We at Baltimore Drywall Contractors office are satisfied with 2250B performance.

None so far.

It initially blew me away played through my dad's old Electro-Voice speakers

None so far, Moreno Valley Foundation Repair & Waterproofing Pros<,/a>

Great sound and good looks.- Tire Replacement

none . . .

Thank you for sharing this here, I want this for our business. construction services

Don't have this yet.

This is a wonderful product. Thanks Tethered Drones

none so far

This product has exceeded my expectations. Everything works perfectly and is of high quality. They don't make stuff like this anymore. Regards from Lubbock

None for now I am still observing the unit

HF performance not as focused or smooth as quality modern equipment, Tone controls and pre-amp circuit seem to be the weakest link, amplifyer section sounds better on it's own. truck repair company

none . .

Price Paid: $165.00 from craigslist

Summary:
I got this beast on craigslist for the great price of $165. The receiver was restored and all the light were changed. Everyone was talking how good those Marantz receivers are and I decided to get one. What can I say about the sound? You can tell by the reviews of the other people and the brand name! It is a very clear sound with deep bass and the mids and highs are so clear. This silver face with the light will take your eyes right away! The receiver can drive any speakers with a lot of power. It is rated 50W but it sounds for 10 times more so don't judge by the wattage.

Strengths:
Clear warm sound, great bass, mids and highs with adjusting levels

Weaknesses:
None

Similar Products Used:
Sansui, Mcintosh, Yamaha, Pioneer and all old classic receivers

Great sound and good looks.

May require maintenance of technician quality unless your a do-it-your-selfer with some knowledge of electronics and a strong desire to learn.

Very smooth sounding receiver and yes it is audiophile quality by any means.
Old audio equipment should be checked by a vintage tech before using.
This sounds better than my Yamaha RX-V870 surround. Also sounds better than my Pioneer SX-980 somewhat. One quarter volumne is usually loud enough, but one half volumne will really rock the place. This will blow away the 80 watts per channel yammie I have. Sonically the best I've listened to so far.This I'll never part with.

Similar Products Used:

Pioneer SX-980
Marantz 1515

Superb build quality, Excelent sound for the vintage, Great tuner out-performs almost anything made today, Plenty of inputs, Pretty to look at

HF performance not as focused or smooth as quality modern equipment, Tone controls and pre-amp circuit seem to be the weakest link, amplifyer section sounds better on it's own.

A great, reliable, well built peice of equipment. Sounds good enough to listen to, I still keep it around for the tuner. I bought a 2250 at a yard sale when I was 12, it was my first step up form the Fisher Price recod player I had since I was 6. It initialy blew me away played through my dad's old Electro-Voice speakers. Sure it was step up from the Fisher Price unit... Any way I continued to enjoy this receiver for many years to come, with my Sony cd player, EPI model 70s, then Paradigm Titans and fianly Paradigm Mini-Monitor V1s, at which point I realized my receiver was now the limiting factor, not my speakers. I replaced it with a Jolida 101 integrated tube amp, but the Marantz's awsome analog adjusted PLL tuner continued to provide my AM/FM until the Onkyo TXDS494 rocketed me into the multi-chanel world. The Marantz is built like a tank in all respects, and has a great look with all the soft blue and creamy-white light comming from the front panel. The amplifyer section may actualy be stronger than the pre-amp section in over all audio quality (running the variable outputs from my Sony CD directly into the processor loop in on the Marantz yeilded cleaner treble and tigher bass) and although it's sound is stellar for solid state equipment of it's vintage it manages to be both a little smeary and a little grainy in the top octives. Bass performance is good, but it doesn't rule with an Iron Fist the way some Sansui and all McIntosh equipment of this vintage does. Then again it was less expensive than either when new. Midrange sound is smooth reasonably dynamic and mostly free of color. Better built than anthing you can buy today for less than $2000, and still good enough to run a second system without too many apologies. I suspect I'll pass this unit to my children or grand-children (if I ever have any) and someone might still be using and enjoying it 100 years from now.

Similar Products Used:

Sansui G-5700 McIntosh MAC-1900 Sherwood receiver