Sugden A-48 Integrated Amplifiers

Sugden A-48 Integrated Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

Integrated Amplifier (1977-1981)

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-9 of 9  
[May 03, 2003]
energyandair
AudioPhile

Strength:

Great sound, great value, simple, should last a long time

Weakness:

No remote (if you care), A48B may not drive awkward loads

About 3 years ago, I bought a second hand Sugden A28B from a local audiophile who had become more interested in vintage tube amps. Compared to the Rotel 931AX, it replaced, it was a big step up. It gave more detail along with the smoothest mid and upper range on CDs that I have heard other than in high end Audio Note tube amps. Is it perfect? No such thing once the audio bug bites! Much as I like the amp, I have been looking for something that would give more authoritative bass with my Mission 753 speakers and kinder treatment of less than perfect LPs without giving up that beautiful midrange. When I had the opportunity to try an A48B I jumped at it. Appearance Externally the A28B and the A48B amps looked almost identical ie. Like a black version of the photo above but without the vents in the top that lead me to believe that the amp in the photo is actually the pure Class A Sugden A21A. The older A48 series 1 and 2 look quite different. See http://www.audiosynergy.co.uk/old_sugden.htm Construction Both amps appear well constructed with good components but share no circuit boards in common. The A28B has the same preamp and phono boards as the A21A. The A48B has the same preamp and phono boards as the A25B that preceded the A28B. Operation The A28B runs noticeably warmer than the A48B. This suggests that the 44W A28B runs with a higher bias current and may be thought of as something in between the pure Class A 25W A21A and the 60-70W class A/B A48B. Controls are the same except that the A48B has a click stop volume control and the on light is integrated into the switch button. Sound Both amps sounded very good but there are noticeable differences. On CDs, the mid and upper range of the A48B was very good but the A28B was superb. The bass on the A28B is decent but the A48B had stronger dynamics and better control. On phono the A28B had great detail but the A48B was much more forgiving of less than perfect records and my Shure M97XE cartridge. Compatibility The A48B had no problems with my speakers but I understand it is not good with very low impedances or capacitative loads. The A28B seems to be much more tolerant and sounded significantly better than a Quad 33/303 pair when driving Quad ESL 57s. It is also worth noting that the A28B is more forgiving of old CD players than any other amp I have heard. The A28B has internal jumpers to accommodate moving coil cartridges but I am not sure if the A48B has this capability. Problems The only problem I have had was a hum when first connecting the tuner and TV. This was a ground loop between the incoming cable and the earth in the amplifier’s 3 wire power lead. Installation of a Ground Breaker in the cable cured the problem. Upgrades I am in no great rush to change the A28B but I will upgrade the CD player when I see a chance for a big upgrade at a good price. I am also considering getting a better phono cartridge as I suspect that the amp is geared to better cartridges and is revealing the limits of the M97XE. Which should you get? The short answer is whichever you can. They are both very good, are hard to find and are real bargains. In my case, I preferred the A28B for its gorgeous midrange on CDs but I generally play at low volume and while I play a range of things, my tastes primarily run to Dianna Krall, Eva Cassidy and Chopin. If you want more volume, strong bass and play lots of LPs of varying condition or have very inefficient speakers, you may be happier with the A48B unless your speakers are awkward to drive. Other Equipment Turntable: Linn Basik with Shure M97XE CD Player: Sony 620ES Speakers: Mission 753s and Fulton Minis

Similar Products Used:

Rotel 931AX, Quad 33/303, NAD 3020, Linn Pretek/PowerTek, Linn Classik, Rega Brio plus numerous others in dealers sound rooms

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 11, 2003]
RGA
AudioPhile

Strength:

Very musical amplifier blending solid state impact with the right touch of valve musicality. Phenomenal at this price. Hand built, Class A, solid.

Weakness:

Not a huge soundstage, Aesthetically plain, not equiped for difficult impedence speakers - no tough electrostatic speakers.

While shopping for a power amplifier and a phono amp I came across a used Sugden A48B Circa 1992-1997. I remembered that UHF magazine was a fan of Sugden so I thought I would give it a try...since it had a phono board and a low price. The List price of this Sugden is $1995.00(with phono board). I had the unit connected up to a Paradigm Studio 100V2 and directly compared the SUgden against the more than $3000.00 Musical Fidelity A300 Integrated. The Sugden A48B produced a more musical sound. Indeed, the sound is very reminiscent of very good valve amplifiers but with very solid deep bass response. The A25a from Sugden is the company's best integrated but the A48B offers a softer presentation which can help tame bright cd players and speakers. I also have an Arcam Delta 290 integrated(Class B Stereophile recommended in 96) and quite frankly as good as it is it is outclassed in virtually every respect by the A48B...running in class A, DC, must be worth something. The 55-60 watts of the Sugden will be plenty for almost all speakers and offers tremendous depth(though not particularly wide) staging and very solid control of the bottom end. No frequency limiting circuitry in the Sugden allows a speaker to go deep. For the $425.00 CDN I paid I seriously doubt I could have done better...I have compared it to several newer far far more costlier amps from MF, Bryston, Arcam, NuVista, Krell, Levinson, Classe, Cary among others. I can say the Sugden is not embarrassed by this company...the Sugden does not win out in the technical areas of soundstaging(pin pointing instruments in their proper place) and the Sugden is not going to drive very difficult loads...but in the mid band and with female vocals it's in the league of mega buck amps...it has a high frequency range that mixesa nice balance of extension and smoothness...again not being embarrassed by other costlier amps...and bass response is rich and deep...with easier speakers you would not want for more. Sugden is one of the lesser known names in the high end world...which is a shame. Lucky us for discovering them...and if you're reading this...then you may be lucky too.

Similar Products Used:

MF A300, Arcam Delta 290 and Alpha 10, Bryston 3b/BP25, Classe Ca150, ASL AQ1003DT, and tubes from Cary and NuVista, SS from Krell, Levinson, Creek, NAD, Roksan,Cambridge Audio, Denon, etc.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 12, 2002]
geraldellr
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

the sound.

Weakness:

the combined volume & on/off switch. don''t use this switch to turn it off - just unplug it from the mains, then there is nothing wrong with the volume control at all.

i bought this amp new in 1976 & have had no reason to change it. turntables, arms, cartridges, tuners, cd players and especially loudspeakers have all come & gone but the a48 stays.it does every thing i ask of it, with great finesse. sure its not perfect but its not far off (unless you have a fortune to spend of course).

Similar Products Used:

none

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 12, 2002]
Mark Tokarski
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Stress free very reliable- like a VW Beetle. Cheap to buy used, a "sound" investment.

Weakness:

The volume knob tends to crackle if not used reqularly, Its a heavy machine to carry The top tends to mark easy

I have the orange mark 1 amplifier. I bought as soon as I saw it-because it was such a familar sight(My father still has his from 1978). It has a fantastic warm sound. It can "push" anything- I currently use it with some Monitor Audio speakers. My father has used it with some Tannoy Dual concentrics and now some super efficient Acustic Energy- the sound is equally impressive.

Similar Products Used:

N.A

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 08, 2002]
Matthew D
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Great midrange and easy to live with sound. Do not partner with bright speakers or source. A bargain second hand buy. £70-100 if you can find one!

Weakness:

Looks although retro fans may love it. Too many controls.

This amp is the mark 2 version from the early eighties with a brown facade. More powerful(60 watts) than its than its orange mark 1 cousin with a more refined and controlled delivery. Great for acoustic and midrangey music although can be a little bright at times.

Similar Products Used:

Arcam alpha 8. Used Cyrusii for many years.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 06, 2002]
MattD
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Great musicality with delivered without harshness.

Weakness:

Appearance and controls although many retro buffs love the appearance.

This is an A48 mark ii, early eighties. Superior to its orange mark i relative, having a weightier and more consistent performance. Great midrange, fantastic with acoustics and voices. Keep returning to this amp after trying many other amps. A bargain at £70!

Similar Products Used:

A48 mark i

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Dec 26, 2001]
Maarten Appel
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

incredible Bass and treble control, very smooth sound, weight :), and lots of functions

Weakness:

Very hard to ajust volume

My type differs from the image shown, I have a model from 74. wich won a prize for design!

This is a pure class-A integrated amplifier, with more functions than most moders amps.

I owned this amp for whole my life now, and it still works great. It has a good sterio image, and it gives a wooly sound. It doesn't matter how loud you put it, as long as your speakers can handle it, it's beautifol!

A weakness is that you HAVE to listen loud, because the volume is hard to ajust.

If anyone would like an image of this older model, plz mail me!

greetz

Similar Products Used:

Quad 303

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 22, 2000]
Colin McGarry
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Smooth, powerful, easy to listen through.

Weakness:

Looks? Dodgy Volume pot. Too many filters but probably useful for crummy sources.

What an amp! 22 years old and still going strong. I have 'replaced' it twice and ended up returning to it each time.
Currently used with a Sondek and a pair of Castles. Lovely sound, easy on the ears yet detailed and quite punchy.
If you can find one I would give it a firm recommendation. A friend has one of a similar vintage and it also is still the first choice amp.
Build quality is quite incredible, nobody makes product this way at anywhere near the price. (Cost in 1978 was £225, ~$350)

Similar Products Used:

Cambridge Audio A4

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 01, 2000]
Edgar
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

balanced, punchy sound. very crisp, good phono stage, pre-outs and headphone socket,

Weakness:

could be sweeter, no remote

Class A/AB, runs hot, dual mono integrated, manufactured in 1991, A48markiii, about 150pounds in VGC, A refined and balanced sound, extended bass, good transparency and soundstage. Excellent value for money if you can find one...even better if you replace the power caps!!Classical and acoustic sounds fantastic, rated at about 70 watts per channel, 8 ohm, lacks a little warmth for voices and horns but superior sound for price.

Similar Products Used:

nad, nakamichi

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-9 of 9  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com