Golden Tube SI-50 Integrated Amplifiers
Golden Tube SI-50 Integrated Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 19, 1998]
Tanuj Nakra
an Audio Enthusiast
After carefully listening to all sides of the argument: TUBE vs SOLID-STATE. I leaned to the side of tubes for multiple reasons: midrange perfection, and treble smoothness. Granted, there are drawbacks- the bass is a little less defined, and there is a 15 minute minimum warm-up for decent sound. |
[Jun 03, 1999]
Mark A
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought my first Golden Tube SI-50 a little over a year ago. For the price I paid the performance was very excellent. I have been using Magnaplanner speakers and a Cambridge Audio CD. Unfortuneatley, I ended up taking the power amp back to the retailer 3 times--it seems the company had been having problems with right channel failure. The retailer (Audio Dimensions in Birmingham, MI) replaced the unit each time. After the 3rd unit failed we opted for another brand (this time I went with Acuras--I know, it's not tube but it is a very good amp). |
[Jun 12, 1999]
A. OConnor
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned the GT SI-50 Mk II for about nine months and am extermely happy with it. I was looking for an amp/pre-amp combo or integrated amp with a remote for under $2000, which quickly turned into a search for an integrated. I auditioned most of the usual integrateds in this range, including the Classe CAP-100, Bryston B60, and an A/B comparison between the GT and the Krell KAV 300i, in which the tube sound of the GT made me fall in love with tubes; by comparison, the Krell sounded grainy and mechanical with more bass slam, while the GT sounded real, alive, warm, rich, and beautiful with relatively subdued bass, a great soundstage, and plenty of power for my system (50wattsX2)-- I'll take the latter any day. Once I heard the tube difference, I couldn't consider going back to solid state. I then shopped around looking for other tubed combos/integrateds with remotes and found nothing remotely close in price to the Golden Tube-- it is an incredible value (the demo I bought was $999, though I think the new ones are $1300). |
[May 10, 2001]
Sheldon
Audiophile
Strength:
Musical, rrealness, midrange, soft highs yet detailed I really enjoy the soft overtones and musically toned sound production of this amp. It remains very detailed, having a brilliant soundstage and nice depth. Because I use this in conjunction with detailed components, it seems to balance everything out. reliablitlity has not been an issue for me, and should be noted that the amp was a demo for over a year before my purchase. I definitely recomend the purchase of it, is it can be found at a resonable price second hand. One side note, although most people are not into audio equipment they will definitely appreciate the sound, but even more the aesteticcs and solidity of the remote. Similar Products Used: Acurus, arcam, bryston |
[Sep 26, 1999]
Joseph McLean
an Audio Enthusiast
After a month of product demos, I think I can safely say that no other amplifier can match the Golden Tube in this price range... in fact, up to five times the price range. Operation and design is perfection itself, and the sound is unbelievable from *any* source. I have successfully floored people playing worn-out cassettes from a $200 Sony Walkman, for pete's sake... the immediate tube distinction for me is the vocals, which are a million times more alive than solid-state. The music is INCREDIBLE. |