Onkyo P-304 Preamplifiers
Onkyo P-304 Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 27, 2008]
twc644
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth tight bass
Weakness:
No loudness button
This review may not be a fair one.Soley based review with the preamp completely re-capped by me.I used nothing but good quality capacitors.In original form it was too dry sounding with not much dynamics.This applies to most commercial offerings in my opinion--they tend to have great designs but use crappy capacitors to cut cost.This in turn holds back the true potential of sound a lot of this equipment is capable of.
Similar Products Used: Luxman tp114
|
[Sep 25, 2003]
Jake Abrams
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
6 line level inputs with 2 tape loops in either direction and 2 quality phono inputs, what more can one want in a pre-amp of this caliber. The record outs and main preout can be switched on and off for serious headphone listening or Bi-amp, tri-amp applications which is how I presently have it set up. Good pre's of today are alot of money, so if you find one like I did. bring it home for the hell of it......Jake
Weakness:
Mine was mint, so cosmetically it was perfect. I removed the side panels and wished for it to be easily rackmounted, but no dice so far. I brought this thing home on a whim, and after dusting it off, I can tell that it was hardly used. This P-304 blew away my Bi-fet pre-amps that I had modified for a pretty penny. A true no frills line level pre-amp, w/MC input for all you vintage guys. The tone control can be defeated, but they are actually usable, due to their unusual contour. The manual explains this feature thoroughly. If someone can modify mine to be rackmounted in a 19" inch EIA audio rack, call me today. 812-466-5952 Similar Products Used: Van Alstine super Fet pre, modified pas pre, and other vintage pre-amps. |
[Aug 22, 2002]
grando
AudioPhile
Strength:
Deathly silent; no crosstalk; even frequency response
Weakness:
remote would be nice, but this is a matter of opinion Truly, sound as it was meant to be heard. Before purchasing the 304, I had been using a $2000 plus preamp. After hearing my friends system, we swapped preamps. The 304 blew my amp away. I made him a swap offer which he refused. After a short search, I located a 304 for sale and jumped at the $300 ticket. Now, I experience sound - as it was meant to be heard. |
[Nov 04, 2000]
Saul
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Simple design. Solid construction.
Weakness:
No remote This is the only preamp I have ever owned. From listening to lots of other demos I think I would desribe this preamp as neutral and plain. I get the best response from vocals and mid range with this. I don't have any real comparisons but I also don't have any complaints. I do wish I could use a remote with this. |
[Feb 15, 2001]
Desmond Parfait
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent specs.,and the sound quality,build quality to back up those claims,plus great price!Like all Onkyo products,a real effort is made to channel the most important features into vital designs that offer major value and little nonsense.In the case of this preamp,it means clean design,clean sound.Defeatable tone controls,charging noise-filters,other features contribute to the sound quality.
Weakness:
For those who care(not me),no remote.Some would find the simulated-wood side panels a negative,but I think the look is subdued enough to counter the typical "industrial-black-box"look,without looking hokey. I bought this preamp for 3 reasons:Reviews all around favorable,Price,and previous experience with Onkyo that indicated high value/moderate prices.I bought this item on sale at $200 below retail.Rich and all the guys at Star-Audio are the best.(We are lucky to have adventurous enough salesman in this cowboy state who actually will stock not only the Japanese brands, but also the best foreign,domestic brands like: B+W,Klipsch,Sunfire,Macintosh,Grado,RBH,others.I bought this preamp because the clean ciruitry to even the (Gasp!) headphone-jack would bring out the best sound from my Grado haedphones,and although I will buy a quality Amp for speaker use one day,most of my listening is via Grado.This is the best way to Great HI-FI sound rivalling Amp/Speaker combos worth thousands of bucks.The jack on this preamp will deliver ample power,uncolored sound,detail and smooth, balanced delivery of the sonics,more so than the jack found on my Onkyo receiver,which also gives a fine sound.No one can go wrong with this beautiful preamp,which will mate so well with even very Hi-end amps or other equipment.A rock-solid foundation on which to build your HI-FI dreams!And,what a steal... Similar Products Used: Onkyo TX-8210 receiver. |
[Sep 16, 2000]
Chris Troianello
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound. Clean, wonderful sound unmatched at the price.
Weakness:
Z-Roe
Similar Products Used: Adcom GFP-750, B&K PT3 |
[Jul 15, 2000]
Jonathan Van Meter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very smooth sound
Weakness:
No remote OK, I probably have the oldest P-504 reviewed here, so keep in mind that the P-504 that sells today might be slightly different than the one that I own. I feel that it is a testiment to the quality of the design of this pre-amp (and the M-504 power amp) that the same design has been sold for at least 12 years. A note to all of the present day purchasers: All of you are very lucky. When I bought mine, it was a bit more expensive. Luckily for you, over the last decade, the price has slowly decreased. Similar Products Used: Many auditioned in stores. Nothing directly to compare to in my own system. |
[Jul 19, 2001]
sudeep
Casual Listener
Strength:
crispy sound, silent, phono option, build construction is good
Weakness:
the only one i find is the lack of remote got a new one at a bargain price at 199, got the last one which was available, it is very good. The good thing about,is the nice sound, detail, good bass, trebal and good vocals.I have NAD power amp, Infinity speakers, Cambridge audio CD PLAyer. The pre amp sound good in all types of music. The best was classical, and soul music where the voice is rich , but not too harsh...there is a softness to the voice..perfect what i Like. |
[Jan 07, 2002]
Michael G.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Really excellent design and value for the money,lots of features and inputs,an excellent stepped attenuator,decent looks,phono stage is very good for vinyl-lovers.
Weakness:
Minor weaknesses include no remote,non-detachable power cord,that's about all... The operative phrase here is "Quality where it counts most." ...You will not find more bang-for-the-buck,which seems pretty typical of Onkyo and Integra product lines,all in all. Articulate,warm-but-not-soggy,tuneful,integrated flat response,tight-not-boomy,extended highs,black-silent,inner detail,fast transients,tracks the decay of notes way across and down,and more..,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes,yes! !! I bought this preamp primarily as a headphone-amp of sorts with the unusual advantage of numerous inputs for all needs inclusive. And boy,the jack on this baby really does deliver music that is clean and quiet and just...WOW! For Grado headphones I only need about 8 O'clock volume (about 30 ohms),and about 10 O'clock for my AKG K-501's (about 130 ohms),and I'll bet this preamp-jack has enough power to run Sennheiser 600's (about 300 ohms),although I have not tried this. The dead-quiet characteristics of this preamp make it ideal for headphone use. I plan to one day match it up with a tube-amp one day for speaker use,and I am sure I will be just as happy with the results then as I am now. Similar Products Used: Various brands auditioned. |
[Dec 25, 2001]
Mike P
Audiophile
Strength:
Excellent power supply;utterly silent. Absolutely no cross-talk between inputs. Rich sound,correct tone controls,great mm phono stage. Build quality.
Weakness:
None at its price (even at its original price) I have used many High-end preamps over the years,some sounded great most only so-so.Almost all of them were a pain in the rear to use;they either had no phono (rip off),no tape outs(contaminates the sound don't ya know,I guess buffers are beyond them),no switching to speak of,no tone controls (sacrilege!),are poor in reliablity (NAD and most tube preamps) or have horrible human engineering (twin volume controls ,weird box shapes so that no way can they fit on a shelf).Of all the High-enders that I have used, only the Spectral was worth the pain it put me thru. Its sound was truly first rate into almost any amp. Alas at the end of the speaker project it had to go home... Similar Products Used: Spectral,Van Alstine Pass4,Threshold(various),PS Audio,Krell,Audible Illusions(pre 90's),SuperPhon,Conrad Johnson (various),NAD,Rotel,Parasound |