Apt Holman Preamplifier Preamplifiers
Apt Holman Preamplifier Preamplifiers
[Jul 10, 2003]
shawk
AudioPhile
Strength:
Design. Phono section. Oveall sound. Current low used price. Flexibility. Great manual.
Weakness:
Some components at the end of their service life. The caps and resistors get noisy and go out of tolerance. The muting relay gets intermittent. Very good unit. A classic. Any Apt preamp or amp will probably need to be rebuilt, as the caps and resistors will be noisy and out of tolerance. Most of the poor reviews are likely to be the result of out of tolerance caps and resistors. Upgrading the quality of these components during the rebuild will result in a significant improvement. Once overhauled, the preamp and amp are the sonic equivalent of much more expensive equipment. Many sellers assume that the poor sound is the result of poor design. Therefore, you can find these units cheaply. If you budget $250 per piece to overhaul and update them, you can have the equivalent of a $4,500 preamp and amp for about $850. Similar Products Used: Krell, Levinson, Quad, Marantz |
[Sep 06, 2002]
wmjaeger
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great mechanicals--switches and all that.
Weakness:
Sonically weak. I'll go with some of the other remarks that this unit sounds dry and restrained. How can that be? Square waves look good through it yet the sound is affected? My previous Hafler and Dynaco units both sounded better, thought they didn't look as nice. Similar Products Used: See above. |
[Feb 23, 2002]
Bob
AudioPhile
Strength:
warm, intimate sound phono section control flexibilty excellent construction spartan look
Weakness:
no longer made spartan look This is one of the most musical preamps available for under $3000. It has been the control center of my music system for over twenty years, and it still retains the focused soundstage and warm intimate sound that it had from the first day I listened to it. I like the action of the volume control, the laser-trimmed resistors maintain the proper left-right balance throughout the entire volume range, right down to the lowest volume. The first 180 degrees of the volume control are a slow ramp-up of the volume, very suitable for headphone listening via the much better than norm phones output. A previous reviewer misread this feature of the volume control, citing the need to turn the control up too high in order to get the appropriate volume. Even at one o''clock, there is plenty of room to go in the range of the volume control. Unlike Spinal Tap, there is no need to go up to "11" on this volume control. The switching flexibility is absolutely amazing, with all tape and external processor inputs and outputs fully buffered. The tone controls have a subtlety that is most welcome in this day of +/- 12dB adjustments. Two phono inputs! One for my 78rpm turntable, and one for my regular vinyl. Life is good. And this preamp is excellent. Similar Products Used: Dynaco Mark Levinson Krell |
[Jan 20, 2000]
Alfred Cocchini
Audiophile
Strength:
See everything below
Weakness:
None A superb pre-amp. Simply stunning performance. I solve the power switch problem by simply leaving the unit on: sound best this way, anyway. I got my copy from Saturday Audio Exchange for $169 (!!!). |
[Apr 20, 2000]
Jamie
Audiophile
Strength:
Very clean, neutral, and balanced. Many useful features. Useful and useable tone controls that enhance rather than detract
Weakness:
Relay contacts get dirty, and some transistor hiss becomes audible as the preamp ages. To be brief, This preamp was made in 1979. I point this out because this stupid revue form required me to pick a model year date that was in the last 5 years. It is a very refined design. Although a complete tube-head, I still use this entirely transisitorized piece of equipment as my main preamplifier. It has a neutral, un-colored quality to the sound that is hard to find in any preamp, much less an inexspensive solid state design. The tone controls are very well designed and are actually useable. One can add a little bass, or roll a little treble, and unlike virtually every other preamp I've tried, it doesn't hurt the overall tone quality. Users of planar speakers (especially smaller Magnepans) will find that one of the bass boost contours matches the rolled-off bass of the planar designs so well that boosting the bass around 6 db causes a remarkably flat response from a well set up planar speaker system. |
[Mar 31, 2000]
John s
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
In its stock form, the apt pre is decent sounding. You will have to spend quite a bit more to better. The phono stage is one of the best available, and is extremel flexible for either moving coil or moving magnet cartridges. There are plenty of inputs, including two tape recorder loops, and an external processor loop, which can be used as a third tape loop.
Weakness:
Parts quality has improved over the years, since Tom Holman first designed this piece. Simple replacement of the 21 .01uf ceramic caps with film caps, and replacing the carbon shunt resistors with 1% metal film pieces, will allow this piece to compete with pre amps in the 1500.00 range and above. Bang for the buck, this unit is a steal. It combines ultra reliability, with good sonics, in a very user friendly package. Similar Products Used: The matching power amp is worth looking into as well. |
[Mar 26, 2000]
Ed Slocomb
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Phone section, stereo "mode" control, useful bass and treble controls, overall quality.
Weakness:
Muting switch. Because of its age, the AC outlets in the back are not polarized. This unit was made in 1979. Similar Products Used: Hafler, SAE, Carver preamps. |
[Jan 15, 2000]
ronald hoffman
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
I have use this preamp for over ten years, and I bought it used. Never had a problem and when I added a Classe amp and Dalquist speakers and polk sub I can get a completely satisfing sound. I was thinkind that it was time to upgrade but after reading the other reviews, WHY. Happy I bought this one. |
[May 17, 2000]
Aaron
Audiophile
I used and enjoyed the Apt Holman preamplifier along with the Apt 1 power amplifier since they were first made in 1979. Together, the units are quite musical and enormously pleasant to listen to. The phono section of the preamp deserves its reputation. Truth be know, however, technology has progressed and a number of today's entry-level high end systems will surpass the Apt equipment. As my equipment aged, the preamp developed a pronounced hiss, which at least one other reviewer has noted, and both pieces required servicing around the time they turned 20. I recently (and not without some misgivings) replaced my Apt gear with Meridian's integrated amp. While the Apt phono section stacks up well against the Meridian, the Meridian is, to my ears, clearly superior in a side-by-side comparison. Still, for the money, a well-maintained Holman preamp is difficult to beat. |
[Feb 01, 2001]
Jeff Peace
Audiophile
Strength:
Phono section, R+L to R-L control, Lots of switching
Weakness:
Ugly faceplate, needs to be 19" rack width (a 19" faceplate was available) There's not a whole lot I can add to the previous reviews of this wonderful little pre-amp. I picked it up about 5 years ago as a curiosity at a used hi-fi store. The original manual and marketing literature were laying on top of it. I glanced through these and thought it sounded like an interesting little toy. It was (and still is) in mint condition and the guy sold it to me for $100. I took it home and put it up on the test bench only to discover that its frequecy response had deteriorated from 20kHz down to 18 kHz. I cleaned all of the switches and pots, and replaced all of the caps. It was now ready for a listen! After using it for about a month I parted with my other pre-amps because I knew I would never need them again. Similar Products Used: McIntosh, Halfler, B&K, Audio Research, Krell |