Kenwood AR-1090 Receivers
Kenwood AR-1090 Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 13, 2000]
Sam Anderson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Healthy number of A/V inputs, and outputs, ample power, dual source and zone, Macro Functions on Remote.
Weakness:
Some key functions not available from remote. I have lived with this receiver since Feburary of 1998. Similar Products Used: Various NAD, Sony, and JVC reveivers. |
[Mar 01, 2000]
Paul Tillman
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Inputs. Dolby Digital
Weakness:
Needs more digital inputs and component video switching. Overall a very affordable receiver for the wattage output and the features. I had a AV-1080 prior to this one and the upgrade was worth it. Easy to set up Similar Products Used: AV-1080 |
[Mar 15, 1999]
Pierce Cotter
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased the 1090 about a year ago for 899.00 at Sound Advice as a discontinued item. They are still around mail order for around 500 or so which is a steal. I use the receiver with a Sony S3000 DVD, Pioneer Laser Disc, Hitach DSS Sat system. The specs say 150 watts per channel but at 6 ohms which puts 8 ohm wattage around 110 or so. Not that impressive but the receiver includes preouts for 6 a channels with video out and 2 b channels or room b with video out. I have connected seperate power amps to the unit using three for the main system and one for the room b which is actually 4 pairs of outdoor speakers for the pool and deck areas. Essentually I am using it as a pre amp. The remote is awesome once you get the hang of it and with the on screen display it doesn't take long. The DSP modes are wasted, If I want reverb, I have a seperate eq/reverb unit attached to the tape monitor. The best part is being able to watch a DV D in the den while listening to a CD outside with seperate volume controls for both. AC3 decoding seems fine and it has inputs in the rear for anything you can think of, and then some. For the price, you can't beat it. Yes, maybe some of the others have better specs, but you will pay four to six times the money for better specs that your ear can't hear anyway. You know that anything below 0.1% distortion is inaudible to the human ear so do you think going from 0.08% to 0.008% for a thousand more bucks matters. I don't think so. Give it a good look when shopping. You won't be disappointed with it, but you will always wonder why you spent 2 grand on a 60 watt H&K or Yamaha system. I give it thumbs up in quality and price. |
[Dec 17, 1999]
Joseph Buonomo
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Vast array of s-video inputs and outputs
Weakness:
No DTS I bought this unit refurbished for approx $450.00, so my views may not be the same as someone who purchased this unit new for over $1000!! The unit and the remote have operated flawlessly with great sound. |
[Mar 02, 2000]
Davis Bacon
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
price, audio quality, dolby digital performance
Weakness:
No DTS, remote control lacks sophistication to control other types of equipment, audio power lacking Biggest flaw is the remote control, it does control most of my other components but some functions are not available and I think they should be. I've tried the Sony 2000 remote control to eliminate some of my many remote controls without success. One button is used to cycle through your attached video components VCR, DVD, LD etc. which cannot be learned by MANY remote controls. |
[Jun 10, 1998]
Chadwick
an Audio Enthusiast
Purchased in April for $899, and paired with the energy take5 and a marantz cc48, I am quite happy with the performance and capabilities of the 1090. I seriously considered the denon3200 as is heavily pushed by many others. However, I believe CDs sound richer and are more detailed (digital) on the Kenwood, while AC3 was similar to the denon. The DSP modes, like on most makes / models, are of little practical use. I also like the dual room control feature. The remote is a hassle and cumbersome to learn, but one gets used to it after a couple weeks of use. |
[Apr 23, 1998]
Jim King
an Audio Enthusiast
I must admit buying this receiver when my Yamaha died on a whim. Based on a store demo, plus a Stereo Review test drive, I purchased same mail order about six months ago. Little did I know how impressed I would be. I really liked the old 80 watt Yamaha. However, I love this Kenwood. At 150 watts to all five channels, I have yet to be disapointed. Home Theatre is top notch, while the ample selection of music ambience settings are more than adequate. The stereo setting is still my favorite for rock or country though. As goes with any good reciever, speakers make or break the system, in this case Defenitive BP 30's. If your speakers are up to the task, trust the review and then be patient in the set up process. The dividends are worth it. |
[Apr 09, 1998]
Randolph
an Audio Enthusiast
Just bought the European equivalent model (KR-V999D)today on sale (for about $760). I am using 120W speakers on all channels and it sounds great ! But really I need to play a little longer to tell you more about it, it has so many gadgets. Also need to try my DVD player on it (but they are not selling films here in the Netherlands yet until the end of this year). I just wanted to start some reviews on this model and see what others think. I will try to comment again on it later when I know more. I'll start it of with a 5 star as this really is the cheapest AC-3 receiver I could get and it seems to be a really nice deal !! |
[Jun 03, 1998]
oderus
The kenwood is definetely a receiver that fools the uneducated buyer by offering alot more power than other better brands that offer less power with more amps and we all know amps are better than watts anyways the denon avr-3200 blows the kenwood away. |
[May 09, 1998]
John Pheltsol
an Audiophile
I went with a friend to Gramophone LTD. to help him purchase an AC-3 Receiver. The Salesman showed us the Pioneer VSX-05, DENON AVR-3200, Marantz SR-80, Sony STR-DA90ESG, Kenwood 1090 VR, and Yamaha RX-V992. The Kenwood had good performance but if you find a receiver in the same price range as the others but the others have ALOT less power you begin to wonder.The Kenwood did not have that good AC-3 Performance. The Digital Filters did not filter out the Jults in the Audio. The DSP Processor however was very good. But the Yamaha is alot more believable. Out of all of the receivers the Yamaha and the Sony were the most recommended. The Sony had very good Amplification and good AC-3 Processing. The downside is the DSP Processor. It seems as if it just puts a delay on the surround channel. The Yamaha had the Best AC-3 Performance and the Amplification was top-notch. the DSP Processor was very believable and made you believe that you were in a actual Theater. After hours of testing and negotiating, he decided to get the Yamah RX-V992. |