Balanced Audio Technology VK-5i Preamplifiers
Balanced Audio Technology VK-5i Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[May 10, 2006]
bappy
AudioPhile
Strength:
Huge soundstage, beautifull extended deep bass. Wonderfull resolution. Very close to the music.
Weakness:
No Remote. I was using Krell Ksl 2 before buying VK 5 & I was happy. But after listening BAT, now I think I was not perfect in this audio world & now I am.
Similar Products Used: VK 50SE. Ref3, SLP 05, CAT Sig 1, Sonic Frontiur SFL1 etc. |
[Jul 03, 2002]
javry
AudioPhile
Strength:
warmness without lushness....strong midrange...and incredible detail in all registers.
Weakness:
Pure balanced topology. RCA users will have to get a set of adaptors. Victor sells a high quality pair for $90. This is obviously not really a weakness but RCA users should be aware that it's an issue before purchasing. Excellent product. Victor and Steve sure know what they're doing. I was using a Krell KBL prior to ordering the VK-5i. The KBL obviuosly had strenghts, particularly in the base region but it didn't have the roundness and elegance in the upper register that typically only comes with tube gear. I had that magic once before with a Luxman CL-32 and wanted to experience it again. So I coughed it up for the BAT....and wow! I'm loving every moment of owning this piece. Similar Products Used: BAT VK50SE and other BAT products. CAT products also come very close. |
[Feb 08, 2002]
Tebecker
AudioPhile
Strength:
This Pre-amp is Legendary. Open, Rich, Transparent,and Detailed sound. Still One of the Best Pre-amps out there. VK-5i is Very Well Built
Weakness:
None that I know of I bought my BAT VK-5i from a gentleman through Audiogon. I always wanted to try Tubes and I heard Great things about BAT Products. I could go on and on about this Product but its nothing short of Outstanding. Its completely changed the way I listen to Music! Very open, transparent, warm sound that Tubes are known for. Great Product and Great Company. Optional Remote : the Best I''ve ever seen/used. My system : Electrocompaniet EMC-1 2 Classe'' CA-201 (as monoblocks) Avalon Acoustic Arcus Velodyne Subwoofer All Synergistic Research: Resolution Reference BALANCED Interconnects (Active shielding), Speaker Cables, and Power Cords Chang LightSpeed 9600 Line Conditioner Similar Products Used: Too numerous to list |
[Dec 05, 1997]
Rollin
an Audiophile
After reading Mr. Davis' comments, I couldn't help but add the following note. If you own the BAT VK-5i and are happy with it, don't compare it to the CAT SL-1 Mk 2. It will mess up your mind and ruin your day. Let's put it this way: have you ever seen a BAT get smoked? Friends, the CAT barbeques the BAT. |
[Sep 21, 2000]
leo
Audiophile
Strength:
musicality,bass,soundstage,openess.
Weakness:
did not found so far Made a signifacant improvment in my system: |
[Nov 15, 1999]
Greg
Audiophile
Strength:
Transparency, soundstage, sense of realism. Build quality.
Weakness:
Lack of remote input access. There's always a sense of joy listening to all of the BAT products. The VK5i ranks right up there with the VK50 SE in my book. I've a/b'd the two on occasion, though in fairness to the VK50 SE, I haven't actually lived with it. But, it's a major hair splitting contest between the two of these fine preamps from Balanced Audio Technology. The VK30, and VK50 have a friendlier remote design, but the VK5i has nothing to be ashamed of.....It is still one of the worlds finest preamps ever produced. Considering what some 5i's are selling for recently on the used market, it is a very affordable alternative as well. Be certain to check this fine specimen out if you're considering a preamp upgrade. You could do no wrong by buying this one blind if necessary. A easy 5 star plus rating!!! Similar Products Used: BAT VK30, BAT VK50 SE. |
[Jun 10, 1998]
Paul Riesberg
an Audiophile
After auditioning my BAT VK-5i my friend replaced his CAT SL-1 signature pre-amp with the BAT. We auditioned it both in his system and in mine, and in both cases the BAT offered greater clarity, detail and transparency. He's had the BAT unit for 8 months now and loves it even more than the day he bought it. He considers it 'a significant upgrade' from the CAT. I would have to agree after hearing them both. Perhaps the CAT might sound better in a particular configuration than the BAT, but I would seriously doubt it. The BAT sounded so much better in our systems. |
[Aug 18, 1998]
Greg Alder
BAT VK-5i |
[Jun 14, 1999]
Sertthin
an Audio Enthusiast
I finnally took the VK5i instead of the VK-50.After the dealer was kind enough to arrage home audition of both VK-5i and VK-50 at my home last Saturday. They came with understanding that I may end up not buying. |
[Jun 15, 1999]
bryan k
an Audio Enthusiast
I owned this preamp for eight months. Overall, I really liked it. Definitely it presents a very rich, detailed sound that is immediately pleasurable. I find it strange however that many reviewers describe BAT equipment as "not what you usually expect from tubes" or "neutral and dry like solid state" In contrast, I found the 5i to have qualities exactly corresponding to the "tube stereotype." The mid band dominates, and is loaded with information, the very top and bottom are just slightly underemphasized, and there absolutely not a trace of edginess or brightness. On the downside, the soundstage is not great. First the stage is narrow, not going too far past the outside edges of the speakers, and second the mid band is overly 'focused' in the center of the sound stage, such that the layering is compromised. The remote, build, and looks are all fantastic. Over time, the 'clump' in the midrange, which can heighten the intensity of closely miked vocals, the focused, yet small sound stage, and the emphasis of warmth and body became the trademark BAT sound for me. I found their CD player to sound similar, as well as their power amp. Supposedly, the stock Sovtek 6922s contribute a lot to this "character" so theoretically changing these tubes could improve things. I switched to a CAT mark II preamp, loaded with NOS tubes (Radiotechnique inputs and Telefunken outputs). The soundstage is literally twice as wide, the mid band 'clumping' is gone, the dynamics are slightly improved, and the overall organic nature of the sound is a level up. Music now sounds one more step away from a stereo system and one more step closer to the real thing. I still respect the BAT a lot- it is a major step over most big brand crap (rhymes with Grell and Dark Hevinson). In my opinion, the BAT's personality, although a good one, is a little too strong for a preamp. A more neutral piece will let the space of each recording to be more distinct, and can heighten the musical experience. Happy listening, |