Simaudio Celeste PW-5000 Amplifiers

Simaudio Celeste PW-5000 Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

Integrated Amplifier

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-5 of 5  
[Apr 03, 2008]
wkas
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Clarity and naturalness.
Bass.
Remote is unusually sturdy (and, BTW, will control Marantz CD players - a nice bonus!).

Weakness:

No phono (I didn't need it).
No headphone jack (an odd omission, but I hooked up a headphone amp to the tape output, which I don't use otherwise).

A terrific piece of gear. I bought this for a second system, based on my positive experience with a Simaudio P3 preamp at home, and I have not been disappointed. Built like a tank, with minimalist design (other than the volume and source, you can only alter the balance (which is all I need).

The sound, with Dali Ikon 6 speakers, is incredible - clear but with a touch of warmth, natural sounding, terrific soundstage, Seems to produce substantially better quality bass than its predecessors (an Outlaw RR2150 and a Music Hall A25.2).

I've been searching for the right integrated for the office, this seems to be it. If you see one on the used market, snap it up.

Similar Products Used:

NAD 325BEE
Oulaw RR2150
Music Hall A25.2

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 22, 2003]
Shaun
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

- Clarity (especially with teflon coated interconnects and silver plated copper). - Speed of sound. - Transients and timber which I have not heard before (perhaps this should be filed under clarity), not to mention the minute layers of detail I can now pick out. - Soundstage (it's huge compared to my very forward sounding H/K). - I especially love hearing the slow decay as I listen to songs end, cymbals fade, etc..

Weakness:

I only wish it had a pre-out to attach a sub to. But I guess I'll just have to buy better speakers. Oh well - it's a tough life. Doesn't make poor mixing and poor recordings sound particularly wonderful. It does change it though, usually for the better. Every recordings different, so it's hard to generalize.

This is a pretty sweet amp (considering I was upgrading from a H/K 730 (circa 1970's)). Had done a comparison with a rotel pre/B&K amp at the store, and I agree, the 5000 excelled in detail, transients and soundstage. Now that it's home, I look forward to listening to my collection all over again. This amp was the predecessor to the now superior i-5. As the previous poster has said, the i-5 has stabilzer feet (whereas I'm using 5 foculpods). Other differences are a transformer with a lower regulation factor (6% vs. the 5000's 10-12%), a better copper board, teflon wiring where needed to lower capacitance, Advance Renaissance feedback system which has a 10 Hz range extension over the 5000, Bipolar outputs vs. MOSFET's, a pre-out to link to a sub, and 10 watts more power at 8 ohms. It's certainly an upgrade for those that can spend that kind of coin.I'mm sure if I were to listen to it side by side there'd be slight differences, but it's all relative to the law of diminishing returns. I hear things that I've never heard before on my recordings and with an openess and speed that I'm unaccustomed to. Swapping between my Ixos bronze series Gamma Geomoetry interconnects and Ixos Silver series Gamma's, I can now hear huge differences in what these cables can do (the difference was less than stellar on my H/K). Considering I'm running it with a $400 CD player and $700 speakers, it's got me thinking about what I can do to start tweaking my system (e.g, balanced isolation transformer, changing phono cables) and buying some new equipment to see what the next jump will be. I know I've used it for less than a month, but considering I bought it used from the original dealer I certainly don't have to worry about break in so the amp sounds as godd as it's going to before I start adding other components, etc.. The bug has been planted. Yikes!!!

Similar Products Used:

Nothing really comes close.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 15, 2000]
Darren Schmidt
Audiophile

Strength:

Good power output. Integrates well into a dual purpose Home theatre/audio system. Great remote. Almost as good as the Simaudio Moon I-5.

Weakness:

None.

This amp is a great value. Among the best integrateds I have heard. It also has an input that can be set to bypass the volume control of the amplifier and use your processors volume control. This is necessary for Home Theatre. It replaced a B&K ST1400 amplifier fed by a B&K AVP3090 pre/processor. The PW-5000 kicks the heck out of the B&K stuff. It is so much better in terms of imaging, soundstaging and realism. The only difference between this amp and the Moon I-5 is the volume control (the 5000 is an earlier version of the RBG control), binding posts (expensive WBT posts), and "footers" on the chassis. I can't tell the difference in sound between them. It is rated at 60wpc. 4 overall because it may not drive some inefficient speakers that well.

Similar Products Used:

YBA Integre, Simaudio Moon I-5, Jolida tube integrated, Classe integrated (the 100watt one)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 12, 1999]
Jean Pacaud
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Very detailled sound. Good base

Weakness:

No headphone jack

I use this amplifier with the following equipement: Cambrige Audio CD4 and TDL 3SE speaker.

The sound of the unit was pretty deceiving during the first few hours of listening, but after the first nigth the sound is very clear and detailled. I listen to different style of music: Classical, Rock and Jazz.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 1-5 of 5  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com