McCormack Micro Line Drive Preamplifiers
McCormack Micro Line Drive Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 11, 2020]
Zhor
Strength:
First rate transparency, no active tube or solid state can't get closer to this transparency, one important thing EVEN IN PASSIVE MODE USE THE POWER SUPPLY as without it it's not at full sonics Weakness:
Power supply could be a little more refined Purchased: New
|
[May 08, 2006]
Jim VD
AudioPhile
Strength:
As much transparency as anyone could want, at any price really. Maybe the biggest bargain in all of audio. Build quality without par anywhere near this price.
Weakness:
Only 3 analog inputs, not usable in any surround config really. Volume pots easy to slip around. Crappy wallwart power supply, but not even needed for use in passive mode, you can leave it in the closet. I wrote a review many years ago here on this Pre. It has been my only Pre-amp since 1995. I have inefficient speakers (Mirage M7si) so I use active mode more often.
|
[May 20, 2002]
Mark M
AudioPhile
Strength:
Great transperency and details(in passive), indpended tape input, enough line inputs, dual-mono design, small and great looking, great for any budget, the best value under $1500 for the right system.
Weakness:
I would replace the stock attenuators by stepped ones definitely. I believe that everyone here that posted review on that product used it in passive mode. In active mode I get fatigue and switch back to passive. My system is built for passive pre-amplification: Sencitive VTL MB100 amps that always work in ultra-linear mode(due to the small voltages applied) and need just 0.75V to perform 100W/ch and 1.1V to output 110W/ch, ARC PH3 phono with EAR MC3 step-up trany that output together nearly 2V out of my Lyra Helikon SL cartridge. So my system is no as is solely depend on source components meaning that any investment towards upgrade will more benefit from changing source than amplification(not counting speakers) I''m not satisfied with active performance of this unit but I''m not satisfied as well hearing other active units such as Bryston BP25, EAR834L, VTL TL2.5. I.E. every time I''ve tried to come back to active seeking more punch and dynamics with measurable or no success at all with sacrifice of transperency naturality and details, the bottom line was passive Line Drive. I admit that this unit doesn''t have such quality parts as Placette and it certainly lacks a couple of quality stepped attenuators(BTW I''ve modified this unit to have those from Marchand Electronics -- the result was absolutely great!). Similar Products Used: Bryston 11b, Bryston BP25, VTL TL2.5, EAR 834L, AE3. |
[Feb 08, 2002]
chris shaver
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
It just dissappears in your system. I believe the PASSIVE mode is the best for my tastes as there is more detail there.
Weakness:
lack of more inputs and no remote although i guess that makes it more high end? Unbelievable unit. This preamp (in the passive mode) is almost not there. You can hear huge amounts of detail and the highs are extremely smooth. I was using a Mccormack DNA 0.5 and the bass from this combo seemed a little muddy and less than crisp. (This was somewhat alleviated by using the active mode) I just found a Levinson 27.5 which I have always wanted. The bass of this system is now perfect. Tight and very dynamic. I am going to mess around with the cables to get the vocals just right but it is real close to my idea of perfection. I will be keeping the MLD for a long time. Similar Products Used: Parasound PHP 850 Classe CP-30 |
[May 16, 2001]
Turk
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price,Size,Sound
Weakness:
Could use more imputs I think this is one honey of a preamp.To think that you could get this level of performance for the money is awsome.I use the unit as a passive preamp, I have enough bass out of my Snells. As a passive preamp the detail is great,so is the clarity. It really took the edge off, and added a richer fuller sound. I do not think I am going to be buying a preamp for many years. Similar Products Used: Creek,Marsh,Electrocampient |
[Apr 17, 2001]
Bruno Turkovich
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass control, imaging, size, price
Weakness:
Three imputs My first reaction when seeing this unit was, wow is it small. Luckly it sounds much bigger than it looks. The bass in my system is now more focused, greater detail.The rest of the sound now seems more three demensional. Over all this is a nice preamp especially for the money. I think you would be hard pressed to find a better unit in the price range of about $1000 to $1500. Similar Products Used: Rotel, Bryston, Marsh. |
[Sep 25, 1998]
Keith Chan
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought this preamp after waiting too long for the Creek OBH10 passive preamp to arrive. I was looking for a nice, cheap preamplifier for my new entry-level system; a friend brought over his McCormack MicroLineDrive (which he has hooked up to a pair of Llano monoblocks) to demostrate for me the difference between an active and passive preamp... in my listening tests, I decided that passive was the way to go. I preferred the clarity and details shown by the passive stage. Since then, I've learned a lot about impedance matching and cables matching necessary for a passive preamp, and furthermore, found out that the active stage on the MicroLineDrive is not its forte. And luckily, the output of my DAC (an Entech 203.2) has a rather high output of 2.5Vrms. |
[Dec 11, 2001]
G.L. McCullough
Audiophile
Strength:
Ability to run both actively and passively.
Weakness:
Strength of the passive stage are the weakness of the active stage and vice-versa. I have been through way too many components. Similar Products Used: Adcom GFP 750 |
[Feb 27, 1998]
crump
an Audio Enthusiast
I've been using this preamp for about a month now and highly recommend it with only one caveat: it IS a great stereo preamp with 3 inputs and two (active & passive) outputs. As with other McCormack gear, the build is fantastic, the sound clean and beautiful. For the price, really, you can't beat it. Sure, you can buy better quality but be prepared to spend 2k$ plus. Paired with the DNA 0.5 Deluxe amp (again, highly recommeded), an unbeatable combo. Once I replace my NHT 1.5's (which sound great in this setup) with Totem Model 1's, I'll give up 'the search' for awhile and just sit back and listen, which is what it's all about anyway.But, if you're selling mahogany model 1's... |
[Sep 12, 1997]
Matthew Kim
an Audio Enthusiast
After reading all the rave reviews, I was very interested in listening tothis unit. After comparing it to a $2500 Classe pre amp, I was sold. After |