Benz Micro Glider Cartridges
Benz Micro Glider Cartridges
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 20, 1999]
Paul Guy
an Audiophile
For me this was a VERY expensive cartridge. Happily they were(and maybe still are) accepting your old cartridge as a credit for |
[Sep 17, 2001]
Ronald Wan
Audiophile
Strength:
Neutral with the Benz Micro Switzerland signature
Weakness:
Lack the base and is not as fine as the Ortofons This cartridge is good, although I did not realise I bought a retipped one after I got the chance to talk to the real dealer. Similar Products Used: Denon 103 Pro, Dynavector XX-1L |
[Sep 15, 1999]
Jim Brandt
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased the Glider to replace my Sumiko Blue Point Special, which was coming up for replacement. The Glider is a superb cartridge. It is an excellent tracker, with outstanding resolution and detail. I cannot imagine how the performance the Glider delivers could be significantly improved upon, without spending real megabucks. |
[Nov 26, 1999]
TBONE
Audiophile
Strength:
Very Musical and low groove noise.
Weakness:
Extensive Breakin period Phono cartridges may in fact be the biggest purchasing gamble in the audio world. First the performance of your turntable and then your tonearm are more important to overall quality sound then the cartride itself. If the tt / tonearm are top quality, then also the interface between the cartridge and pre-amp will effect sound quality. Add additional variables such as VTA (very important) and record alignment, turntable setup and you have a considerable number of factors that will effect the sound quality that the cartridge will then produce and pass on to your speakers. In other words, the cartridge will pick up distortions from many different components, and will pass them on as characteristics of it's own. |
[Jan 02, 2000]
DMK
Audio Enthusiast
I've used this product for a couple of years now and never knew how much I liked it until recently. Certainly, it was a step up from the Goldring G1022 it replaced in my Rega Planar 3/RB300 setup. It was much more neutral and brought out more of the music. |
[Oct 09, 1999]
1derful
Audiophile
I'm the owner of the Benz Glider and the new RubyH. For its price the Glider is a real bargain. The mid and high sound silky smooth kinda like an ESL speaker. The major difference between the Glider and the RubyH would be in the bass area. The RubyH has more texture and body throughout the spectrum and the bass is more solid, more defined and with more slam. The midrange of the RubyH is also more musical than the Glider. I'm using both cartridges with the SME V + SOTA Star. |
[Nov 05, 2000]
A. Silva
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparency, low price for a MC
Weakness:
little brigth sound (a little) I'm very happy with this MC. I can't understand why Stereophile recommended this as a "C" component when the Arum Beta is a "B". In my ears with the same system and turntables (Regas 3 and 25) the Glider much times better sounding than the Arum Beta. The air and transparency between instruments and voices is something than the Clearaudio match in any way. Similar Products Used: Cearaudio Arum Beta |