Plinius 8150i Integrated Amplifiers
Plinius 8150i Integrated Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 25, 2017]
Ray Hunter
Audio Enthusiast
I bought the 8150 second hand in 2013 from someone who had upgraded to a Perreaux Audiant (I live in NZ). But in their opinion there was no discernible sound quality difference between the two, they just wanted the digital input features of the Perreaux.
|
[Jun 29, 2004]
harryjmic
AudioPhile
Strength:
More resolution than old amp, super clear sound but not fatiging, Plenty of power, excellent build quality, I have no complaints.
Weakness:
It came to me damaged, not the amps fault. I purchased this amp used from Audiogon after reviewing many amplifiers on line. I wanted to stay with an integrated amp for now and the Plinius seemed to be the best for me. This Plinius is an upgrade from my previous amp an Audio Refinement Complete. The Audio Refinement is an excellent amp for the money and I was very happy with it; I just got the upgrade bug. I live in a condo so at this time I would say the Plinius has more than enough power to drive my Vienna Acoustic Mozart speakers. The first thing which struck me about the Plinius is how good it sounds at low, low volumes. The clarity is amazing, and the detail and separation of the instruments makes listening to familiar cd's a revelation. I did notice one peculiar but nice acoustical phenomona right away. When you are seated and listening to music the volume seems very loud, but when you stand up and walk a short distance away you realize it wasn't that loud. I don't know how to explain it other than the sound is so full and rich that maybe my ears perceive it as being loud? This is the first time I have ever experienced this phenomona. A couple things about the amp, it came to me used and when I first hooked it up one channel was out. I had the sender make a claim with UPS. I then sent the amp for repairs to Advanced Audio the Plinius state side repair facility. Vince did an excellent job of repairing the damage and leaving the amp stock with no upgrades to make it an 8200 model. There was some circuit board damage to the phono section because a previous owner operated this amp with the ground loop disconnected. This can send DC through the ciruit board and what will happen is the DC will burn up the copper traces on the board. So if you have an amp with a noisy phono section this is might be what is wrong with the amp. The pre-amp needed repair as well. Is UPS capable of this kind of damage, I wonder? From what I understand the 8150 is the most coveted model of the series and actually has a higher resale value than the 8200's. I have had the amp less than a week and I am sure it will sound better once a couple of the new transistors are broken in. I leave it on all the time and since it's inside a cabinet with a door I purchased a small fan to keep it cool. The construction is solid with high quality components throughout. In the past, I always kind of dismissed more expensive amplifiers believing them to be a waste of money. Boy was I wrong, this Plinius is several orders of magnitude superior to the Audio Refinement and the Audio Refinement is pretty nice. I think I now have an amp I can keep for a long, long, time. Similar Products Used: Nothing similar, this was an upgrade. I have heard a lot of different amps but not in my system so comparisons would be unfair. |
[Mar 15, 2002]
ttrulis510
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wonderful sound, built like the proverbial tank.
Weakness:
I have read some unfair criticisms that it is all guts and no finesse. This is absolutely not true. Very pleased with the overall sound of the amp. Full bodied without being bloated. Very natural. Never harsh, but very revealing. Great impact and speed. Beautiful to look at and operate. Has a the guts of a big amp but does not lack the finesse, either. This amp is for anyone who wants to simplify their system, but not at the expense of the music. While it is not cheap, it beats the pants off of several other integrateds in the price range. It ain''t tubes, but it does not have a harsh transistor , or fuzzy mos-fet sound either. What it does have is a true "rightness" to the sound. Similar Products Used: I replaced the ECI3 (Electrocompaniet) same price range. Do not spend your hard earned dough on anything in the $1,500-$2,000 price range without hearing this first! |
[Feb 15, 2000]
Garrett
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth, sweet, full sound. Adds no character to the music. Very well made.
Weakness:
None I love this amp! The touch, feel, sound, remote, all scream QUALITY! Similar Products Used: Acurus, Sony ES, Rotel, Arcam, Jolida |
[Feb 17, 2000]
Sean Hussey
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Classy looks and solid, sophisticated sound. Great with all female vocals, classical, americana, jazz.
Weakness:
Long warm-up; must be kept on all the time. No remote source selector, if that matters. Listened to many different amps including: Arcam 9/9P, marantz PM-17, Kora, Classe 151, VAC Avatar, Krell, Mark Levinson. Plinius has proven to be the most refined for the money. Solid looks and sound that will please with the right set-up and material. It is neutral but still sweet to the ear. I have very revealing speakers that might seem bright in other systems, but here sounds so open and truly dynamic. Only beat by the Vac Avatar, a true jewel for tube gear. I like that lush sound, personally. Plinius is cleaner in comparison and faster but not as full and airy. Forget the Krell; it sounds distorted and unnatural. I have found several speakers to match this amp including Joseph Audio RM-7 Sig and my own Dynaudio 1.3 mkII. With the Arcam 9 it is a most pleasing first system for me and plays most anything well. Absolutely must upgrade the stock powercord. I am now shopping for a decent turntable; although with my cheap JVC it sounds almost entrancing! (believe it or not) The phono stage is supposedly stupendous and I know I will love it once set-up properly. For now, I sit and listen to Lucinda Williams and John Coltrane in my living room. Similar Products Used: None (my first system!) |
[Mar 22, 2000]
Fred
Audiophile
Strength:
smooth, detailed, very good imaging, very listenable for extended periods
Weakness:
long warm up period well, i've used the Plinius for about 4 months now, fully broken in. Its been a great amp. I had a Mark Levinson ML3 and a Gryphon Dual Mono-Preamp on audition for a few weeks mated to a Dynaudio Contour 1.1. I did enjoy this set-up, however when I went back to the Plinius, I still preferred the sound of my Plinius. I think these amp are a perfect match w/ any of the Dynaudio speakers. I had the same amp used on the Audience 40 (earlier report) and again, it sounded great with those speakers. Mated to a friend's Totem, still sounded very good. Similar Products Used: Mark Levinson, Gryphon Pre-amp |
[Jun 20, 2000]
David Burgess
Casual Listener
Strength:
Effortless and listenable at high volumes. Great poise.
Weakness:
Nothing material. This was an upgrade from an ancient NAD 3020. I did not do extensive comparisons - all I can say is that, as a non-audiophile, I am totally thrilled with this amp. |
[Jan 05, 2001]
Nick Martin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very natural, open, free of grain, reliable, with plenty in reserve.
Weakness:
On-board Phono stage is decent, but far from show-stopping. Natural and open, trumps anything I've heard at the price. Quite simply, it's the first amp I have used where you can just concentrate on the music and enjoy the quasi-concert hall experience. Similar Products Used: Musical Fidelity, Sugden, Arcam. |
[Jan 15, 2002]
ben garland
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound,price,build
Weakness:
none below is the review on my 8200 i also own a 8150 and i muust say i like the 8150 better as it has a warmer sound and actually better slam in the low end,therefore i am revising my scores on the 8150,this review is on the plinius 8200 (not a upgrades 8150i but a new 8200) the unit looks like the 8150 .actually sounds like a 8150 but does it perform like the 8150 or is it better?it does cost more and yes it does have more watts but is it better? well i owned a 8150 and a 8200 i sold the 8200 a few months ago, it is a great amp ,and it performs flawlessly while i owned it the bass was like my 8150 (quiet a slam) the highs were excellent ,i would recommend the 8200 to anybody i found the performance way above the dollar spent ,but for some reason it did not have the same tonal response as the 8150. i was told that plinius did not use the same parts in the power supply as used in the 8150,if this is true then i guess that would explain the sound differences,but let me say no matter which amp you choose the 8150 or the 8200 you will be more than happy as both sounded great,and both have enough power to drive any speaker,and both beat the pants off the krell,and other integrated amps of the $3000-$4000 price range Similar Products Used: krell,mac,vtl,cj,you name it |
[Aug 11, 2000]
Torfinn Austraatt
Audiophile
Strength:
Good allround. Here you get a good allround unit, but do not expect that it just as good as the best seperates. It has a lot of power, but you hear that it's not a 250W poweramp. The resolution is good , but not superb. The riaa is ok, but not up there with the best in resolution. I found that it did not worked well with my 0.4mV Transfiguration Spirit when it was set to mc, but if I use A mc-transformer and use it as a mm-riaa it is pretty good but not suberb in resolution. As for the poweramp I would say that it is as good as a SA100 running in class AB. As for the soundstage it still good, but not suberb. The big plusses is that you don't need any expensive cables and you get a very good idea on what high-end is about. |