and built in the USA
Weakness:
none Id say Ive hade this amp for 8 to 9 years Its a dna2 deluxe s#525 this amp has never been In a repair shop .I use a pair of definitives with I think around 250 watt subs In cab.A sunfire preamp .I have yet to hear any thing that can match this system I would like to upgrade the amp not that It needs It .but If you can make a exellent amp better Id like someone to e-mail me and tell me how and where to go only the people who have done this upgrade need to respond. all In all I think you will never find a better amp than the dna2 In this price range Customer Service bought amp at wavelength audio In dallas new In box ted the person I bought from was the best .If you read this thanks your the best Similar Products Used: bridged pair of mc2250s with c-28 not even touched this dna2 |
[Sep 24, 2003]
Scubadaddy123
AudioPhile
Strength:
Limitless power, much more musical through the midrange than most SS amplifiers....
Weakness:
No handles...this beast is almost 100 lbs and it's hard to move by yourself. Let me start by saying that I've owned both the DNA-2 Deluxe and a separate DNA-2 Deluxe with the full blown Rev A offered by Steve McCormack. The differences are pretty significant. But with that said let me start with a review of the stock DNA-2 Deluxe. What a value! This truly a remarkable amplifier sounding much smoother & fuller than the CA-200, CA-201, CA-300 or CA-301, all of which I've personally owned. I also believe that this amp if more musical than either Levinson or Krell....are you beginning to get the impression that I really liked the stock DNA-2 Deluxe? Yup! The Pass X250 & X350 are a 'skosh' smoother in the upper midrange than the stock DNA-2 Deluxe, but when you listen to the DNA-2 Deluxe with the Rev A, then I can easily say that I've NEVER heard another SS amp that is smoother, period. The original msrp on the stock DNA-2 Deluxe was $5000, but can be found for $2,500 or so on the used market (depending on PCs, condition, etc.). The Rev A from Steve McCormack cost $2,500, period, and a used Rev A can be found for around $4,000-$4,500, again depending on condition, PCs, etc.). The bottom line is the Rev A is LIMITLESS in it ability to get the most out of hard to drive speakers. I still find it hard to believe that a SS amp can sound this musical through the midrange. Remember, I'm a tube head and have owned many, many high powered tube amplifiers. I will not say that the DNA-2 Deluxe or the Rev A unit is more musical than a high powered tube amp, it's not. But the draw backs of owning a tube amp (heat, maitenance, distortion & noise) are sometimes intolerable. I live in Texas and my Sonic Frontiers Power 3 monoblocks made me run my A/C continually in the summer. But the bottom line is the McCormack DNA-2 deluxe is an excellent amplifier, and the Rev A is simply the best high powered SS amp I've owned...and I've owned a ton....check my FB on AudiogoN under 'Scubadaddy123'. I'm currently using a BAT VK-5i tube preamp with the Rev A, and I think I've found the best of both tubes & SS. It is a wonderful combination and I highly recommend both pieces. Enjoy the music Similar Products Used: the list is endless.... |
[Feb 04, 2000]
Michael Girardi
Audiophile
Strength:
As listed in IAR review
Weakness:
None I agree with all reviews below. I have owned the DNA2 LAE for 1 year. I upgraded from 2 Golden Tube SE40SEs. This amp has big #$@$%. My input is how to really make this amp sing. I first purchased a Polycrystal UHD amp stand ($325). This was much better than sitting on MDF board. When I replaced the 3 polycrystal cones with 1" diameter ball bearings with undersized silicone tubing placed on to the ball bearing (from Rosinante Dark Matter shelf supplied hardware), the transparancy,speed, and palletability took a major set forward. Use of the ball bearing feet directly couples the amp to the nonresonating Polycrystal UHD stand. All of the attributes listed in the IAR review are further enhanced by this tweak. |
[Aug 23, 2001]
j ragan
Audiophile
Strength:
Huge soundstage (width & depth), clear imaging, fast, well-
Weakness:
None identified This is an upgrade from the Krell 300i integrated, running a pair of Revel Studios. I had been considering Mark Levinson or Krell power amps for much more money (7-10K for similar sized 2 channel power amps), but when this unit became available as a demo for $3,000 from my local dealer, I couldn't resist a home audition. The improvement from the Krell integrated was NOT subtle! The Studios sounded wonderful on the Krell, but the comparison with a power amp which provided the power they'd been thirsting for was amazing: the most noticeable change was the soundstage, which immediately gained 25-35% in both width and depth. The inner dynamics (as opposed to overall sound level) were improved dramatically, particularly on large symphonic music. With smaller, acoustic jazz recordings (particularly vocals), there is a new-found warmth with the McCormack, and better imaging of the instruments within the soundstage (when that information is available from the recording). On loud, percussive music (e.g. latin big bands, Dave Matthews Band, etc.), the Revels now sound more "relaxed" than they did with the Krell: it's hard to describe, but before you could tell that the 300i was not quite enough amp for the Revels, now they have access to the power (both quantity and quality) which they were missing before. Inner dynamics are more audible, there's more "air" around the individual horns within a big recording. I did extensive comparison of the Krell 300i vs. a Conrad-Johnson PV14 preamp (the Krell can be used as a pre-amp). I ended up choosing the C-J, but the differences here were relatively subtle, much smaller than the improvement of putting the McCormack DNA-2 into the system. I comment on that comparison on the C-J PV14 review, but for here suffice to say that the McCormack sounded great with both the Krell and the C-J, but definitely resolved the differences between them, which were largely what you would expect for an entry level Krell solid state pre-amp vs. a tube pre-amp. Similar Products Used: Krell integrated (300i) |
[Feb 11, 2000]
David
Audiophile
Strength:
tube like smoothness, tonal balance
Weakness:
reliability? I am a tube fan, I will admit it right away. I owned an ARC VT-100 and currently own Sonic Frontier Power 3 which will put most tube and solid state amps to shame. I recently sold my Sonus Faber Extrema and bought a pair of Dynaudio Confidence 5 with Esotar drivers thru out. Not a good match to my SF Power 3, so I thought I would go solid state shopping for anything less than $5k. Dynaudio Confidence 5 is very revealing on top, more than the Extrema which is one of the king in resolution. I could not stand listening to anything I borrowed from stores until the McCormack DNA-2. Almost anything had that veilness that is so typical of solid state. What happen to technology advancement in the past 10 years? Levinson is a joke, thin and dark sounding. Classe is rough sounding. Krell is "artificial" sounding, but it could fool lots of people to think it's musical. Bryston is good for rocks, but not music. BAT is a mix bag. But McCormack is very pleasant without losing details and low end. It's a standard DNA-2, not even a Deluxe or LE. While I was happy I found a good sounding solid state amp, it blew up on me after owning it for three weeks. Not the fuse, so it had to go back to McCormack for repair which took over 6 weeks total. When I had to send my ARC back for checkup, it was prompt and packed well, not with the McCormack. If they could improve on customer support, they have the best product at a real world price. Similar Products Used: Classe CA400, Levinson 333, Bryston 7B-ST, Krell FPB300, BAT VK500 |
[Aug 09, 2001]
John Stehno
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Strengths for the LAE include: refined power, fast, intertransient silence, transparency, imaging, soundstaging, focus,... (I could go on) There appear to be no compromises with this amp.
Weakness:
I wish it were the size of a cigar box. I have the DNA2 Limited Anniversary Edition (LAE). The IAR review found at the bottom of this web page states things quite accurately. Similar Products Used: Moon W-5, BAT VK-500, Polyfusion, Denon 5700 receiver |
[Jun 25, 2001]
KJM
Audiophile
Strength:
Power, detail, lush midrange, dependable, warm
Weakness:
too much bass, upper mids are grainy For the money, this amplifier is unbeatable. Lots of detail, lots of power and warmth -- a little like tube sound. Highly dependable. I matched it with an Audible Illusions Modulus 3A -- which is a little light in the bass. A very good match -- except that the grain of the 3A, coupled with the grain in the McCormack, made CDs overly brash. On LPs, the McCormack was almost perfect. Powerful enough to always sound relaxed. If source is not up to snuff, the McCormack will reveal the other components limitations. |
[Feb 03, 2001]
Bill
Audiophile
Strength:
Have never heard a better amp, period.
Weakness:
None Please be aware that there are several different versions of this amp floating around, each with its own sonic characteristics. There is the basic DNA-2, the DNA-2 Deluxe and the DNA-2 LAE (Limited Anniversary Edition). The basic DNA-2 is no longer in production. |
[Oct 09, 1999]
Jimmy
Audiophile
To RH: |
[Oct 20, 1999]
Dan Livingston
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
One of the best solid state Amps
Weakness:
none Here is the Peter Moncrieff of IAR review of the DNA-2 LAE Amp. He raves about it. Similar Products Used: Krell and Levinson Amps |