Denon PMA-880R Integrated Amplifiers
Denon PMA-880R Integrated Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 22, 2009]
Helder Cruz
Audio Enthusiast
I bought the Denon PMA-880R as my first integrated amplifier in 1995 and I am still enjoying it. I have recently moved to a larger home and I have changed from a Pioneer PD S503 CD player into a Marantz CD5003 and kept the KEF Q50. Now I have a greater space and I realised the sound has improved. I will keep the system for years to come!
|
[Sep 12, 2009]
Jaeman
Audio Enthusiast
I got this PMA 880 R off ebay for a good price which make this Vgood amp to me . it is match up with a pare of AAD c400 speakers( bi wire ), a yamaha cdx 397 cd player and a gera planar 3 ( with motor upgrade kit & platter kit too ). the PMA 880 R on this system delivers a good will rounded sound , smooth accurate mid & high tones , deep rich bass. Yes their are better amps out there but not at the price or for my system . |
[Jan 09, 2005]
Silveray
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Ample amount of power, good build quality, soggy bass(may be bad to others)
Weakness:
None at the price I paid for this amp. I think majority of the reviewers were right to say that this amp sounded muddy. That's why one has to be careful in selecting what speakers and equipment to match with it. I feel that my Monitor Audio Monitor 2 is too bright sounding and its bass sounded lean. Hence, I decided to match them with the Denon PMA-880R after reading some of the reviews on it. I can say I'm pretty satisfied with the sound now. My Monitor Audio speakers do not sound so bright anymore. It has become more warm sounding and the lumpy bass from the amp has actually added some body to the vocals like never before! |
[Jun 16, 2003]
music224422
AudioPhile
Strength:
Excellent coherence. Very balanced and musically involving presentation.
Weakness:
Long warmup. Frequency extreme4s a bit less detailed as the best; Necessitates meticulous attention to ancillary equipment Soundstage depth poor, width non-existent!! I have noticed the extreme polarization on some of the reviews; I often attribute it to "individual tastes"; subjective qualities that are justifiably different. However, I feeled compelled ,after reading several very beneficial articles and reviews ( one of which appears above: Stanley Johnson. Well-done!!!) It is my hope to help as many music lovers as possible come closer to enjoyimg their music , and not getting caught in the neurosis of equipment chasing. While it is certainly expected to desire a new product; with all the new "bells & whistles"; It is also reasonable to expect a small hiatus from the purchase arena and time to relax, enjoy the product!!!! For many of us......This period of reflection, relaxation, and enjoyment is far too brief, it at ALL!!!!! We listen for only a period ( 2 weeks---3 months--long for MOST!!!). After this period we either: (1) Validate our choice as being extremely wise(Usually happens on VERY expensive purchases or (2) We list it FOR SALE, and start looking for something "new" all over. Unfortunately this cycle has little to do with the quality of the equipment, even less to do with music, and almost ALL to do with ego.......It has to costs more, or be bigger, or have more "fab" reviews than the one your friend "just bought". This treatise could continue; However, the point here is about my e3xperience with the Denon....EXACTLY the same as the previous reviewer. > Use the brightest,(preferably very neutral & transparent i/c's that you can find)NO expensive brands need apply!!! > Really does need adequate warm up time(approx. 1.5-2 hrs) Is it a "world beater" ? Be serious!!!! I said I wanted to help, not make you delusional!!!! (My later rating is "giant-killer; for lack of any other alternative responses) It's not going to trounce your $6K pre/power separates; However, when PROPER attention is taken for set-up and ancillary equipment, you will be a LOT closer than you think!!!!! And from a musically coherent (ie. balance) perspectiv, it will actually outperform many of your friends high end systems. Sure, the'll have their soaring highs, liquid midrange, thundering bass, etc..---------but ; You'll have your music!!!!!!! ISN"T THAT WHAT IT"S REALLY ABOUT ?????? Similar Products Used: cj pv-4 ARC SP3A-1 Mike Yee LA-1 Mac MC30's Magnepans Polk RT2000 Linn LP12 Rega planar 2 Cal Audio cdp Denon cdp Rotel cdp Transparent, Synergistics, Monster, Luminous, Apogee, and "X"(DIY |
[Apr 23, 1998]
Stanley Johnson
an Audio Enthusiast
When I first brought this amp home from the store, I was thinking "What a lemon!" Everything sounded muddy, the bass was terribly heavy, nothing like what you'd expect from a reasonably well spec'd Class A amp. The worst bit was the mid-range: totally dull and unexciting. To get sound that was even remotely listenable, you had to fool around with the bass and treble. What a load of crock, or so I thought. |
[Aug 09, 2001]
Burak BAYRAM
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
power,tight ( real ) bass, remote
Weakness:
lacks detail esp. depth... muddy mid and laid back treble, not banana accepting terminals I bought this amp used from a second hand store for $250.I auditioned it thru a Marantz CD-4000, Van Den Hul Thunderline Interconnect and ClearWater speaker cables plugged to KEF Cresta III's.Actually the sound seemed OK in the store but it did not at home. Similar Products Used: Pioneer, ONKYO, Yamaha |
[Feb 16, 1999]
Brad
a Casual Listener
I listened to this amp compared to the Rotel 970BX and without a doubt preferred the Rotel. The Denon has a boomy/muddy mid-bass and was a few $100 more, need I say more. |