Adcom GFP-750 Preamplifiers
Adcom GFP-750 Preamplifiers
[Mar 26, 2001]
Brian Dautch
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound, sound, sound.
Weakness:
Build quality a little shaky...my source dial only turns to the right (of course, you can change inputs with the remote). Listen, I don't want to bother you with a bunch of comments that have already been made about the GFP-750. I only have one worthwhile thing to add: Get rid of the supplied lamp-quality power cord and get yourself into something like a Harmonic Technology AC-11 ($180 for 2 meters normally, or $162 from Craig at getpods@aol.com). Not that this is the only worthwhile power cord in it's price class; doubtless, there are many others. The point is, the sheer clarity of your GFP-750 will GO THROUGH THE ROOF when you replace the standard power cord with a decent aftermarket version. Midrange now sounds incredible, bass hits with more slam AND precision, and the high end enjoyed similar improvements. I'm talking about obvious, instantaneous enhancements. Seriously, if you can afford a little financial hit, you should really get rid of that lamp cord Adcom gives you and upgrade. I promise you, as someone with personal experience with the GFP-750, that it will definitely be worth it. Similar Products Used: None |
[Mar 26, 2001]
Brian Dautch
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound, sound, sound.
Weakness:
Build quality a little shaky...my source dial only turns to the right (of course, you can change inputs with the remote). Listen, I don't want to bother you with a bunch of comments that have already been made about the GFP-750. I only have one worthwhile thing to add: Get rid of the supplied lamp-quality power cord and get yourself into something like a Harmonic Technology AC-11 ($180 for 2 meters normally, or $162 from Craig at getpods@aol.com). Not that this is the only worthwhile power cord in it's price class; doubtless, there are many others. The point is, the sheer clarity of your GFP-750 will GO THROUGH THE ROOF when you replace the standard power cord with a decent aftermarket version. Midrange now sounds incredible, bass hits with more slam AND precision, and the high end enjoyed similar improvements. I'm talking about obvious, instantaneous enhancements. Seriously, if you can afford a little financial hit, you should really get rid of that lamp cord Adcom gives you and upgrade. I promise you, as someone with personal experience with the GFP-750, that it will definitely be worth it. Similar Products Used: None |
[Aug 17, 2000]
Andre
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Completely transparent, well built, bargain for the price
Weakness:
None for the price I've had my 750 preamp for a couple months now. It sounds simply amazing. If you think it sounds bad, I am sorry to say that the problem is not the preamp, but your other components. The 750 is pretty revealing and will let you know exactly how your system sounds. |
[May 28, 2000]
Ronald Hockett
Audiophile
Strength:
Clean, open midrange, extended highs, extremly neutral, good bass definition.
Weakness:
Quality Excellent sounding unit, if you can tolerate the quality. Make sure that Adcom has gotten over all Q.C. woes before you drop $1250 on this one. My 1st unit just wouldn't turn on any longer (died) after a couple of months. However, since the unit sounded so good, I returned it for an exchange. The 2nd unit did not send a stereo signal to my amplifier (mono only). I give up and am now looking to return this one and exchange it for a Sunfire Tube Preamp or a Bryston BP-20 Preamp. Similar Products Used: None |
[Sep 23, 1999]
Dedrick Streit
an Audiophile
I bought this 13 months ago, and it has been very reliable. I must have gotten mine before they had all the QC problems. This preamp is incredibly neutral, and operation is smooth and simple. I like the elegant simplicity of the face plate and the high quality feel of the controls.Before warming up, passive mode (HURRAY ADCOM!) is slightly smoother than active. But, after about a half hour, there is very little difference. Looks to me like Adcom has come very close to achieving that "piece of wire - with gain" quality - AND at a very affordable price. (I am very young for an audio enthusiast. Therefore, also quite poor. After buying my dealer's demo version of the 5802, I went back several days in a row looking for a preamp that I could afford. I was fixing to buy the bottom of the line Rotel, when my dealer took pity on me and sold me this unit - brand new - at his cost!!!!!!! This was the best experience I have had buying anything, and I will drive the 180 miles out of my way - as I have now moved - to buy all my audio gear from him!) |
[Mar 09, 2001]
ccmman
Audiophile
Strength:
world-class transparency, dynamics, tonality and soundstaging; silent background; HT throughput; passive option; balanced inputs/outputs; ridiculously cheap
Weakness:
annoyingly bright LED indicators Once again we have a case of a truly world-class product panned for the wrong reasons. This preamp is startlingly transparent, meaning it's just gonna show how bad the associated gear is. Stereophile has this product as a *Class A* component (see full review in their online archives) even though it costs a mere fraction of its competition--and it's true competitors really are the megabuck preamps. This preamp is about as close to sounding like nothing that I've heard, especially in passive mode (if your assoicated components have properly matched gain and impedance). It doesn't sound like tubes, neither does it add any solid state colorations. It just sounds like nothing...meaning your source and amp had better be top-notch. The bad reviews here are reflecting that. This piece could grace multi-kilobuck systems with no problem. Similar Products Used: Bryston BP-25; Rouge Audio 99; VTL 2.5 |
[Dec 27, 1999]
Frank Steele
Audiophile
Strength:
Very VERY neutral, excellent soundstage
Weakness:
none. This David character obviously has a hidden agenda, he has trashed several other Adcom pieces of equipment here. Similar Products Used: Bryston BP-20 |
[Oct 19, 1999]
Brett
Audio Enthusiast
This is terriffic product. When I see a review such as Dave's below, I understand why people complained in the Absolute Sound about novice reviews on the internet. I mean, give me a break! |
[Mar 01, 1999]
Christopher Bowland
an Audiophile
This preamp offers superb performance and is an outstanding value. The Adcom replaced a McCormack Micro Line Drive in my system, which I used in passive mode for about 2 years. I was very happy with the performance and quality of the McCormack, but it lacked remote control and the dual volume control made setting the balance for optimum soundstaging very inconvenient. I became really interested in the Adcom after reading Wes Phillips' rave review in the March 99 Stereophile. |
[Mar 04, 1999]
Ivanj
an Audio Enthusiast
I would burnin this preamp on a few days and then listen to it critically. I would also favor it with the best cables. |