Plinius SA-100 MKII Amplifiers
Plinius SA-100 MKII Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 26, 2003]
Spencer Kong
AudioPhile
Strength:
Soundstage, power, refinemnet, tube like mid range, transistor speed and great dynamics all in one. Never too harsh after long litening. KISTEN TO BELIEVE.
Weakness:
Depends on whether there is a weak chain in your other components. I respect all other high end brands. I must say that this amp is a wonder to listen to. For the price you pay, you get double the performance. All frequencies so well tuned and produce. Get a neutral preamp and this amp will tell you teh truth in listening. Similar Products Used: Mark Levinson, Krell, Jadis, Audio Research |
[Jul 30, 2003]
Plinius
AudioPhile
Strength:
Power, refinement, good vocals, clarit, air, pace,layers of details, not harsh and always maintain that good character. When played loud, the sound remained composed, GREAT SOUNDSTAGE N SENSE OF REALITY....
Weakness:
N.A. It amp is a killer...listen to it and you will know...need not say more, go listen. I HAVE UNDERRATED IT BEFORE I OWNED ONE, THE TRUTH IS IN LISTENING. Similar Products Used: Krell 300i, Krell 100s, Mark 331, Aragon 4004Mk2, Kinergetics KBA 75. |
[Sep 26, 2002]
Mats
Audio Enthusiast
I don’t think that the mk3 has any more power compared to the mk2. The power stated in my "older" mk3 manual is also 160 W at 4 ohm. Plinius did however later come out and said that the SA100 amps really are capable of 200 W at 4 ohm. At the same time they also change one more “error” in the specifications, but I don’t remember which one. The difference between the power supply of the mk2 and the mk3 is that the mk2 uses one 800 VA transformer and the mk3 uses two 400 VA. I think they did this to reduce the mechanical humming noise that a larger transformer sometimes can produce if the supply voltage is of bad quality. The sound of the sa100 is great. Slightly warm, yet clear and detailed with good bass control and speed. |
[Jul 07, 2001]
Paul Lindemann
Audiophile
Strength:
Very transparent, fast transient response, musical.
Weakness:
Need a fork lift to move it. Great sounding amplifier! Similar Products Used: Plinius SA 50 MkIII |
[Feb 15, 2001]
Robert McAdam
Audiophile
Strength:
Clean, quick, dynamic, great bass, quiet, good looking
Weakness:
None to think of although I would like two SA250,s after hearing these. Great power amp but add another and what a sound. Sure Krell is slightly smoother but at a cost as hi-fi is, a lot more money for a small upgrade in sound quality. You can,t beat a power amp for each speaker, buy one then add another when you can afford it. I,ve heard SET amps and sure the treble is good but no bass. Ultimately it comes down to what you listen to, but if you are comtemplating home theatre these amps easily integrate with solid state receivers, and when watching good live concerts you can experience a sample off the real sound. I run two SA100,s, one channel runs the treble and one the bass, you can run then in balanced bridged which gives you about 300 watts of clean Class A power. But better value than one Krell. The secret is your loudspeakers, you must try and obtain the most efficient loudspeakers posible. Similar Products Used: Early Perreaux 2150 and 3150, had their drawbacks, mainly wouldn,t run in class A and had weak front ends, showing their age now. |
[Dec 08, 1999]
Pliniusman
Audiophile
Strength:
Superb bass, midrange, highs. Tubelike quality of presentation of the music.Warmth and transparency abound, especially when combined with the M16 preamplifier.
Weakness:
None I can think of... The previous poster obviously is not familiar with the product. Either that, or some disgruntled Krell amp owner who's kicking himself for all the extra money he has spent and still hasn't improved his performance beyond what the SA100 MkII is capable of. Similar Products Used: Aragon Palladium II's |
[Jul 29, 1999]
David Aitken
an Audiophile
After listening carefully to this component over a year, I can fully endorse all that has been said about this amplifier and the reasons it is in the Hall of Fame.It is transparent,silky,accurate,very powerful with ample headroom,excellent soundstaging and is beautifully made.I liked the switchable Class A/AB feature from day one as Pink Floyd sounds better in Class A/B to my ears compared to Maria Callas in Class A (which is superb),plus the phase switching which often adds that little extra to some difficult recordings.The other dimension which most won't know about is the complete dedication the Plinius team have to the production of their equipment - assembled by hand with stringent quality control and ultra careful in the choice of componentry - no robots but a total committment to making the best in all they do. No, I don't have an interest in the Company,so buy with confidence.Used with their M-16 preamp,run through Siltech cables into Shahinian Arc speakers - ruthless in exposing any weaknesses in components or recordings. |
[Apr 13, 1998]
Stephen Lee
an Audiophile
I first came across this product a few years ago. Back then, no one had even heard about Plinius! I had the Plinius SA-50 head-to-head with the Audio Silver Night and guess what, the Plinius beat the Silver Nights, a single-ended, Class A monoblock hands down. I traded thme in immediately. Playing with the SA-50 was somewhat like a dream come true. Clear, transparent midrange with a solid control on the bottom end. Plus, no matter how hard I drove the amp, it never fazed, even with extremely tough bass tracks. |
[Aug 05, 1998]
Greg
an Audio Enthusiast
The "Thunder from down under." That is what they should be stating about thePlinius SA100 MKII. This amp is "SMOKIN!" Seriously, though...I am just |
[Dec 06, 1998]
Joe Mendez
an Audiophile
I've owned and enjoyed a Plinius SA100 for almost two years now and canrecommend it without reservations. I recently upgraded from MKII to MKIII and |