NAD L40 CD Receivers
NAD L40 CD Receivers
USER REVIEWS
[Mar 06, 2001]
Joe France
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Natural Sound. Very Good FM tuner. Can play all types of music at moderate sound levels.
Weakness:
None apparent as yet. Build quality just a little suspect, nothing proven. Once we put my Copland/Meadowlark system downstairs away from the toddler, my wife wanted music in the dining area of the house. Not a really small room by any means. We bought the Bose large one box sound system, and found it underwheliming to say the least. We sent it back. I auditioned the Linn Classic, and thought it was very nice, but not so much nicer than the NAD L40 that I would want to spring for the extra thousands. I bought the NAD and my non-audio enthusiast wife thinks its great. And, if fact, so do I. It's not a big rich sound, but then the packaged PSB Minis are not broken. But it makes beautiful music at volumes below 50% and very acceptable sound up to 75%. Vocals and piano are really very good. No fatigue, and the FM without any special antenae is virtually distortion free, although I must say I live in an FM rick area. Music tastes: Classical, show, soft rock and jazz. Now mom and baby are dancing again!!!!!! Similar Products Used: Linn Classic, Bose One Box System (forget what it's called) |
[May 21, 2001]
jimmy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
tuner, decent psb speakers
Weakness:
cd player, remote, no am tuner, overall sound Wow, I can't believe how dissapointed I was this system. I've read so many good reviews here and elsewhere, I couldn't believe how weak this system was(and I'm not talking about power). my main gripe was the cd payer, terrible error correction and poor sound. I have several cds that have some scratches on them that my old sony bookshelf system could handle fine, the nad was skipping constantly and you can hear every blemish. the sound for the cd was fine for classical but don't try to listen to rock on this thing, blech. the L40 give you crisp vocals and drums but the guitars, bass and keyboards all are smushed into the same space here, muddy. Overall I thought the system souded a little too lifeless. I put most of the blame on the bad sound on the cd part of the system because the tuner sounds pretty good. for some reason they left off an AM tuner, wich was a mistake becasue this unit would be best suited for talk radio. Terrible remote. Similar Products Used: bose, sony |
[Sep 17, 2001]
Dan Higgins
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amplifier has lots of headroom. Great Tuner. Remote is laid out in a simple, logical manner. Solid Build quality.
Weakness:
CD Drawer is flimsy. Remote lacks programming abilities. I was looking for an all in one unit that was well made. |
[Oct 26, 2001]
Brock
Casual Listener
Strength:
Nice sounding tuner. Low cost. Simple, all-in-one unit if that's what you're looking for.
Weakness:
Sound from CD player lacks life. Poor sound quality at low volumes--volume needs to be atleast to the 10 o'clock position for this unit to really open up. Volume "steps" controlled from remote are too large. Makes a "pop" when turned on. I'm disappointed with the NAD L40. I researched the L40 extensively before buying and given the many excellent reviews, I expected much more. I'm new to hi-fi and was looking for a simple system for my home office. I tried the Bose Wave Radio CD--a product which is probably blaspheme to those who frequent this site. Needless to say the L40 is much better than the Bose. Similar Products Used: Bose Wave Radio CD |
[Dec 02, 2001]
Ralph
Casual Listener
Strength:
Not aware of any yet...
Weakness:
My L40 doesn't work Although I haven't had the pleasure of actually listening to this NAD L40 CD/Rec. at home yet, I'm adding this reveiw in case there is anyone else who has bought a NAD product, unpacked it (like a kid at christmas time), only to find a dud. I took the new L40 out of the factory-sealed box, plugged it in and only got a light above the power switch. Similar Products Used: Older NAD, Rotel |
[May 06, 1999]
Shaun
an Audio Enthusiast
NAD L40 CD ReceiverD. H. Labs Silver Sonic T-14's |
[May 20, 2001]
George Hoering
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
compactness, sound quality, tuner performance
Weakness:
few, minor, personal issues I bought the L-40 as a second system and I have to say how pleased I am with it. I'm not a golden eared audiophile so whatever "flaws" there are to the sound I couldn't say. I just like to listen to the music. The only "gripe" I have with it is that it "thumps" a little at power-up. NAD tells me that this is SOP and it won't hurt the speakers. C'mon! Similar Products Used: none like this |
[Jan 07, 2001]
Mike
Audiophile
Strength:
One-stop shopping for a reasonable quality receiver and CD player.
Weakness:
During startup, doesn't use the last selected mode (e.g. tuner). Always defaults to CD. The product was purchased specifically to provide CD & FM in a 50' x 30' indoor pool room. It provides power to 4 Polk AB855 in-wall speakers which are connected as two stereo pairs in series on opposite sides of the room (50' apart). The objective was to achieve good sound in a less-than-stellar environment. Similar Products Used: Large range of separates & receivers over the past 25 years. |
[Mar 10, 2001]
Juan Sebastian
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
great value and quality!
Weakness:
Programming CD tracks is counter intuitive Great value from the NAD Music System matched w/ PSB Alpha Minis. These bookshelf speakers deliver much bigger sound, a deep bass, nice seperation and exquisite highs! A steal for the money ($149) if bought seperately! The NAD CD/Receiver is also solidly built and will last a long time! Receiver is powerful, CD programming however is counter intuitive as you have to choose those track that you do NOT want to play.. otherwise, it's a great compact system! great value and quality for the money! highly recommended! Similar Products Used: Marantz |
[Oct 23, 1999]
Doug
Audio Enthusiast
I picked up a NAD L40 to replace my aging bedroon system. Overall, I am very happy with the unit. |