Harman Kardon HK 3380 Receivers
Harman Kardon HK 3380 Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 11, 2020]
CracknThump
Strength:
A very sleek looking unit which was a nice surprise. Sound is superb. The clarity is much better when compared to my old NAD 319 amp. I am very pleased with my secondhand purchase for fifty quid. Weakness:
I agree with the previous comments that the plugs on the back area a tad flimsy. Price Paid: 50
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 3380
|
[Oct 23, 2008]
JerzyDevil
Casual Listener
Strength:
Price. Has remote control. Sounds musical as a stereo should. Good value.
Weakness:
Lacks overhead or reserve power. Weak bass. Flimsy jacks feel like they could break.
I purchased the HK 3380 to replace an aging NAD that had plenty of power and overhead but no channel separation or musicality. The NAD seemed to need a serious overhaul which was not worth the cost. I decide to try the bargain priced HK before upgrading to pricier equipment. Even running somewhat inefficient Vienna Acoustics speakers, the HK does just fine. Of course the sheer power of more expensive stereos might be absent, but for the price I am not complaining. |
[Feb 24, 2008]
becleave
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
I'm not much for reading audio reviews, so my impression may need some clarification
Weakness:
I did find that
I bought this receiver to replace an HK avr20 II which had owned for 3 years.
Similar Products Used: Harman Kardon avr 20 mark II |
[Aug 31, 2006]
paladinmrb
AudioPhile
Strength:
Features. It has a lot of features for a 2 channel reciever. The pre-out / amp-in as well as stereo subwoofer RCA out are obscure and useful.
Weakness:
I was using a aging, classic Pioneer SX-3700 reciever for a den computer system. The Pioneer was starting to have some noise issues and channel balance issues. I did a little looking and comparsion shopping in the now relatively small 2-channel reciever market. I found a good deal on the Harmon/Kardon HK-3800. My range was 200 dollars. I paid $199.99 with free shipping promotion at JM.com. The unit has an MSRP of $245.00.
Similar Products Used: Pioneer FM Quartz-Locked Stereo Reciever SX-3700
|
[Mar 08, 2006]
life_is2
Casual Listener
Strength:
sound quality, power, ofcourse looks, and build quality
Weakness:
tuner is a little weak but look at the spec's on all of the top receivers, denon included. great product. i purchased from harman kardon direct on ebay. got a great deal. i am very pleased w/purchase. great sound for price. i would recommend this product to anyone. i am running a pair of cerwin-vega 10 inch floor standing speakers rated at 200 watts. this little amp pushes them just fine. the best characteristic of this receiver is that it doesn't over do the highs (like onkyo receivers), just perfect sound all the way across the frequency band. would no doubt buy another for double the money. had and avr525 for the home theatre and never has skipped a beat. i know this will be a product that i get a lot of use out of for years to come. recommend 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Customer Service great, never had a problem with support if needed.(only needed once for a recorder that skipped the first few seconds of song during recording,cdr26, replaced with new one no questions asked.) Similar Products Used: kenwood( no comparison) and sony(good receiver but blew speakers to easy due to clipping) |
[May 24, 2005]
poneal
AudioPhile
Strength:
Nice amp section, radio. I like the basic layout and feel. Easy to use and not complicated like the AVR sereis.
Weakness:
Toylike remote. I needed a standard old stereo receiver for my bedroom and did not want to pay a fortune for it. I noticed this on ebay and ended up winning it for $135. Z-stock but carrying the full factory warranty. First, the receiver arrived and it looked brand new. No scratches, etc. Everything worked. Nice power, etc. It even came with batteries for the remote which was kind of toylike. The amp section is definitely HK. Nice lower end thump and plenty of power. I keep mine at -45 ot -40 for most listening. The radio works fine and came with supplied am and fm antenna and 75ohm to 300ohm adapter. All I can say is that for $135.00 I definitely feel that I got more than what I paid for. Way to go HK. I did not have the smell thing or have any problems with this unit. |
[Aug 22, 2004]
mark93109
AudioPhile
I wanted a receiver with a digital remote volume control (the motorized analog volume control on my Marantz SR-68 was too crude) and a phono input (I play a record once or twice a year). And, since I am convinced that all solid-state electronics sounds exactly the same (if you believe different, it's fine with me, but you're invited over to my place for some blind listening sessions), I wanted to pay as little as possible. I would have liked to have seen it before buying, but the HK website says that their only dealer in my area is Circuit City, and the Circuit City website says that this model is sold online only! So, at this price, I figure I can take a chance, and I do. (Not at Circuit City though, which has far from the lowest online price.) When I open the box, the first thing that hits me is the *smell*. This receiver stinks! Literally! It's got some plastic in it that's gassing off something awful! I stick it in in the garage for a week, out of the box. The smell goes down, but I sitll don't like to get too close! Next, I plug it in. HUMMMMMMMM!!!! Sounds like an airplane is in the room with me. Shoulda read more HK reviews here; it seems hum is a standard problem with their low-end receivers. I unscrew a zillion screws and pop off the cover. Sure enough, as I learned from another review, the power transformer is bolted right to the chassis. I go to the hardware store and buy some quarter-inch-thick rubber grommets, and some longer #6 machine screws to replace the ones HK uses. But, oops, theirs aren't quite #6's; my news ones won't go in. And #8's are clearly too big. Some metric thing? I don't know, but my hardware store doesn't have any. So I slice my rubber grommets in half, and now they're thin enough to allow me to use HK's original screws. I bolt the transformer back down, power 'er up, and ... dead quiet! Why HK couldn't spend a penny on four rubber grommets is beyond me. Now everything is fine. The remote works well, but its color scheme is dark gray letters on a light gray background, which means it's totally unreadable unless you're under a spotlight. Got to memorize those button positions ... Well, it works. It's cheap. It sounds exactly like all other electronics sound, now that I've gotten rid of that nasty hum. If you're not willing to open it up and stick in those rubber grommets, keep looking. If you are, it's about as cheap as you can get for a digital volume control and phono input. And it sounds exactly like everything else. Similar Products Used: Marantz SR-68 |
[Jul 08, 2004]
Bernard
AudioPhile
Strength:
Looks, power, rich juicy sound, excellent imaging and soundstaging.Very appealing sound. Good tuner.
Weakness:
What happened to the midrange? Always wanted to try a HK product as I liked the look and their high amp philosopy. When I got it home I must say I fell in love with the looks and the build quality. Both first rate for the money and basically as good as it gets. The remote works well and controls other HK products only. Connected it to Paradigm monitor 7v2 speakers and a NAD 540 cd player with Ixos interconnect. The sound quality is very good but not perfect. The bass is is nice and full and has a nice "juicy" or "lush" sound very rich sounding and well controlled but not super tight. The highs are also very sweet and rich sounding and have excellent detail and definition. Very nice. I also found that this receiver has outstanding imaging. You can really place the instruments very well. The Amp has power to burn HK really delivers in this aspect. The tuner also sounded very nice and sweet and had good reception with the supplied short antenna. All around this receiver has a lot going for it. However.... After listening to it for a week and letting it play all weekend (CD on repeat) I couldn't help but notice that the midrange was lost and vocals were indistinct and undefined. This really started to bother me after a few days and I returned it and purchased a NAD 320BEE amp. What a difference!!! The mids were back and the sound more balanced. Fantastic Amp! All in all the HK is a good product if you like RAP/Hip Hop dance, etc. If you like smiley face EQ setting (lots of bass and treble) and like lots of power and need the convenience of a built in tuner this is a decent set. If you like accuracy and balance and want to be able to critically listen to any music that contains midrange (most music) look elsewhere. Similar Products Used: Nad 320BEE int. Amp., NAD T761 receiver. |