Creek Audio 5250 Integrated Amplifiers
Creek Audio 5250 Integrated Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 13, 2000]
Mario
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
I don´t know I used the 5250 SE for about 1 jear now. Similar Products Used: YAMAHA RX.., Sony Receiver, Onkyo... |
[Dec 28, 2000]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth, correct timbre, excellent soundstaging, power.
Weakness:
None I bought the 5250SER from Audio Advisor on a close out deal for $500 off the retail list price. I am glad I did. I really needed a smooth sounding amp to go with the Triangle Titus XS speakers I just purchased, and the Creek is that, indeed. My old Luxman is very detailed and sharp sounding, so not a great match with the ultra detailed Titus'. Too much of a good thing. Now, with the Creek, with the active pre-amp removed and bi-wired into the Titus', those expressive tweeters are as sweet and detailed as I hoped they would be. Also, since the woofies are let to roll off without crossover at 6200hz, the upper mids needed a smooth amp as well. They have it now. Similar Products Used: Luxman LV-100 integrated amp |
[Jul 09, 2001]
Ron Harmon
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
I bought a 5250 after reading reviews in the Late "Fi" magazine and after Sam Tellig had mentioned it in Stereophile in a positive tone. The Creek offered what has been described as 'classic British sound," which had meant to me great resolution and clarity, but a lack of bass and dynamics. The Creek succeeded in the former, but fell quite short in the latter. Anyone who purchases the Creek 5250 should be aware that while clarity and resolution are top notch, soundstaging and dynamics leave much to be desired unless one lives in a closet.
Weakness:
The unit simply could not provide any bass or dynamics in my second system. Any purchaser should be made aware of the Creek's clean power but also its limitations: you need very sensitive speakers to get the best out of this amp. I returned it to Audio Waves for check when the switching capability went south, and had the Db switch set to 6 internally, but it still couldn't produce the kind of sound I enjoy. Listening to the unit became akin to listening to a large transistor radio, clean perhaps, resolving, certainly, but lacking in bass and dynamic excitement. For further comments, see my review of the Adcom GFP 555II that ultimately replaced the 5250 in my system, along with an NAD 2400 PE amp, which I purchased together for less than the Creek cost. Smaller British integrateds are being sold as an excellent entry level source for first time audio buyers, and I don't dispute that. But small wattage in these units generally equal a smaller sonic picture than many audio enthusiasts are wont to desire. "Postage stamp" sound is how one of my audiophile friends regarded the Creek. In the end, a disappointing experience. Be careful with reviews on these pages. I'm getting a feeling that some folks who write in declaring themselves "audiophiles" lack the judgement and discretionary powers necessary to compare different kinds of equipment. A glance at the rewiews of this product certainly makes me suspect that many people simply have no basis of comparision to adequately judge a range of componentry: just because the 5250 may sound better than the Technics receiver that they recently discarded is no reason to judge oneself an expert in sonic parameters. Similar Products Used: NAD 317, (deeper and fuller sound than the Creek.) Current system of Adcom preamp and NAD power amp |
[Jul 22, 2001]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Detail, timbre, soundstaging, and power
Weakness:
Nada This is a six month update to my previous review, circa December, 2000. I have since changed speaker wire from the Kimber 4-pr to the much more dynamic Audioquest Type4. The connectors are still Kimber PBJ w/WBT RCA's. Speakers are Triangle Titus XS on Atacama Nexus 6 stands, sand filled and I am using 3 layers of Dynamat sound deadening material between said speakers and stand plate. CD source is a Pioneer Elite PD-65, and line conditioner is a Monster Power HTS-1000. Equipment rack ia a Sanus Euro. Similar Products Used: Luxman Lv-100 |
[Feb 08, 2001]
Clarence Breskovic
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Exceptional clarity, solid performer, solid construction.
Weakness:
The manual is very brief. My equipment consists of Klipschorns, an Otari CDR-18 professional cd recorder, and a Denon DA-500 DAC. As you can see from the quote below (which I borrowed from a Klipschorn review on this site), it can be difficult to match a solid state amplifier to the Khorns: Similar Products Used: Amps in the $500 price range. |
[Oct 06, 2001]
Gene
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clean, detailed, musical, neutral sound; pre-ins and main outs; build quality; slim profile; remote
Weakness:
doesn't accept banana plugs (unless you use the binding post holes), price This does what an integrated amp is supposed to, it provides clean, detailed, musical, neutral sound. Similar Products Used: NAD T750 receiver |
[Dec 15, 2000]
Valerio Farias
Audiophile
Strength:
Terrific Soundstaging, Bass Control, Accurate Treble. Sensitive yet Punchy. Very Very Musical indeed.
Weakness:
None Yet... First of all i would like to thank Mr. Carrasco for the support at Atitude, in showing a lot of patience on my audictions. Similar Products Used: Rega ELX, Creek 4330 SE, Naim 3R. |
[Sep 21, 1999]
Gary Buck
an Audiophile
I had bought the Creek 4330 and loved the openness and overall sound quality. So when I needed more power I thought the 5250 would be a natural |
[Feb 07, 2001]
Jimbo Jones
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clean accurate sound, nice sound stage, doesn't distort or clip
Weakness:
???
|