Monarchy Audio Model 33 Preamplifiers
Monarchy Audio Model 33 Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[May 04, 2001]
Paul M
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparency, detail, flexibility of inputs, outputs
Weakness:
Needs one or two more RCA inputs This product will blow your socks off. It's that good. Before I purchased Monarchy products, I was being lured back into the 'all tube', elitist world of audio. This product brought me back home to solid state. Similar Products Used: Sonic Frontiers SFL-1, Audible Illusions MOD 3A, Creek OBH-12 |
[Mar 11, 2001]
Toby Douglass
Audiophile
Strength:
Strong DAC, excellent analogue output, excellent specification, impressive price point
Weakness:
None First, my system; Similar Products Used: AC3R, Classe Five, ProPassion, OBH-10 |
[Jan 22, 2002]
Phil
Audiophile
Strength:
rational package of excellent components; great sound;
Weakness:
pre-amp section could add an extra edge to bright system. In-you-face joyful personality of Monarchy-33 DAC is a matter of taste - it fits mine. Sound is very MUSICAL and involving, still. A piece of audio equipment should not be necessary dull, non-detailed and lean to be considered musical - and fine sounding DAC should not necessary be an upsampler. |
[May 17, 1999]
MARK PIETSCH
an Audiophile
WELL I THOUGHT I'D BE THE FIRST TO SUBMIT A REVIEW ON THE MONARCHY 33 DAC/PREAMP,BUT SOMEONE BEAT ME TO IT. I ALSO BOUGHT IT ALONG WITH THE MONARCHY SE100 AMPS, BUT I GOT THE BASIC MODEL. I'VE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET AHOLD OF ANYONE WHO HAS HEARD THE DELUX ALONG SIDE THE BASIC, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY SONIC DIFFERNCE. (MONARCHY'S AD CLAIMS "NO SONIC DIFFERENCE"). AT ANY RATE, THE SOUND IS THE BEST I'VE EVER HEARD, AFTER REVIEWING SIMILAR PRICED COMPONENTS OR BETTER. I RUN WITH LEGACY SIGNATURE III'S, AND A MARANTZ CD TRANSPORT. SOUND IS EXTREMELY OPEN, AND BASS IS TIGHT AND POWERFUL. THE LEGACY SIG III'S ARE VERY GOOD WITH DEEP BASS, BUT CAN BE OVERBEARING WITH UPPER BASS IN MY ROOM, BUT THE MONARCY PREAMP/AMP COMBINATION SEEMS TO CONTROL THEM VERY WELL. |
[May 16, 1999]
Keith
an Audiophile
My equipment:Monarchy SE amps |
[Oct 03, 2000]
Brad Buckley
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clarity, warmth, versatility, Price
Weakness:
None that I can hear or see I bought this unit as part of a complete system replacement. I was primarily interested in the DAC but when I became aware that I could get a DAC and a Pre Amp combo decided to try the model 33. This gave me the advantage of less equipment cost outlay and less space taken up. I am using a pioneer DVD player as the transport (as an experiment I tried a horrid DVD player made by apex and it sounded good also although I wouldn't buy one). The combination of the model 33 and Pioneer DVD player has worked out beyond my expectation. I auditioned a lot of CD players and/or DAC's. The DAC in the model 33 sounded as good or better than than all of them, some of which cost 5 to 8 times as much. With a good CD (reference etc) the sound is like vinyl without the surface noise. I can even stand to listen to remastered, overcompressed CD's now. I would describe the sound as clear, warm and balanced. Inner voices are easy to hear. What it doesn't have is the glass scrape highs so typical of bad digital sound. Violins actually sound like they are made of wood not aluminum! The pre amp part of the model 33 is very versatile and includes both RCA's and Balanced XLR inputs and outputs. I do not know of any other equipment in this price range that has Balanced connectors. There are enough outputs that I can connect Amps and have 2 sets of RCA outputs left over for other equipment plus digital COAX and toslink inputs for the DAC. Supplied Power cord is very good. Build and finish is first rate, gold plated RCA's and an audiophile volume control. As good as the DAC is, when fed by a Monarchy 24/96 DIP it gets even better plus I now have the ability to play audio DVD's. All of the above for less than a grand. I also appreciated that C.C. Poon was was more than willing to spend time talking with me and answering questions. Shipping was prompt and well packed. I have had no problems with it since I got it and I have had it on 24 hours a day for 4 weeks now testing and burning it in (thank god for the digital cable music channels). This is a piece of equipment that deserves serious consideration by anyone looking for high quality that just happens to be affordable. 5 stars Similar Products Used: Arcam, California, Musical Fidelity, Creek, Krell, etc |
[Nov 10, 2000]
William
Audiophile
Strength:
Excellent DAC with line-level pre in a single chassis. Outstanding tonal balance, clarity, soundstage....for less than the price of a pre or DAC anywhere close to this quality.
Weakness:
Wish it has an absolute phase inverter, not because it necessarily needs it, but I'd like to experiment with it. I've meant to get around to writing this for awhule, and the new Audio Electronics just ran an article on the piggy-back chip Monarchy tweak. My M33 has it, so I thought I'd add my 2 cents. I decided some months ago to try the Monarchy SE 100 delux class A monoblocs. Since I was running an Acurus DIA 100 MK.II (a one box with a passive 'pre' into a high gain stage), I obviously need a pre to go with it. Mr. Poon, the owner of Monarchy suggested I get the M33 instead of his line-level pre, promising that the DAC section would outshine my Link 2. I figured, what the heck, the price differential was sufficiently small that it seemed worth the chance. I was a little apprehensive about running analogue sources through a line level in the same box as a DAC, but , again, I figured i'd go for it. I soon added the piggy-back tweak...imagine, a factory-installed tweak. The AE article I mentioned explains the rationale. Improves noise and dynamic range, a 3db per doubling improvement. And all 4chips are top-grade BurrBrown PCM 63 PK, a self-trimming resistor ladder chip that I understand to be highly-regarded. But those are technical observations. The real question is,how's the sound? I have a modest Parasound CDP 1000 player/transport. It feeds a Monarchy DIP. The first one I got improved the sound out of my old Link in a huge way, so I added a second. In my present set-up, the M33 is fed the twice-reclocked signal via 2m of AES/EBU. The thing that struck me about the M33 with digital sources was how undigital it sounded. I enjoy analogue through a Rega 25. There is something about the solidity and realism of sound that hasnt been reassembled. But I find that the M33 draws digital very near vinyl (with some CD's besting some vinyl), not because of some euponic manipulation of the sound to eliminate digital problems, but by overcoming the digital nasties. Steely strings, artificial cymbals, sibilant voices, flattened sound stages, harsh horns, mooshed together instruments...all gone. It struck me that the M33 sorted out all of the seperate elements in the music, not in isolation, but preserving their interrelationship within the music. Two jazz horns, in close proximity on the stage retain their seperate identities, Brass has a sweet tone, but without softening their bite. Orchestral works are layered on a huge stage. Clear highs, solid bass without bloat. Hall reverb, image depth, yeah, it sounds more like a live venue. If it seems like I'm repeating audiophile reviewer cliches, prehaps I am because that is the language I'm familiar with. But all those phrases accurately describe the 33. Oh, and as a line-level handling the analogue input, I can hear no adverse effects from the physical proximity of the digital electronics. Instead, I hear nothing in the way of the sound, just the ability to change volume levels. I've heard a number of DAC-du-jours, and a variety of one boxes that run from the ridiculous to the sublime in price. Recognizing that some of them were in unfamiliar system contexts, I cannot say that i have personally heard the M33 bested on Red Book reproduction. Indeed, I just moved up a rung on the Magnepan speaker hierarchy, and the M33 had what it took to raise the goose-bump level..it was up to the task of delivering something near the current best in CD reproduction. Five stars. P.S.Like my DIPs and Amps, build quality that puts others to shame at anything near their price-points. Similar Products Used: MSB Link, Acurus DIA |
[Nov 15, 2000]
Valter C
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparency, dynamics, realistic timbre, localization of sound sources, solid build, deep and precise bass, preamp + DAC in the same box
Weakness:
none I could find After communicating with Mr. C.C. Poon through email (his prompt replies and helpful advice before and after my purchase of his products were examplary of what a good customer service should be like), I finally purchased the DAC M33 and a DIP 24/96 from his HK distributor. The DAC and DIP improved the sound of CDs in just about every aspect of sound reproduction re. my Rega Planet alone. Really no contest. With the M33 (no DIP) the difference was already very clear: better transparency and detail, improved transients, more realistic timbre of instruments and voice, much better dynamics, more bass extension. While before I could hear that something was present 'down there', I could not hear clearly distinguishable bass lines. This changed when the M33 was in the system, with the Rega used as transport. The improvement in the reproduction of low frequency sounds was a real surprise, since I wrongly thought that the lack of precision and extension at low frequencies was due to the fact that my speakers (Sonus Faber Concerto) are bass-shy and that their placement in my room was less than ideal. Another improvement was better localization of sounds. When I introduced the DIP things got even better: bass sounds had even sharper attack and better defined pitch, instrument localization improved, but especially transients became more realistic. With the DIP, I can hear the noise of the bow on the string of violins and the puff of air in flute sounds; never happened before, not even with the M33. Brief, I am very enthusiastic about the improvement in sound quality brought by this purchase. Similar Products Used: none |