LINN MAJIK-IL Integrated Amplifiers
LINN MAJIK-IL Integrated Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 09, 2000]
James
Audiophile
Strength:
Well balanced sound; revealing of musical detail; good micro dynamics; natural midrange and treble; tuneful bass with good low volume impact; high end sound quality; rock solid imaging; excellent timing and beat.
Weakness:
No heavy bass impact; I don't like jumpers on high end amps. I just purchased this amp and it was intercepted by customs and then the FDA upon arrival via Airborne Express into the US. They lent me a Silver Anniversary Majik-IP to use until my IL unit arrived. Both amps sounded superb and I can't think of any difference in sound quality between the two examples separated by three years of production. My amp has the new case that has the slits across the top in immitation of their new flagship amp. It is a solidly built and attractive amp. The amp seems to be made how nature would make it if she were interested in such things; very solid and sensible with good basic proportioning. The casing is a step up from the cheap floppy casing found on most mid-fi, but it is not excessive in this regard. The circuit board looks to be of high quality even though it has such small surface mount parts. The sound quality is fine right out of the box, and I haven't noticed it change as it breaks in. I don't like the fact that the display shows two lines or "cat's eyes" rather than just shutting off when in standby mode; seems a little strange to me. The sound quality is superb and musical, though not exactly exciting in a "hi-fi" sense of the word. This is not the best loud disco amp but is superb with jazz, vocal, acoustic, electronic, Pink Floyd, and small-scale classical. The amp doesn't seem to have easily identifiable weaknesses; it is a serious high end piece of gear in my studio apartment simply because I can't push the amp hard enough to reveal any problems without annoying the neighbors. The beat is excellent and rock solid along with very stable and satisfying imaging. The mid base tuneful and solid though not heavy, so it won't bowl you over; it is not "weak bass" though. I would like to replace the jumpers with something more musically revealing, but I can't find these silver jumpers others have talked about on this forum. The amp is musically revealing, making high quality recordings come alive compared with poor quality rock recordings. Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon sounds great with this amp though, as it did with my Nait 2. Treble is smooth and revealing with no brightness. I will keep this amp for at least a decade and probably replace the jumpers with a capacitor for the Vandersteen subwoofer to go along with my vandersteen 1C's. The Rotel RCD-971 sounds great through this amp, though I percieve a need to upgrade to a Linn front end. I use Linn K-20 speaker cables and Analogue interconnects. Similar Products Used: Naim Nait 2 (1988 - awsome little amp) |
[Feb 07, 1999]
scott peterson
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased the Linn Majic on a whim during December of last year. I had owned a naim nait II and loved the sound that that gave me, even driving my Quad ESL 63s. I do not buy new gear very often because of a Divorce (uggh) and not making mega bucks as a teacher. However, I like the sound of the Majik. It tuneful, neutral and has a fairly good soundstage for the price. And inspite of its 33 wattsm does have some kick in the bottom end. And as for the REMOTE... It works extreamly well, pointing it in any direction 15 feet away from the reciever. So gee, Steve, check your batteries. |
[Oct 12, 1999]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very musical - great midrange, crisp hights, and imaging. The MM phono stage taps into the potential of my Rega Planar 3. I compared this unit with a Rega Brio. Using my existing gear, the Majik seemed more detailed and sweeter to my ears. The Brio may have sounded a little bit more rich in the bass area, but I still preferred the sound of the Majik, since to me its detail and overall sound were superior. Similar Products Used: Rega Brio, NAD 317 |
[Jul 10, 2001]
Matthew Weems
Audiophile
Strength:
Everything. Purely a musical amp. Spacial cues and bass are most noticable, but everything is incredible. Looks sharp too.
Weakness:
Possibly simplicity. For the gadget freaks who are more into how many buttons there are, and how many neon lights are displayed this piece will bore you. Do not be fooled by this integrated being only 33wpc. It will play louder and more mucically than any 100wpc receiver and most +2K seperate components. It is Stereophile Class B rated, I understand why now. It is the cheapest (pricewise) Class B component on the list. Amplification can make as much of a difference in sound as your cd player or speakers. Nuff said. I feel like such a dummy for the rave reviews I gave on other equipment. This is the next level here! Similar Products Used: Luxman, Other Linns', Yamaha |
[Nov 15, 1999]
Dragan
Audio Enthusiast
P.S. ...replaced "jumpers" with silver "Kimber" cables and |
[Jun 14, 1999]
John
an Audio Enthusiast
I originally purchased the Linn Majik as an afterthought to my first high end system, which consisted of a Denon DCM-460 CD changer, Parasound HCA-1500A amp, and "home brew" bookshelf speakers produced by a small local manufacturer/retailer. Preamp duties were handled by a Creek OBH-12 passive preamp. (This system replaced an earlier receiver-based "mid-fi" setup.) |
[Nov 15, 2001]
Roland
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clear sound / small/ design / made in high quality/ you can listen a long time/ Majik is easy to sell, because people know the name and the product
Weakness:
to expensive I had a Majik for a few years and listened witz: |
[Sep 11, 2001]
Prakit Premthamkorn
Audiophile
Strength:
Remote control, compactness, good power rating for its size. As other Linn products, this is a very well design and engineered piece of equipment.
Weakness:
The tonal balance is rather thin and dry. Not very involving sound. I have been using this as a secondary system at my bedroom. It feeds it with Magnum Dyna Lab Etude tuner, and tubed Cal DAC (Rotel RCD655 as a transport) for more than 3 year now. The speakers are B&W CDM 1. Orginally, this amp sounded ok but not great. I though about selling it many times but I enjoyed the convenience of the remote control and it's compact size enough. So, I kept it. Similar Products Used: Audio Innovations 300II, Cyrus IIIi |
[Mar 09, 1998]
Andy Scott
an Audio Enthusiast
LINN MAJIK |
[Jun 04, 1998]
Steve
an Audiophile
All I can say about the MAJIK is that I was a little bit let down. My Linn dealor had a 100% trade in policy for Linn products and was constantly goading me to trade in my Intek and two Powerteks for a new Majik and two LK-100's. After the trade in I found that the Majik did not sound as good as the Intek, and that the LK-100's kept shutting down at high levels with my Keileidhs. |