McIntosh C712 Preamplifiers
McIntosh C712 Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 17, 2004]
bestsmurfs
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Detailed and fast with just enough features to get the job done. I like it better used at $600 than $1500.
Weakness:
Looks cheap as heck on the inside compared to the old stuff, but maybe that's why it's detailed and fast. Really a great preamp for the money, especially if you can buy it used in the $ 600 range. The controls are a little small and inexpensive looking when compared to the older Mc stuff. Inside everything is miniaturized. The sound is very precise and fast as noted by previous reviewers. I immediately liked the very detailed sound despite it being a little on the edgy side. I bought this preamp for my second stereo and interchanged it with my McIntosh C-40. The C-40 is just as detailed but is much more refined on the higher frequencies. This is most notable on a violin concerto where the smoothness is very apparent. The C-40 lacks remote control and has an absurd number of additional controls and features for the average critical listener like myself. Both pre-amps have loudness controls that can really fill in the bottom freqs when listening at low volume. I’m not such a purest that I need to keep it flat. I usually tune it so it sounds like music, but never boomy. Most of the time, I don’t even need to turn on the sub. Recent magazine reviews have substantiated that McIntosh has not lost their glory and several of their models offer exceptional value for the money. Similar Products Used: C-28, C-40 |
[Feb 27, 2002]
Escaladeur
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
looks and build, layout of controls, balanced outputs, just the essentials, excellent clarity, depth, and resolution.
Weakness:
Honestly, none. This preamp has just blown away my expectaions. I was previously a Krell fan (for too long!) and now I have discovered McIntosh. First off was a Mc2125 that offered superb sound for 25 years of age but was not quite fast enough for my kind of music. I recently got the c712 and McIntosh 7100 (see review of it too) and am just amazed at the speed, clarity, depth, resolution, focus, bass extenstion (truly impressive), and an overall envelopping warmth that these two convey. My former Krell KAV250p was dead sound-wise with a dumb remote but I did not realize all this until now. The C712 has just the features I want and nothing I dont. It has balanced outputs, bass and treble controls good for those crappy CD recordings we all sometimes get, loudness compensation (more useful than I once thought!), beautiful looks, easy to use knobs and not any miniscule black buttons, and awesome fit, finish, and looks. I just love it! I am keeping it for a long long time, that is for sure. Similar Products Used: Krell KAV250p, auditioned maybe 20 or 25 more of all different makes. |
[May 24, 2000]
Andy Block
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Simplicity, durability, easy to use controls
Weakness:
Expensive This "entry level" pre-amp was McIntosh's least expensive in 1995 at (gulp) $1500! However, it's simple construction is excellent for durability/reliabilty and sound quality. It has standard inputs for tuner, phono, video, and 2 CD players, all of which are selected by a rotary dial on the front panel. Two tape monitor/copy buttons control listening and tape to tape recording independent of the source dial. Independent "listen" and "record" dials are preferable, and available on better McIntosh models. Frequency equalization is available by single "Bass" and "Treble" knobs which are electronically removed from the signal path when turned to the "flat" position. I don't use these because they're too "heavy handed" for quality listening. I do use the "Loudness" knob. Yes KNOB, which allows the user to adjust the amount of "loudness" re-equalization (bass and treble boost) applied to the signal. It sounds hokey, but I like it! It also has mono and mute buttons and is almost fully controllable by remote. (The remote is beautiful although it's organization is only so-so.) This preamp sounds great! It adds little or nothing to the signal and the phono pre-amp is smooth and gutsy at the same time. At first I thought the highs were a little sharp, that it had a "clinical" sound, but after having owned this for 5 years I love the sound and have finally started listening (like the audiophiles) without any equalization. The incandescent bulbs behind the glass display panel have burned out twice. What a hassle. I wish they had just used LEDs. Overall, and especially for sound quality, this pre-amp is nearly perfect! |
[Jun 21, 2001]
Graham
Audiophile
Strength:
Doesn't draw attention to itself, no discernable sonic flaws
Weakness:
None in my system I've auditioned a large variety of preamps over the years, including Proceed and Mark Levinson. In my home environment, nothing has given me any reason to upgrade from my Mac. Similar Products Used: Linn, Yamaha, NAD |
[Nov 01, 1999]
Ali Fatemi
Audiophile
Strength:
exellent Phono section, very pleasent and warm midrang. tigh and controled bass
Weakness:
nothing particular One of the best Pre money can buy specially for LP lovers. Similar Products Used: Mcintosh MC7300 power amp, B&W matrix 802III, Marantz CD17 KI |
[Jun 11, 2001]
Kim Ji-Tae
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good design, easy to sound controls, good phono sounds
Weakness:
none Good price, good sounds. Similar Products Used: Adcom, Quad, Silvaweld(Korean product) |